Testing using CSP Models: Time, Inputs, and Outputs

IF 0.7 4区 数学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS ACM Transactions on Computational Logic Pub Date : 2023-01-28 DOI:https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3572837
James Baxter, Ana Cavalcanti, Maciej Gazda, Robert M. Hierons
{"title":"Testing using CSP Models: Time, Inputs, and Outputs","authors":"James Baxter, Ana Cavalcanti, Maciej Gazda, Robert M. Hierons","doi":"https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3572837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The existing testing theories for CSP cater for verification of interaction patterns (traces) and deadlocks, but not time. We address here refinement and testing based on a dialect of CSP, called <i>tock</i>-CSP, which can capture discrete time properties. This version of CSP has been of widespread interest for decades; recently, it has been given a denotational semantics, and model checking has become possible using a well established tool. Here, we first equip <i>tock</i>-CSP with a novel semantics for testing, which distinguishes input and output events: the standard models of (<i>tock</i>-)CSP do not differentiate them, but for testing this is essential. We then present a new testing theory for timewise refinement, based on novel definitions of test and test execution. Finally, we reconcile refinement and testing by relating timed ioco testing and refinement in <i>tock</i>-CSP with inputs and outputs. With these results, this paper provides, for the first time, a systematic theory that allows both timed testing and timed refinement to be expressed. An important practical consequence is that this ensures that the notion of correctness used by developers guarantees that tests pass when applied to a correct system and, in addition, faults identified during testing correspond to development mistakes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50916,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Computational Logic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Computational Logic","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3572837","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The existing testing theories for CSP cater for verification of interaction patterns (traces) and deadlocks, but not time. We address here refinement and testing based on a dialect of CSP, called tock-CSP, which can capture discrete time properties. This version of CSP has been of widespread interest for decades; recently, it has been given a denotational semantics, and model checking has become possible using a well established tool. Here, we first equip tock-CSP with a novel semantics for testing, which distinguishes input and output events: the standard models of (tock-)CSP do not differentiate them, but for testing this is essential. We then present a new testing theory for timewise refinement, based on novel definitions of test and test execution. Finally, we reconcile refinement and testing by relating timed ioco testing and refinement in tock-CSP with inputs and outputs. With these results, this paper provides, for the first time, a systematic theory that allows both timed testing and timed refinement to be expressed. An important practical consequence is that this ensures that the notion of correctness used by developers guarantees that tests pass when applied to a correct system and, in addition, faults identified during testing correspond to development mistakes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用CSP模型进行测试:时间、输入和输出
现有的CSP测试理论用于验证交互模式(跟踪)和死锁,而不是时间。我们在这里讨论基于CSP方言的改进和测试,称为stock -CSP,它可以捕获离散时间属性。几十年来,这个版本的CSP一直受到广泛关注;最近,它被赋予了指称语义,并且可以使用一个完善的工具进行模型检查。在这里,我们首先为stock -CSP配备了一种用于测试的新语义,它区分了输入和输出事件:(stock -)CSP的标准模型不区分它们,但对于测试来说,这是必不可少的。然后,基于测试和测试执行的新定义,我们提出了一种新的时间优化测试理论。最后,我们通过将stock - csp中的定时ioco测试和改进与输入和输出相关联来协调改进和测试。有了这些结果,本文第一次提供了一个系统的理论,允许同时表示定时测试和定时细化。一个重要的实际结果是,这确保了开发人员使用的正确性概念保证了测试在应用于正确的系统时通过,此外,在测试期间识别的错误与开发错误相对应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Computational Logic
ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: TOCL welcomes submissions related to all aspects of logic as it pertains to topics in computer science. This area has a great tradition in computer science. Several researchers who earned the ACM Turing award have also contributed to this field, namely Edgar Codd (relational database systems), Stephen Cook (complexity of logical theories), Edsger W. Dijkstra, Robert W. Floyd, Tony Hoare, Amir Pnueli, Dana Scott, Edmond M. Clarke, Allen E. Emerson, and Joseph Sifakis (program logics, program derivation and verification, programming languages semantics), Robin Milner (interactive theorem proving, concurrency calculi, and functional programming), and John McCarthy (functional programming and logics in AI). Logic continues to play an important role in computer science and has permeated several of its areas, including artificial intelligence, computational complexity, database systems, and programming languages. The Editorial Board of this journal seeks and hopes to attract high-quality submissions in all the above-mentioned areas of computational logic so that TOCL becomes the standard reference in the field. Both theoretical and applied papers are sought. Submissions showing novel use of logic in computer science are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
Computationally Hard Problems for Logic Programs under Answer Set Semantics Fundamental Logic is Decidable SAT Modulo Symmetries for Graph Generation and Enumeration Strong Backdoors for Default Logic One or Nothing: Anti-unification over the Simply-Typed Lambda Calculus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1