Megafauna restoration as a legal obligation: International biodiversity law and the rehabilitation of large mammals in Europe

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law Pub Date : 2022-04-25 DOI:10.1111/reel.12443
Arie Trouwborst, Jens-Christian Svenning
{"title":"Megafauna restoration as a legal obligation: International biodiversity law and the rehabilitation of large mammals in Europe","authors":"Arie Trouwborst, Jens-Christian Svenning","doi":"10.1111/reel.12443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Restoring functional ecosystems in Europe inter alia requires restoring large mammal (megafauna) diversity and densities to levels well above the current downgraded state, which results from a human-driven wave of megafauna extinctions and extirpations in the Late Pleistocene and Holocene. Combining law and natural science, we address the question to what degrees international legal instruments support or require such megafauna rewilding efforts. We provide an overview of Europe's current megafauna plus those species that would likely have been present without human interference. We categorize these species and restoration scenarios in ways that make sense from a legal perspective and identify and interpret relevant legal instruments. Our analysis indicates that Article 8(f) of the Convention on Biological Diversity requires restoring the diversity and densities of Europe's megafauna as far as possible—which is indeed quite far. Depending on the circumstances, megafauna rewilding measures can also be required or supported by various other legal instruments at global, pan-European, European Union and other levels.","PeriodicalId":51681,"journal":{"name":"Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12443","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Restoring functional ecosystems in Europe inter alia requires restoring large mammal (megafauna) diversity and densities to levels well above the current downgraded state, which results from a human-driven wave of megafauna extinctions and extirpations in the Late Pleistocene and Holocene. Combining law and natural science, we address the question to what degrees international legal instruments support or require such megafauna rewilding efforts. We provide an overview of Europe's current megafauna plus those species that would likely have been present without human interference. We categorize these species and restoration scenarios in ways that make sense from a legal perspective and identify and interpret relevant legal instruments. Our analysis indicates that Article 8(f) of the Convention on Biological Diversity requires restoring the diversity and densities of Europe's megafauna as far as possible—which is indeed quite far. Depending on the circumstances, megafauna rewilding measures can also be required or supported by various other legal instruments at global, pan-European, European Union and other levels.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巨型动物恢复作为一项法律义务:国际生物多样性法和欧洲大型哺乳动物的恢复
要恢复欧洲的功能生态系统,除其他外,还需要将大型哺乳动物(巨型动物)的多样性和密度恢复到远高于当前降级状态的水平,这是由晚更新世和全新世人类驱动的巨型动物灭绝浪潮造成的。结合法律和自然科学,我们解决了国际法律文书在多大程度上支持或要求这种大型动物的野生化努力的问题。我们提供了欧洲目前的巨型动物以及那些没有人类干预可能已经存在的物种的概述。我们从法律角度对这些物种和恢复方案进行分类,并确定和解释相关的法律文书。我们的分析表明,《生物多样性公约》第8(f)条要求尽可能地恢复欧洲巨型动物的多样性和密度——这确实是相当远的。根据具体情况,还可以要求或得到全球、泛欧、欧盟和其他各级各种其他法律文书的支持,采取大型野生动物恢复措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
National discretion or broadening acceptable interpretation? A comparative overview of the transposition and implementation of the Water Framework Directive The Czech Republic v Poland (Mine de Turów): Politics and implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive The awkward relations between EU innovation policies and environmental law Towards the adoption of climate change acts in the Visegrad Group countries A quasi‐normative conflict: Resolving the tension between investment treaties and climate action
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1