{"title":"Ahead by a Century","authors":"John Perry, D.T. Everhart","doi":"10.1111/moth.12908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Paul Tyson's <i>A Christian Theology of Science</i> has convinced me that David Hume would not be able to affirm the Nicene Creed, though admittedly I didn't need much convincing. In fact, Tyson persuaded me of nearly all his claims about matters before, say, 1922. It is not as though I disagree with the rest, but that in telling the sweeping story of theology's fate in modernity—on which I agree with Tyson—he cuts off his story too soon: a hundred years ago, just when things were about to get exciting in theology again. If he had continued telling the story until today, his book would likely come to very different conclusions; my own conclusions, not coincidentally.1 My plan here is first, to summarize the book, second, to continue Tyson's own story but filling in the missing last century, and finally, to consider a few examples to show how Tyson's Christian theology of science could cash out in scientific practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":18945,"journal":{"name":"Modern Theology","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12908","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Paul Tyson's A Christian Theology of Science has convinced me that David Hume would not be able to affirm the Nicene Creed, though admittedly I didn't need much convincing. In fact, Tyson persuaded me of nearly all his claims about matters before, say, 1922. It is not as though I disagree with the rest, but that in telling the sweeping story of theology's fate in modernity—on which I agree with Tyson—he cuts off his story too soon: a hundred years ago, just when things were about to get exciting in theology again. If he had continued telling the story until today, his book would likely come to very different conclusions; my own conclusions, not coincidentally.1 My plan here is first, to summarize the book, second, to continue Tyson's own story but filling in the missing last century, and finally, to consider a few examples to show how Tyson's Christian theology of science could cash out in scientific practice.
保罗·泰森(Paul Tyson)的《基督教科学神学》(A Christian Theology of Science)让我相信,大卫·休谟(David Hume)无法肯定尼西亚信经,尽管我承认我不需要太多说服力。事实上,在1922年之前,泰森几乎说服了我他所有关于事物的主张。并不是说我不同意其他人的观点,而是说在讲述神学在现代命运的宏大故事时——我同意泰森的观点——他过早地切断了他的故事:一百年前,就在神学即将再次变得激动人心的时候。如果他把这个故事一直讲到今天,他的书可能会得出非常不同的结论;这是我自己的结论,并非巧合我在这里的计划是,首先,总结这本书,其次,继续泰森自己的故事,但填补上个世纪缺失的部分,最后,考虑几个例子,以表明泰森的基督教科学神学如何在科学实践中兑现。