{"title":"Producing and managing continuous change in an educational context: liminal affective technologies and leadership","authors":"Dorethe Bjergkilde, Paul Stenner","doi":"10.1057/s41286-021-00115-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Currently, municipal schools in Denmark face reforms and political demands for organizational change (EVA in Ledelse tæt på undervisning og læring : erfaringer fra fire skoler med gode ledelsespraksisser, 2015). The perception is now commonly held that it is necessary to radically rethink the entire set up of the institutional school towards a more flexible, adaptable and co-operative organization (Irgens and Jensen in Skolen som kunnskapsorganisasjon. Utdanning, nr.3,1. februar, 2008). This paper explores an empirical case, where a school is implementing a device called ‘flexible timetables’ in an attempt to depart from former fixed structures and private teaching practices. By combining process thought and liminality theory, the paper offers a theoretical framework for understanding some of the dynamics and unintended consequences of this transformation process. In so doing the paper calls attention to some important limits to the vision of flexibility and openness that informs this program of organisational change and subjectivity. Flexible timetables are conceptualized as a liminal affective technology (Stenner and Moreno-Gabriel in Subjectivity 6(3):229–253, https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2013.9, 2013), designed to disrupt structures supporting former institutional practices, and to engender circumstances that are describable in terms of liminal experience. We use the concept of liminal affectivity to describe the collective atmosphere of ambivalence and volatility that is summoned through the intervention. We also draw attention to certain unexpected side effects, as when the participants experience themselves both paralysed by the ensuing paradoxes, and captured in dynamics of polarisation (Greco and Stenner in Theory Psychol 27(2):147–166, https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354317693120, 2017). The paper proposes the concept liminal affective leadership wherein the use of the technology is framed as a continuously sensitive balancing of the volatile liminal affectivity that it induces.</p>","PeriodicalId":46273,"journal":{"name":"Subjectivity","volume":"33 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Subjectivity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-021-00115-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Currently, municipal schools in Denmark face reforms and political demands for organizational change (EVA in Ledelse tæt på undervisning og læring : erfaringer fra fire skoler med gode ledelsespraksisser, 2015). The perception is now commonly held that it is necessary to radically rethink the entire set up of the institutional school towards a more flexible, adaptable and co-operative organization (Irgens and Jensen in Skolen som kunnskapsorganisasjon. Utdanning, nr.3,1. februar, 2008). This paper explores an empirical case, where a school is implementing a device called ‘flexible timetables’ in an attempt to depart from former fixed structures and private teaching practices. By combining process thought and liminality theory, the paper offers a theoretical framework for understanding some of the dynamics and unintended consequences of this transformation process. In so doing the paper calls attention to some important limits to the vision of flexibility and openness that informs this program of organisational change and subjectivity. Flexible timetables are conceptualized as a liminal affective technology (Stenner and Moreno-Gabriel in Subjectivity 6(3):229–253, https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2013.9, 2013), designed to disrupt structures supporting former institutional practices, and to engender circumstances that are describable in terms of liminal experience. We use the concept of liminal affectivity to describe the collective atmosphere of ambivalence and volatility that is summoned through the intervention. We also draw attention to certain unexpected side effects, as when the participants experience themselves both paralysed by the ensuing paradoxes, and captured in dynamics of polarisation (Greco and Stenner in Theory Psychol 27(2):147–166, https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354317693120, 2017). The paper proposes the concept liminal affective leadership wherein the use of the technology is framed as a continuously sensitive balancing of the volatile liminal affectivity that it induces.
目前,丹麦的市政学校面临着组织变革的改革和政治诉求(EVA in Ledelse tæt pendorundervisning og . æring: erfaringer fra fire skoler med gode ledelsespraksiser, 2015)。现在人们普遍认为,有必要从根本上重新思考学院的整个设置,使其成为一个更灵活、适应性更强、更合作的组织(Irgens和Jensen in Skolen som kunnskapsorganisasjon)。Utdanning nr.3 1。februar, 2008)。本文探讨了一个实证案例,其中一所学校正在实施一种名为“灵活时间表”的设备,试图摆脱以前的固定结构和私人教学实践。通过结合过程思想和阈限理论,本文为理解这一转变过程的一些动态和意想不到的后果提供了一个理论框架。在这样做的过程中,论文提请注意灵活性和开放性的一些重要限制,这些限制通知了组织变革和主观性的计划。灵活的时间表被概念化为一种阈限情感技术(Stenner和Moreno-Gabriel在《主体性》6(3):229-253,https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2013.9, 2013),旨在破坏支持以前制度实践的结构,并产生可以用阈限经验来描述的环境。我们使用阈限情感的概念来描述通过干预所召唤的矛盾和波动的集体氛围。我们还注意到某些意想不到的副作用,比如当参与者经历自己被随之而来的悖论所麻痹,并被两极分化的动态所捕获时(Greco和Stenner in Theory Psychol 27(2): 147-166, https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354317693120, 2017)。本文提出了阈限情感领导的概念,其中该技术的使用被框架为其诱导的挥发性阈限情感的持续敏感平衡。
期刊介绍:
Subjectivity is an international, transdisciplinary journal examining the social, cultural, historical and material processes, dynamics and structures of human experience. As topic, problem and resource, notions of subjectivity are relevant to many disciplines, including cultural studies, sociology, social theory, geography, anthropology and psychology. The journal brings together scholars from across the social sciences and the humanities, publishing high-quality theoretical and empirical papers that address the processes by which subjectivities are produced, explore subjectivity as a locus of social change, and examine how emerging subjectivities remake our social worlds.