{"title":"Research Productivity in Business and Economics: South Korea, 1990-2016","authors":"Jang C. Jin","doi":"10.11644/kiep.eaer.2019.23.1.357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper ranks higher education in Korea based upon research productivity in business and economics disciplines. The number of SCI-level journal articles are tabulated using the Web of Science search engine, over the sample period from 1990 to 2016. The league table shows that many private universities dominate top-tier ranks, which is consistent with the school reputations most commonly cited by the general public in Korea. In contrast, many national universities appear in the second-tier, and their scanty performance in business and economics is in sharp contrast with our earlier findings in which national universities performed well in science and engineering fields (Jin and Kim, 2018). In addition, the ranking order in lower-ranked schools is found to be sensitive to a small change in publications, whereas the publication gap among top-tier schools is relatively large. Finally, unlike our general perception, the size of school does not matter for collaborative research. Some policy implications are discussed as a conclusion.","PeriodicalId":41122,"journal":{"name":"East Asian Economic Review","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East Asian Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11644/kiep.eaer.2019.23.1.357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper ranks higher education in Korea based upon research productivity in business and economics disciplines. The number of SCI-level journal articles are tabulated using the Web of Science search engine, over the sample period from 1990 to 2016. The league table shows that many private universities dominate top-tier ranks, which is consistent with the school reputations most commonly cited by the general public in Korea. In contrast, many national universities appear in the second-tier, and their scanty performance in business and economics is in sharp contrast with our earlier findings in which national universities performed well in science and engineering fields (Jin and Kim, 2018). In addition, the ranking order in lower-ranked schools is found to be sensitive to a small change in publications, whereas the publication gap among top-tier schools is relatively large. Finally, unlike our general perception, the size of school does not matter for collaborative research. Some policy implications are discussed as a conclusion.
本文根据商业和经济学科的研究生产力对韩国高等教育进行了排名。使用Web of Science搜索引擎将1990年至2016年样本期间的sci级别期刊文章数量制成表格。排名显示,很多私立大学占据了前几名,这与韩国国民最常提到的学校声誉一致。相比之下,许多国立大学出现在二线,它们在商业和经济方面的薄弱表现与我们早期的发现形成鲜明对比,其中国立大学在科学和工程领域表现良好(Jin和Kim, 2018)。此外,排名较低的学校的排名顺序对出版物的微小变化很敏感,而排名靠前的学校之间的出版物差距相对较大。最后,与我们的普遍看法不同,学校的规模对合作研究并不重要。作为结论,讨论了一些政策影响。