Buoyant ascent rate profiles for the MK10 and MK11 submarine escape and immersion equipment.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine Pub Date : 2023-04-01
David M Fothergill, Christopher S Frederick, Linda M Hughes
{"title":"Buoyant ascent rate profiles for the MK10 and MK11 submarine escape and immersion equipment.","authors":"David M Fothergill, Christopher S Frederick, Linda M Hughes","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Since the U.S. Navy transitioned from the MK10 to the MK11 submarine escape and immersion equipment (SEIE), there has been an increase in the incident rate of pulmonary barotrauma during submarine escape training. This study compares the ascent rate profiles of the MK10 and MK11 SEIE to determine if ascent rate differences between the escape suits are associated with increased pulmonary barotraumas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Buoyant ascent rates of the MK10 and MK11 SEIE were compared using weighted manikins equivalent to the 1st, 50th, and 99th percentile body weight of a submariner. Human ascents using the MK11 (n=126) were compared to human ascents in the same trainer wearing the MK10 (n=124).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Manikin mean ascent times were faster for the MK10 than the MK11 (5.19 seconds vs 5.28 seconds, p ≺ 0.05). Terminal velocity (Vt) was affected by manikin weight (p ≺ 0.001). Human trials confirmed the manikin results. The average mean ascent velocity for the MK10 group was 0.155 meters/ second faster than the MK11 group's mean ascent velocity (p ≺ 0.001). Mean ascent velocity was inversely correlated with all anthropometrics for the MK10 group (p ≺ 0.01). Neither height nor body mass index showed a significant association with mean ascent velocity for the MK11 group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Vt of buoyant ascents is significantly affected by body weight. As the mean ascent rate of the MK11 is slower than that of the MK10, ascent rate profile differences between the suits do not appear to explain the recent increase in pulmonary barotrauma incident rates during escape training.</p>","PeriodicalId":49396,"journal":{"name":"Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine","volume":"50 4","pages":"343-358"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Since the U.S. Navy transitioned from the MK10 to the MK11 submarine escape and immersion equipment (SEIE), there has been an increase in the incident rate of pulmonary barotrauma during submarine escape training. This study compares the ascent rate profiles of the MK10 and MK11 SEIE to determine if ascent rate differences between the escape suits are associated with increased pulmonary barotraumas.

Methods: Buoyant ascent rates of the MK10 and MK11 SEIE were compared using weighted manikins equivalent to the 1st, 50th, and 99th percentile body weight of a submariner. Human ascents using the MK11 (n=126) were compared to human ascents in the same trainer wearing the MK10 (n=124).

Results: Manikin mean ascent times were faster for the MK10 than the MK11 (5.19 seconds vs 5.28 seconds, p ≺ 0.05). Terminal velocity (Vt) was affected by manikin weight (p ≺ 0.001). Human trials confirmed the manikin results. The average mean ascent velocity for the MK10 group was 0.155 meters/ second faster than the MK11 group's mean ascent velocity (p ≺ 0.001). Mean ascent velocity was inversely correlated with all anthropometrics for the MK10 group (p ≺ 0.01). Neither height nor body mass index showed a significant association with mean ascent velocity for the MK11 group.

Conclusions: The Vt of buoyant ascents is significantly affected by body weight. As the mean ascent rate of the MK11 is slower than that of the MK10, ascent rate profile differences between the suits do not appear to explain the recent increase in pulmonary barotrauma incident rates during escape training.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MK10和MK11潜艇逃生和浸入设备的浮力上升率曲线。
导读:自从美国海军从MK10型向MK11型潜艇逃生和浸入设备(SEIE)过渡以来,潜艇逃生训练中肺部气压伤的发生率有所增加。本研究比较了MK10和MK11 SEIE的上升速率曲线,以确定逃生服之间的上升速率差异是否与肺气压损伤的增加有关。方法:MK10和MK11 SEIE的浮力上升率使用相当于潜艇艇员体重的第1、50和99百分位的加权模型进行比较。使用MK11的人类攀爬(n=126)与佩戴MK10的同一训练者的人类攀爬(n=124)进行了比较。结果:MK10的人体平均上升时间比MK11快(5.19秒vs 5.28秒,p{0.05})。终端速度(Vt)受人体重量的影响(p < 0.001)。人体试验证实了人体模型的结果。MK10组的平均上升速度比MK11组的平均上升速度快0.155 m / s (p < 0.001)。MK10组的平均上升速度与所有人体测量值呈负相关(p{0.01})。MK11组的身高和体重指数与平均上升速度均无显著相关性。结论:浮力上升的Vt受体重的显著影响。由于MK11的平均上升速率比MK10慢,不同宇航服之间的上升速率曲线差异似乎不能解释最近逃生训练期间肺气压伤发生率的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine
Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine 医学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine Journal accepts manuscripts for publication that are related to the areas of diving research and physiology, hyperbaric medicine and oxygen therapy, submarine medicine, naval medicine and clinical research related to the above topics. To be considered for UHM scientific papers must deal with significant and new research in an area related to biological, physical and clinical phenomena related to the above environments.
期刊最新文献
A comparison of the treatment outcomes of cerebral gas embolism at 2.8 ATA in comparison with 6 ATA. Behavior and changes in rectal temperature in dogs and cats undergoing hyperbaric oxygen therapy: clinical data review. Does hyperbaric chamber attendance pose an asthma risk? Case report. Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss - A Comorbidity Lens. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for treatment of vascular occlusion after permanent dermal filler injection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1