A simple method to genetically differentiate invasive F1 Typha hybrids (T. × glauca) and advanced-generation/backcrossed hybrids from parent species (T. Latifolia and T. angustifolia) in eastern Canada and northeastern USA
{"title":"A simple method to genetically differentiate invasive F1 Typha hybrids (T. × glauca) and advanced-generation/backcrossed hybrids from parent species (T. Latifolia and T. angustifolia) in eastern Canada and northeastern USA","authors":"Avery Chambers , Braidy Chambers , Deven Bhargava , Alberto Aleman , Marcel Dorken , Joanna Freeland","doi":"10.1016/j.jglr.2023.102257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A widespread <em>Typha</em> (cattail) hybrid zone in southeastern Canada and northeastern USA comprises <em>T. latifolia, T. angustifolia,</em> and their hybrid <em>T.</em> × <em>glauca.</em> In this region the hybrid is considered invasive because of its detrimental impacts on wetlands and biodiversity. Researchers and managers are increasingly interested in tracking and controlling the spread of the invasive hybrid, but this can be hampered by challenges in differentiating taxa: while the parent species and F1 hybrids can often be identified from morphological characteristics, advanced-generation and backcrossed hybrids can be common, and these have obscured morphological distinctions among taxa. Here we present five species-specific genetic markers that differentiate <em>T. latifolia, T. angustifolia,</em> F<sub>1</sub> hybrids, and advanced-generation/backcrossed hybrids. Unlike the pre-existing species-specific microsatellite markers, these markers require only PCR or PCR followed by a restriction enzyme digest, and can be visualized on an agarose gel. As a result, they require less specialized equipment than existing species-specific markers, and should therefore be useful for a larger group of practitioners. Future use of these markers could include monitoring range expansions, assessing the outcomes of restoration programs, and avoiding the unnecessary elimination of native <em>Typha.</em></p></div>","PeriodicalId":54818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Great Lakes Research","volume":"50 1","pages":"Article 102257"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0380133023002502/pdfft?md5=c519957aff18440c2bbe7537f8d7baa0&pid=1-s2.0-S0380133023002502-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Great Lakes Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0380133023002502","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A widespread Typha (cattail) hybrid zone in southeastern Canada and northeastern USA comprises T. latifolia, T. angustifolia, and their hybrid T. × glauca. In this region the hybrid is considered invasive because of its detrimental impacts on wetlands and biodiversity. Researchers and managers are increasingly interested in tracking and controlling the spread of the invasive hybrid, but this can be hampered by challenges in differentiating taxa: while the parent species and F1 hybrids can often be identified from morphological characteristics, advanced-generation and backcrossed hybrids can be common, and these have obscured morphological distinctions among taxa. Here we present five species-specific genetic markers that differentiate T. latifolia, T. angustifolia, F1 hybrids, and advanced-generation/backcrossed hybrids. Unlike the pre-existing species-specific microsatellite markers, these markers require only PCR or PCR followed by a restriction enzyme digest, and can be visualized on an agarose gel. As a result, they require less specialized equipment than existing species-specific markers, and should therefore be useful for a larger group of practitioners. Future use of these markers could include monitoring range expansions, assessing the outcomes of restoration programs, and avoiding the unnecessary elimination of native Typha.
从加拿大东部和美国东北部亲本种(T. Latifolia和T. angustifolia)中分离出侵染性F1型Typha杂交种(T. x glauca)和进代/回交杂交种的简单遗传分化方法
在加拿大东南部和美国东北部广泛分布的香蒲(香蒲)杂交带包括T. latifolia、T. angustifolia和它们的杂交T. x glauca。在该地区,由于其对湿地和生物多样性的有害影响,杂交物种被认为是入侵物种。研究人员和管理人员对追踪和控制入侵杂交种的传播越来越感兴趣,但这可能受到分类群区分方面的挑战的阻碍:虽然亲本种和F1杂交种通常可以从形态学特征来识别,但高级代和回交杂交种可能很常见,这些模糊了分类群之间的形态学差异。在此,我们提出了5个物种特异性的遗传标记,用于区分荷叶T. latifolia, T. angustifolia, F1杂交种和高级/回交杂交种。与现有的物种特异性微卫星标记不同,这些标记只需要PCR或PCR后加限制性内切酶酶切,并且可以在琼脂糖凝胶上可视化。因此,与现有的物种特异性标记相比,它们需要更少的专门设备,因此应该对更大的从业者群体有用。这些标记物的未来应用可能包括监测范围的扩大,评估恢复计划的结果,以及避免不必要地消灭本地的台风。
期刊介绍:
Published six times per year, the Journal of Great Lakes Research is multidisciplinary in its coverage, publishing manuscripts on a wide range of theoretical and applied topics in the natural science fields of biology, chemistry, physics, geology, as well as social sciences of the large lakes of the world and their watersheds. Large lakes generally are considered as those lakes which have a mean surface area of >500 km2 (see Herdendorf, C.E. 1982. Large lakes of the world. J. Great Lakes Res. 8:379-412, for examples), although smaller lakes may be considered, especially if they are very deep. We also welcome contributions on saline lakes and research on estuarine waters where the results have application to large lakes.