Assessing the evidence for the comparability of socioeconomic status between students with and without immigrant background in Norway and Sweden

IF 2.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Large-Scale Assessments in Education Pub Date : 2022-09-13 DOI:10.1186/s40536-022-00132-w
Oleksandra Mittal, Ronny Scherer, Trude Nilsen
{"title":"Assessing the evidence for the comparability of socioeconomic status between students with and without immigrant background in Norway and Sweden","authors":"Oleksandra Mittal, Ronny Scherer, Trude Nilsen","doi":"10.1186/s40536-022-00132-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The prerequisite for meaningful comparisons of educational inequality indicators across immigration status is the comparability of socioeconomic status (SES) measures. The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) uses its index of economic, social, and cultural status (ESCS) to provide insights into the problems of inequality across students’ socioeconomic and immigration statuses. However, missing evidence regarding the comparability of the ESCS index or its components across students with and without immigrant background challenges the accuracy of empirical inferences. Our study sheds light on the comparability of the index of household possessions (HOMEPOS) across immigration status in Norway and Sweden—two countries that continue to be two largest recipients of immigration flows among their Nordic neighbours. We tested the PISA 2018 HOMEPOS scale for the overall measurement invariance and possible differential item functioning (DIF) across three student groups with first-generation, second-generation, or no immigrant background. Several HOMEPOS items exhibited DIF within these countries. Moreover, we examined how four strategies to deal with DIF items may affect the inferences regarding educational inequalities across immigration status. The strength of the HOMEPOS–achievement association was sensitive to the choice of approach for 15-year-old immigrant students, while it remained stable and moderate for native students. Our findings encourage researchers using the HOMEPOS scale to consider the invariance testing to avoid measurement bias and provide robust evidence characterizing immigrant achievement gaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":37009,"journal":{"name":"Large-Scale Assessments in Education","volume":"20 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Large-Scale Assessments in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-022-00132-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prerequisite for meaningful comparisons of educational inequality indicators across immigration status is the comparability of socioeconomic status (SES) measures. The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) uses its index of economic, social, and cultural status (ESCS) to provide insights into the problems of inequality across students’ socioeconomic and immigration statuses. However, missing evidence regarding the comparability of the ESCS index or its components across students with and without immigrant background challenges the accuracy of empirical inferences. Our study sheds light on the comparability of the index of household possessions (HOMEPOS) across immigration status in Norway and Sweden—two countries that continue to be two largest recipients of immigration flows among their Nordic neighbours. We tested the PISA 2018 HOMEPOS scale for the overall measurement invariance and possible differential item functioning (DIF) across three student groups with first-generation, second-generation, or no immigrant background. Several HOMEPOS items exhibited DIF within these countries. Moreover, we examined how four strategies to deal with DIF items may affect the inferences regarding educational inequalities across immigration status. The strength of the HOMEPOS–achievement association was sensitive to the choice of approach for 15-year-old immigrant students, while it remained stable and moderate for native students. Our findings encourage researchers using the HOMEPOS scale to consider the invariance testing to avoid measurement bias and provide robust evidence characterizing immigrant achievement gaps.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估挪威和瑞典有和没有移民背景的学生社会经济地位可比性的证据
对不同移民身份的教育不平等指标进行有意义比较的先决条件是社会经济地位(SES)指标的可比性。国际学生评估项目(PISA)使用其经济、社会和文化地位指数(ESCS)来深入了解学生的社会经济和移民地位不平等问题。然而,缺乏关于ESCS指数或其组成部分在有和没有移民背景的学生之间的可比性的证据,挑战了经验推断的准确性。我们的研究揭示了挪威和瑞典移民身份的家庭财产指数(HOMEPOS)的可比性,这两个国家仍然是北欧邻国中最大的两个移民接受国。我们测试了PISA 2018 HOMEPOS量表在第一代、第二代或无移民背景的三个学生群体中的总体测量不变性和可能的差异项目功能(DIF)。几个HOMEPOS项目在这些国家表现出DIF。此外,我们研究了处理DIF项目的四种策略如何影响有关移民身份的教育不平等的推论。15岁移民学生的homeposs -成就关联强度对学习方法的选择敏感,而本地学生的homeposs -成就关联强度保持稳定和中等。我们的研究结果鼓励使用HOMEPOS量表的研究人员考虑不变性检验,以避免测量偏差,并提供表征移民成就差距的有力证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Large-Scale Assessments in Education
Large-Scale Assessments in Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
16
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of student ICT competence according to mathematics, science, and reading literacy: evidence from PISA 2018 Teacher-centered analysis with TIMSS and PIRLS data: weighting approaches, accuracy, and precision Secondary school students’ attitudes of tolerance towards minorities Participation rates, characteristics, and differential effects on reading literacy of extracurricular tutoring in a German large-scale assessment Teaching practices and organisational aspects associated with the use of ICT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1