Evaluation of a School-Based Attention Training Program for Improving Sustained Attention

IF 1.9 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Mind Brain and Education Pub Date : 2023-11-20 DOI:10.1111/mbe.12396
Eadaoin J. Slattery, Patrick Ryan, Donal G. Fortune, Laura P. McAvinue
{"title":"Evaluation of a School-Based Attention Training Program for Improving Sustained Attention","authors":"Eadaoin J. Slattery, Patrick Ryan, Donal G. Fortune, Laura P. McAvinue","doi":"10.1111/mbe.12396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluated the impact of a theory-driven cognitive attention training program, <i>Keeping Score!</i>, in improving students' sustained attention capacity. Training was based on sustained updating. Students engaged this process by mentally keeping score during an interactive game of table tennis without external aids. Students (9–11 years) were assigned to a 6-week training program (<i>n</i> = 18) or an active control (<i>n</i> = 18). Assessments of sustained attention/working memory and parent ratings of executive function were completed at pretraining, post-training, and 6-week follow-up. We found no evidence to support the efficacy of training (i.e., there was no statistically significant time × group interaction effects for any outcome). Overall, these findings add to the mixed body of literature supporting the efficacy of cognitive attention training for improving children's attentional capacity. One possibility for why the training program was unsuccessful is perhaps that cognitive attention training may not be sufficient for enhancing sustained attention.","PeriodicalId":51595,"journal":{"name":"Mind Brain and Education","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mind Brain and Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12396","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the impact of a theory-driven cognitive attention training program, Keeping Score!, in improving students' sustained attention capacity. Training was based on sustained updating. Students engaged this process by mentally keeping score during an interactive game of table tennis without external aids. Students (9–11 years) were assigned to a 6-week training program (n = 18) or an active control (n = 18). Assessments of sustained attention/working memory and parent ratings of executive function were completed at pretraining, post-training, and 6-week follow-up. We found no evidence to support the efficacy of training (i.e., there was no statistically significant time × group interaction effects for any outcome). Overall, these findings add to the mixed body of literature supporting the efficacy of cognitive attention training for improving children's attentional capacity. One possibility for why the training program was unsuccessful is perhaps that cognitive attention training may not be sufficient for enhancing sustained attention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以学校为本的注意力训练计划对改善持续注意力的评估
这项研究评估了一个理论驱动的认知注意力训练项目的影响,保持得分!,以提高学生的持续注意能力。培训以持续更新为基础。学生们在没有外界帮助的情况下,通过在乒乓球互动游戏中记分来参与这个过程。学生(9-11岁)被分配到一个为期6周的训练计划(n = 18)或一个主动对照(n = 18)。在训练前、训练后和6周随访时完成持续注意/工作记忆和父母执行功能评分的评估。我们没有发现任何证据支持训练的有效性(即,对任何结果都没有统计学上显著的时间×组相互作用效应)。总的来说,这些发现增加了支持认知注意力训练对提高儿童注意力能力的有效性的文献。训练计划失败的一个可能原因是,认知注意力训练可能不足以增强持续的注意力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Mind, Brain, and Education (MBE), recognized as the 2007 Best New Journal in the Social Sciences & Humanities by the Association of American Publishers" Professional & Scholarly Publishing Division, provides a forum for the accessible presentation of basic and applied research on learning and development, including analyses from biology, cognitive science, and education. The journal grew out of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society"s mission to create a new field of mind, brain and education, with educators and researchers expertly collaborating in integrating the variety of fields connecting mind, brain, and education in research, theory, and/or practice.
期刊最新文献
Need for Cognition, Neuromyths, and Knowledge about the Brain in Aspiring Teachers Sibling Effects on School Achievement: Evidence From Two Large French Cohorts Evidence, Policy, Education, and Neuroscience—The State of Play in the UK Underutilized Techniques and Underrepresented Samples in Educational Neuroscience Research: An Introduction to the Special Issue Fixation Disparity: A Possible Index of Visuospatial Cognition during Authentic Learning Tasks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1