A Personalized Interaction Mechanism Framework for Micro-moment Recommender Systems

IF 3.6 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems Pub Date : 2023-03-09 DOI:https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3569586
Yi-Ling Lin, Shao-Wei Lee
{"title":"A Personalized Interaction Mechanism Framework for Micro-moment Recommender Systems","authors":"Yi-Ling Lin, Shao-Wei Lee","doi":"https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3569586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The emergence of the micro-moment concept highlights the influence of context; recommender system design should reflect this trend. In response to different contexts, a micro-moment recommender system (MMRS) requires an effective interaction mechanism that allows users to easily interact with the system in a way that supports autonomy and promotes the creation and expression of self. We study four types of interaction mechanisms to understand which personalization approach is the most suitable design for MMRSs. We assume that designs that support micro-moment needs well are those that give users more control over the system and constitute a lighter user burden. We test our hypothesis via a two-week between-subject field study in which participants used our system and provided feedback. User-initiated and mix-initiated intention mechanisms show higher perceived active control, and the additional controls do not add to user burdens. Therefore, these two designs suit the MMRS interaction mechanism.</p>","PeriodicalId":48574,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems","volume":"53 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3569586","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The emergence of the micro-moment concept highlights the influence of context; recommender system design should reflect this trend. In response to different contexts, a micro-moment recommender system (MMRS) requires an effective interaction mechanism that allows users to easily interact with the system in a way that supports autonomy and promotes the creation and expression of self. We study four types of interaction mechanisms to understand which personalization approach is the most suitable design for MMRSs. We assume that designs that support micro-moment needs well are those that give users more control over the system and constitute a lighter user burden. We test our hypothesis via a two-week between-subject field study in which participants used our system and provided feedback. User-initiated and mix-initiated intention mechanisms show higher perceived active control, and the additional controls do not add to user burdens. Therefore, these two designs suit the MMRS interaction mechanism.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微时刻推荐系统的个性化交互机制框架
微瞬间概念的出现凸显了语境的影响;推荐系统的设计应该反映这一趋势。针对不同的情境,微时刻推荐系统(MMRS)需要一种有效的交互机制,允许用户以支持自主性和促进自我创造和表达的方式轻松地与系统进行交互。我们研究了四种类型的交互机制,以了解哪种个性化方法最适合MMRSs的设计。我们认为,能够很好地支持微瞬间需求的设计是那些能够让用户更好地控制系统并减轻用户负担的设计。我们通过为期两周的主题间实地研究来检验我们的假设,参与者使用我们的系统并提供反馈。用户发起和混合发起的意图机制表现出更高的感知主动控制,并且额外的控制不会增加用户负担。因此,这两种设计都适合MMRS交互机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems
ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems Computer Science-Human-Computer Interaction
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) publishes papers on research concerning the design, realization, or evaluation of interactive systems that incorporate some form of machine intelligence. TIIS articles come from a wide range of research areas and communities. An article can take any of several complementary views of interactive intelligent systems, focusing on: the intelligent technology, the interaction of users with the system, or both aspects at once.
期刊最新文献
Categorical and Continuous Features in Counterfactual Explanations of AI Systems ID.8: Co-Creating Visual Stories with Generative AI Visualization for Recommendation Explainability: A Survey and New Perspectives Unpacking Human-AI interactions: From interaction primitives to a design space AutoRL X: Automated Reinforcement Learning on the Web
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1