Optimal execution with stochastic delay

IF 1.1 2区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Finance and Stochastics Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1007/s00780-022-00491-w
Álvaro Cartea, Leandro Sánchez-Betancourt
{"title":"Optimal execution with stochastic delay","authors":"Álvaro Cartea, Leandro Sánchez-Betancourt","doi":"10.1007/s00780-022-00491-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We show how traders use marketable limit orders (MLOs) to liquidate a position over a trading window when there is latency in the marketplace. MLOs are liquidity-taking orders that specify a price limit and are for immediate execution only; however, if the price limit of the MLO precludes it from being filled, the exchange cancels the order. We frame our model as an impulse control problem with stochastic latency where the trader controls the times and the price limits of the MLOs sent to the exchange. We show that impatient liquidity takers submit MLOs that may walk the book (capped by the limit price) to increase the probability of filling the trades. On the other hand, patient liquidity takers use speculative MLOs that are only filled if there has been an advantageous move in prices over the latency period. Patient traders who are fast do not use their speed to hit the quotes they observe, or to finish the execution programme early; they use speed to complete the execution programme with as many speculative MLOs as possible. We use foreign exchange data to implement the random-latency-optimal strategy and to compare it with four benchmarks. For patient traders, the random-latency-optimal strategy outperforms the benchmarks by an amount that is greater than the transaction costs paid by liquidity takers in foreign exchange markets. Around news announcements, the value of the outperformance is between two and ten times the value of the transaction costs. The superiority of the strategy is due to both the speculative MLOs that are filled and the price protection of the MLOs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50447,"journal":{"name":"Finance and Stochastics","volume":"90 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finance and Stochastics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-022-00491-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We show how traders use marketable limit orders (MLOs) to liquidate a position over a trading window when there is latency in the marketplace. MLOs are liquidity-taking orders that specify a price limit and are for immediate execution only; however, if the price limit of the MLO precludes it from being filled, the exchange cancels the order. We frame our model as an impulse control problem with stochastic latency where the trader controls the times and the price limits of the MLOs sent to the exchange. We show that impatient liquidity takers submit MLOs that may walk the book (capped by the limit price) to increase the probability of filling the trades. On the other hand, patient liquidity takers use speculative MLOs that are only filled if there has been an advantageous move in prices over the latency period. Patient traders who are fast do not use their speed to hit the quotes they observe, or to finish the execution programme early; they use speed to complete the execution programme with as many speculative MLOs as possible. We use foreign exchange data to implement the random-latency-optimal strategy and to compare it with four benchmarks. For patient traders, the random-latency-optimal strategy outperforms the benchmarks by an amount that is greater than the transaction costs paid by liquidity takers in foreign exchange markets. Around news announcements, the value of the outperformance is between two and ten times the value of the transaction costs. The superiority of the strategy is due to both the speculative MLOs that are filled and the price protection of the MLOs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有随机延迟的最优执行
我们展示了当市场存在延迟时,交易者如何使用可交易限价单(MLOs)在交易窗口上平仓。mlo是指定价格限制并仅供立即执行的流动性接受订单;但是,如果MLO的价格限制使其无法填写,则交易所取消订单。我们将模型构建为具有随机延迟的脉冲控制问题,其中交易者控制发送到交易所的MLOs的时间和价格限制。我们表明,不耐烦的流动性接受者提交的MLOs可能会走账(由限价限制),以增加填充交易的概率。另一方面,耐心的流动性接受者使用投机性MLOs,这些MLOs只有在价格在潜伏期内有有利变动时才会被填充。耐心的快速交易者不会利用他们的速度来达到他们观察到的报价,或者提前完成执行程序;他们利用速度来完成执行程序,并尽可能多地进行投机。我们使用外汇数据来实现随机延迟最优策略,并将其与四个基准进行比较。对于耐心的交易者来说,随机延迟最优策略比基准策略的表现要好得多,比外汇市场上流动性接受者支付的交易成本还要高。在新闻发布期间,业绩优胜的价值是交易成本价值的2到10倍。该策略的优势在于其所填充的投机性MLOs和MLOs的价格保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Finance and Stochastics
Finance and Stochastics 管理科学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
20
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of Finance and Stochastics is to provide a high standard publication forum for research - in all areas of finance based on stochastic methods - on specific topics in mathematics (in particular probability theory, statistics and stochastic analysis) motivated by the analysis of problems in finance. Finance and Stochastics encompasses - but is not limited to - the following fields: - theory and analysis of financial markets - continuous time finance - derivatives research - insurance in relation to finance - portfolio selection - credit and market risks - term structure models - statistical and empirical financial studies based on advanced stochastic methods - numerical and stochastic solution techniques for problems in finance - intertemporal economics, uncertainty and information in relation to finance.
期刊最新文献
On the Guyon–Lekeufack volatility model Stationary covariance regime for affine stochastic covariance models in Hilbert spaces Robustness of Hilbert space-valued stochastic volatility models A Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard model with leverage in Hilbert space for commodity forward markets Cost-efficient payoffs under model ambiguity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1