Exemplars in ‘science and religion’: a theological dialogue with Thomas Kuhn

IF 0.5 2区 哲学 0 RELIGION RELIGIOUS STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-11-28 DOI:10.1017/s0034412523000975
Josh A. Reeves
{"title":"Exemplars in ‘science and religion’: a theological dialogue with Thomas Kuhn","authors":"Josh A. Reeves","doi":"10.1017/s0034412523000975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that Thomas Kuhn's landmark work, <jats:italic>The Structure of Scientific Revolutions</jats:italic>, has not been adequately explored by theologians and scholars in the field of science and religion. While many cite Kuhn to suggest that science and religion share structural similarities, I contend that his work is crucial in addressing current debates about the definitions of ‘science’ and ‘religion’ and the potential for intellectual progress between them. Kuhn's framework provides more than a justification for adhering to incommensurable worldviews; it offers a nuanced understanding of how science and religion interact and the significance of tacit knowledge in scientific practice. This article explains Kuhn's focus on exemplars in his philosophy of science, which underpin his argument for key differences between science and theological inquiry. The article concludes that Kuhn's pluralistic view of truth offers theologians an opportunity to engage more deeply with science, rather than sidestepping it entirely.","PeriodicalId":45888,"journal":{"name":"RELIGIOUS STUDIES","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RELIGIOUS STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1095","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034412523000975","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article argues that Thomas Kuhn's landmark work, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, has not been adequately explored by theologians and scholars in the field of science and religion. While many cite Kuhn to suggest that science and religion share structural similarities, I contend that his work is crucial in addressing current debates about the definitions of ‘science’ and ‘religion’ and the potential for intellectual progress between them. Kuhn's framework provides more than a justification for adhering to incommensurable worldviews; it offers a nuanced understanding of how science and religion interact and the significance of tacit knowledge in scientific practice. This article explains Kuhn's focus on exemplars in his philosophy of science, which underpin his argument for key differences between science and theological inquiry. The article concludes that Kuhn's pluralistic view of truth offers theologians an opportunity to engage more deeply with science, rather than sidestepping it entirely.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《科学与宗教》的典范:与托马斯·库恩的神学对话
本文认为,科学和宗教领域的神学家和学者尚未对托马斯·库恩的里程碑式著作《科学革命的结构》进行充分的探讨。虽然许多人引用库恩的观点,认为科学和宗教在结构上有相似之处,但我认为他的工作对于解决当前关于“科学”和“宗教”定义的争论以及它们之间智力进步的潜力至关重要。库恩的框架不仅为坚持不可通约的世界观提供了理由;它提供了对科学和宗教如何相互作用以及隐性知识在科学实践中的重要性的细致入微的理解。这篇文章解释了库恩在他的科学哲学中对范例的关注,这支撑了他关于科学和神学探究之间关键差异的论点。文章的结论是,库恩的多元真理观为神学家提供了一个更深入地参与科学的机会,而不是完全回避科学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
RELIGIOUS STUDIES
RELIGIOUS STUDIES RELIGION-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Religious Studies is an international journal devoted to the problems of the philosophy of religion as they arise out of classical and contemporary discussions and from varied religious traditions. More than 25 articles are published each year, and the journal also contains an extensive book review section.
期刊最新文献
One goodness, many goodnesses, and the Divine Ideas Imitation Theory Divine contradiction: fascinating but unpersuasive Divine Contradiction: some snippets Divine Contradiction: replies to critics Divine command theory and the (supposed) incoherence of self-commanding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1