Behavioural digital biomarkers enable real-time monitoring of patient-reported outcomes: a substudy of the multicentre, prospective observational SafeHeart study.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad069
Maarten Z H Kolk, Diana M Frodi, Joss Langford, Caroline J Meskers, Tariq O Andersen, Peter Karl Jacobsen, Niels Risum, Hanno L Tan, Jesper H Svendsen, Reinoud E Knops, Søren Z Diederichsen, Fleur V Y Tjong
{"title":"Behavioural digital biomarkers enable real-time monitoring of patient-reported outcomes: a substudy of the multicentre, prospective observational SafeHeart study.","authors":"Maarten Z H Kolk, Diana M Frodi, Joss Langford, Caroline J Meskers, Tariq O Andersen, Peter Karl Jacobsen, Niels Risum, Hanno L Tan, Jesper H Svendsen, Reinoud E Knops, Søren Z Diederichsen, Fleur V Y Tjong","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) serve multiple purposes, including shared decision-making and patient communication, treatment monitoring, and health technology assessment. Patient monitoring using PROMs is constrained by recall and non-response bias, respondent burden, and missing data. We evaluated the potential of behavioural digital biomarkers obtained from a wearable accelerometer to achieve personalized predictions of PROMs.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Data from the multicentre, prospective SafeHeart study conducted at Amsterdam University Medical Center in the Netherlands and Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet in Copenhagen, Denmark, were used. The study enrolled patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator between May 2021 and September 2022 who then wore wearable devices with raw acceleration output to capture digital biomarkers reflecting physical behaviour. To collect PROMs, patients received the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and EuroQoL 5-Dimensions 5-Level (EQ5D-5L) questionnaire at two instances: baseline and after six months. Multivariable Tobit regression models were used to explore associations between digital biomarkers and PROMs, specifically whether digital biomarkers could enable PROM prediction. The study population consisted of 303 patients (mean age 62.9 ± 10.9 years, 81.2% male). Digital biomarkers showed significant correlations to patient-reported physical and social limitations, severity and frequency of symptoms, and quality of life. Prospective validation of the Tobit models indicated moderate correlations between the observed and predicted scores for KCCQ [concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) = 0.49, mean difference: 1.07 points] and EQ5D-5L (CCC = 0.38, mean difference: 0.02 points).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Wearable digital biomarkers correlate with PROMs, and may be leveraged for real-time prediction. These findings hold promise for monitoring of PROMs through wearable accelerometers.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad069","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) serve multiple purposes, including shared decision-making and patient communication, treatment monitoring, and health technology assessment. Patient monitoring using PROMs is constrained by recall and non-response bias, respondent burden, and missing data. We evaluated the potential of behavioural digital biomarkers obtained from a wearable accelerometer to achieve personalized predictions of PROMs.

Methods and results: Data from the multicentre, prospective SafeHeart study conducted at Amsterdam University Medical Center in the Netherlands and Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet in Copenhagen, Denmark, were used. The study enrolled patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator between May 2021 and September 2022 who then wore wearable devices with raw acceleration output to capture digital biomarkers reflecting physical behaviour. To collect PROMs, patients received the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and EuroQoL 5-Dimensions 5-Level (EQ5D-5L) questionnaire at two instances: baseline and after six months. Multivariable Tobit regression models were used to explore associations between digital biomarkers and PROMs, specifically whether digital biomarkers could enable PROM prediction. The study population consisted of 303 patients (mean age 62.9 ± 10.9 years, 81.2% male). Digital biomarkers showed significant correlations to patient-reported physical and social limitations, severity and frequency of symptoms, and quality of life. Prospective validation of the Tobit models indicated moderate correlations between the observed and predicted scores for KCCQ [concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) = 0.49, mean difference: 1.07 points] and EQ5D-5L (CCC = 0.38, mean difference: 0.02 points).

Conclusion: Wearable digital biomarkers correlate with PROMs, and may be leveraged for real-time prediction. These findings hold promise for monitoring of PROMs through wearable accelerometers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行为数字生物标志物能够实时监测患者报告的结果:多中心前瞻性观察性SafeHeart研究的一个子研究。
患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)具有多种目的,包括共同决策和患者沟通、治疗监测和卫生技术评估。使用prom进行患者监测受到回忆和非反应偏倚、应答者负担和数据缺失的限制。我们评估了从可穿戴加速度计获得的行为数字生物标志物的潜力,以实现对prom的个性化预测。方法:数据来自荷兰阿姆斯特丹大学医学中心和丹麦哥本哈根的Rigshospitalet哥本哈根大学医院进行的多中心前瞻性安全心脏研究。该研究在2021年5月至2022年9月期间招募了带有植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)的患者,然后他们佩戴具有原始加速度输出的可穿戴设备,以捕捉反映身体行为的数字生物标志物。为收集PROMs,患者分别接受KCCQ和eq5d - 5l问卷;基线和6个月后。多变量Tobit回归模型用于探索数字生物标志物与PROM之间的关系,特别是数字生物标志物是否能够预测PROM。结果:研究人群包括303例患者(平均年龄62.9±10.9岁,男性81.2%)。数字生物标志物显示与患者报告的身体和社会限制、症状的严重程度和频率以及生活质量显著相关。Tobit模型的前瞻性验证表明,KCCQ(一致性相关系数(CCC) = 0.49,平均差值为1.07分)和eq5d - 5l (CCC = 0.38,平均差值为0.02分)的观察值与预测值之间存在中度相关性。结论:可穿戴数字生物标志物与prom相关,可用于实时预测。这些发现为通过可穿戴加速计监测prom带来了希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: European Heart Journal - Quality of Care & Clinical Outcomes is an English language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing cardiovascular outcomes research. It serves as an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology and maintains a close alliance with the European Heart Health Institute. The journal disseminates original research and topical reviews contributed by health scientists globally, with a focus on the quality of care and its impact on cardiovascular outcomes at the hospital, national, and international levels. It provides a platform for presenting the most outstanding cardiovascular outcomes research to influence cardiovascular public health policy on a global scale. Additionally, the journal aims to motivate young investigators and foster the growth of the outcomes research community.
期刊最新文献
Clinicoeconomic burden among heart failure patients with severely reduced ejection fraction after hospital admission: HF-RESTORE. Trends and risk factors analysis of aortic aneurysm mortality in China over thirty years: based on the global burden of disease 2019 data. Cost-effectiveness of a novel AI technology to quantify coronary inflammation and cardiovascular risk in patients undergoing routine Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography. Regional disparities in heart transplant mortality in the United States. Bacteremia and infective endocarditis following left-sided heart valve surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1