Service system resilience under resource scarcity: from vulnerability to balanced centricity

IF 3.8 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Services Marketing Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1108/jsm-01-2023-0024
Henna M. Leino, Janet Davey, Raechel Johns
{"title":"Service system resilience under resource scarcity: from vulnerability to balanced centricity","authors":"Henna M. Leino, Janet Davey, Raechel Johns","doi":"10.1108/jsm-01-2023-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Disruptive shocks significantly compromise service contexts, challenging multidimensional value (co)creation. Recent focus has been on consumers experiencing vulnerability in service contexts. However, the susceptibility of service firms, employees and other actors to the impacts of disruptive shocks has received little attention. Since resource scarcity from disruptive shocks heightens tensions around balancing different needs in the service system, this paper aims to propose a framework of balanced centricity and service system resilience for service sustainability.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Adopting a conceptual model process, the paper integrates resilience and balanced centricity (method theories) with customer/consumer vulnerability (domain theory) resulting in a definition of multiactor vulnerability and related theoretical propositions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Depleted, unavailable, or competed over resources among multiple actors constrain resource integration. Disruptive shocks nevertheless have upside potential. The interdependencies of actors in the service system call for deeper examination of multiple parties’ susceptibility to disruptive resource scarcity. The conceptual framework integrates multiactor vulnerability (when multiactor susceptibility to resource scarcity challenges value exchange) with processes of service system resilience, developing three research propositions. Emerging research questions and strategies for balanced centricity provide a research agenda.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>A multiactor, balanced centricity perspective extends understanding of value cocreation, service resilience and service sustainability. Strategies for anticipating, coping with and adapting to disruptions in service systems are suggested by using the balanced centricity perspective, offering the potential to maintain (or enhance) the six types of value.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This research defines multiactor vulnerability, extending work on experienced vulnerabilities; describes the multilevel and multiactor perspective on experienced vulnerability in service relationships; and conceptualizes how balanced centricity can decrease multiactor vulnerability and increase service system resilience when mega disruptions occur.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Services Marketing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Services Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jsm-01-2023-0024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Disruptive shocks significantly compromise service contexts, challenging multidimensional value (co)creation. Recent focus has been on consumers experiencing vulnerability in service contexts. However, the susceptibility of service firms, employees and other actors to the impacts of disruptive shocks has received little attention. Since resource scarcity from disruptive shocks heightens tensions around balancing different needs in the service system, this paper aims to propose a framework of balanced centricity and service system resilience for service sustainability.

Design/methodology/approach

Adopting a conceptual model process, the paper integrates resilience and balanced centricity (method theories) with customer/consumer vulnerability (domain theory) resulting in a definition of multiactor vulnerability and related theoretical propositions.

Findings

Depleted, unavailable, or competed over resources among multiple actors constrain resource integration. Disruptive shocks nevertheless have upside potential. The interdependencies of actors in the service system call for deeper examination of multiple parties’ susceptibility to disruptive resource scarcity. The conceptual framework integrates multiactor vulnerability (when multiactor susceptibility to resource scarcity challenges value exchange) with processes of service system resilience, developing three research propositions. Emerging research questions and strategies for balanced centricity provide a research agenda.

Research limitations/implications

A multiactor, balanced centricity perspective extends understanding of value cocreation, service resilience and service sustainability. Strategies for anticipating, coping with and adapting to disruptions in service systems are suggested by using the balanced centricity perspective, offering the potential to maintain (or enhance) the six types of value.

Originality/value

This research defines multiactor vulnerability, extending work on experienced vulnerabilities; describes the multilevel and multiactor perspective on experienced vulnerability in service relationships; and conceptualizes how balanced centricity can decrease multiactor vulnerability and increase service system resilience when mega disruptions occur.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
资源稀缺下的服务系统弹性:从脆弱性到平衡中心性
目的破坏性冲击严重损害了服务环境,挑战了多维价值(co)的创造。最近的焦点是在服务环境中遇到漏洞的消费者。然而,服务公司、雇员和其他行为者对破坏性冲击影响的敏感性却很少受到关注。由于破坏性冲击带来的资源稀缺性加剧了服务系统中平衡不同需求的紧张关系,本文旨在提出一个平衡中心性和服务系统弹性的框架,以实现服务的可持续性。设计/方法/方法采用概念模型过程,将弹性和平衡中心性(方法理论)与客户/消费者脆弱性(领域理论)相结合,得出多因素脆弱性的定义和相关理论命题。发现在多个参与者之间耗尽、不可用或竞争资源限制了资源集成。然而,破坏性冲击具有上行潜力。服务系统中行为者的相互依赖性要求对多方对破坏性资源稀缺的敏感性进行更深入的研究。该概念框架将多因素脆弱性(当多因素对资源稀缺的敏感性挑战价值交换时)与服务系统弹性过程相结合,提出了三个研究命题。新兴的研究问题和平衡中心性的策略提供了一个研究议程。多因素、平衡的中心性视角扩展了对价值共同创造、服务弹性和服务可持续性的理解。通过使用平衡的中心性观点,提出了预测、应对和适应服务系统中断的策略,提供了维持(或增强)六种类型价值的潜力。原创性/价值本研究定义了多参与者漏洞,扩展了对经验漏洞的研究;描述了服务关系中经验脆弱性的多层次和多因素视角;并概念化了平衡中心性如何在发生大规模中断时减少多因素脆弱性并增加服务系统的弹性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
20.50%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: ■Customer policy and service ■Marketing of services ■Marketing planning ■Service marketing abroad ■Service quality Capturing and retaining customers in a service industry is a vastly different activity to its product-based counterpart. The fickle nature of today"s consumer is a vital factor in understanding the factors which determine successful holding of market share - and the intense competition within the sector means practitioners must keep pace with new developments if they are to outwit competitors and develop customer loyalty.
期刊最新文献
Cite me! Perspectives on coercive citation in reviewing Editorial: Embracing the future of services marketing Customer churn analysis using feature optimization methods and tree-based classifiers Low-income consumers’ informal and formal financial service experiences: perceptions of access, inclusion, and social dependence Enhancing customer engagement behaviors via customer-to-customer interactions and identification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1