Typed–Untyped Interactions: A Comparative Analysis

IF 1.5 2区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems Pub Date : 2023-03-05 DOI:https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3579833
Ben Greenman, Christos Dimoulas, Matthias Felleisen
{"title":"Typed–Untyped Interactions: A Comparative Analysis","authors":"Ben Greenman, Christos Dimoulas, Matthias Felleisen","doi":"https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3579833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The literature presents many strategies for enforcing the integrity of types when typed code interacts with untyped code. This article presents a uniform evaluation framework that characterizes the differences among some major existing semantics for typed–untyped interaction. Type system designers can use this framework to analyze the guarantees of their own dynamic semantics.</p>","PeriodicalId":50939,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems","volume":"265 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3579833","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The literature presents many strategies for enforcing the integrity of types when typed code interacts with untyped code. This article presents a uniform evaluation framework that characterizes the differences among some major existing semantics for typed–untyped interaction. Type system designers can use this framework to analyze the guarantees of their own dynamic semantics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
类型-非类型交互:比较分析
文献中提出了许多在类型化代码与非类型化代码交互时强制类型完整性的策略。本文提出了一个统一的评估框架,它描述了类型-非类型交互的一些主要现有语义之间的差异。类型系统设计者可以使用这个框架来分析他们自己的动态语义的保证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems
ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS) is the premier journal for reporting recent research advances in the areas of programming languages, and systems to assist the task of programming. Papers can be either theoretical or experimental in style, but in either case, they must contain innovative and novel content that advances the state of the art of programming languages and systems. We also invite strictly experimental papers that compare existing approaches, as well as tutorial and survey papers. The scope of TOPLAS includes, but is not limited to, the following subjects: language design for sequential and parallel programming programming language implementation programming language semantics compilers and interpreters runtime systems for program execution storage allocation and garbage collection languages and methods for writing program specifications languages and methods for secure and reliable programs testing and verification of programs
期刊最新文献
Proving Correctness of Parallel Implementations of Transition System Models CFLOBDDs: Context-Free-Language Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams Adversities in Abstract Interpretation: Accommodating Robustness by Abstract Interpretation: ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems: Vol 0, No ja Homeostasis: Design and Implementation of a Self-Stabilizing Compiler Locally Abstract, Globally Concrete Semantics of Concurrent Programming Languages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1