Benign Neglect or Malign Select?: Entry Cost to GATS/WTO

IF 1 Q3 ECONOMICS East Asian Economic Review Pub Date : 2018-06-30 DOI:10.11644/kiep.eaer.2018.22.2.340
KeukJe Sung
{"title":"Benign Neglect or Malign Select?: Entry Cost to GATS/WTO","authors":"KeukJe Sung","doi":"10.11644/kiep.eaer.2018.22.2.340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"WTO was established in 1995 and as many as 36 new members joined WTO until December 2017. Thus it would be interesting to see if new members have committed higher or lower levels of market opening compared to the original members. In this regard, a sophisticated scoring scheme is needed to quantify market opening commitments. After proper econometric model is established for the original members, same model can be applied to the new members for comparison. It was found that new members committed a much higher level of commitment than the original members. In addition, it was also found that transition economies committed higher levels than the non-transition economies. More interesting finding is that among the new members, the larger the economies or the larger the trading volume are, the closer was the level of commitment to the predicted level. Then the question is whether this difference was due to benign neglect by the new members or due to malign select by the original members.","PeriodicalId":41122,"journal":{"name":"East Asian Economic Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East Asian Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11644/kiep.eaer.2018.22.2.340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

WTO was established in 1995 and as many as 36 new members joined WTO until December 2017. Thus it would be interesting to see if new members have committed higher or lower levels of market opening compared to the original members. In this regard, a sophisticated scoring scheme is needed to quantify market opening commitments. After proper econometric model is established for the original members, same model can be applied to the new members for comparison. It was found that new members committed a much higher level of commitment than the original members. In addition, it was also found that transition economies committed higher levels than the non-transition economies. More interesting finding is that among the new members, the larger the economies or the larger the trading volume are, the closer was the level of commitment to the predicted level. Then the question is whether this difference was due to benign neglect by the new members or due to malign select by the original members.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
良性忽视还是恶性选择?:关贸总协定/世贸组织的进入成本
世界贸易组织成立于1995年,截至2017年12月,已有36个新成员加入。因此,与原有成员国相比,新成员国的市场开放水平是更高还是更低,这将是一件有趣的事情。在这方面,需要一个复杂的评分方案来量化市场开放承诺。在对原有构件建立适当的计量模型后,可以将相同的模型应用于新构件进行比较。研究发现,新成员的承诺水平比原成员高得多。此外,还发现转型期经济体比非转型期经济体承诺的数额更高。更有趣的发现是,在新成员中,经济规模越大或交易量越大,承诺水平越接近预测水平。那么问题是,这种差异是由于新成员的良性忽视,还是由于原成员的恶性选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
12.50%
发文量
10
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Environmental and Economic Impact of Trade between South Korea and the United State The Structure and Evolution of Renewable Energy Trade Networks in the RCEP Region: Application of SNA Method Assessing the Economic Impact of Covid-19 through a Counterfactual Analysis International Transmission of Macroeconomic Uncertainty in China: A Time-varying Bayesian Global SVAR Approach The Ebb and Flow of Regional Integration Vision in Asia-Pacific: From A Lens of Leaders’ Declarations over 30 Years
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1