Exploring barriers and strategies for improving sexual and reproductive health access for young men in Sweden: Insights from healthcare providers in youth clinics

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare Pub Date : 2023-12-06 DOI:10.1016/j.srhc.2023.100942
Johanna Pettersson, Mazen Baroudi
{"title":"Exploring barriers and strategies for improving sexual and reproductive health access for young men in Sweden: Insights from healthcare providers in youth clinics","authors":"Johanna Pettersson,&nbsp;Mazen Baroudi","doi":"10.1016/j.srhc.2023.100942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Youth clinics in Sweden are not reaching young men to the same extent as young women. We conducted a qualitative study to explore healthcare providers’ (HCPs) perspectives on the barriers to young men’s access to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services and how youth clinics can better accommodate the needs of young men. We used thematic analysis to analyze eight interviews with nine HCPs (three men and six women).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We developed three themes: 1) It’s about the youth clinics and those working in them—the clinics suffered from low organizational support, which affected their ability to accommodate young men’s needs and were perceived as “<em>girls’ clinics</em>”. Midwifery, which is the main profession of HCPs working with SRH in the clinics, was perceived as a women’s profession for women’s SRH; 2) It’s not all about the youth clinics—young men were perceived as lacking essential knowledge about SRH and gender norms were preventing young men from visiting youth clinics; 3) Organizational strategies for improving access—the participants discussed strategies to attract young men, including separate reception for young men, hiring more male staff, having higher age limits for young men, and digital solutions to address privacy concerns.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is a need for societal efforts to increase young men’s knowledge about SRH and improve their access to SRH services. Several strategies can be adapted by youth clinics to attract more young men but there is need for further research to design and evaluate such interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54199,"journal":{"name":"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877575623001325/pdfft?md5=ce7935aa5503bd81cf5affab2429749c&pid=1-s2.0-S1877575623001325-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877575623001325","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Methods

Youth clinics in Sweden are not reaching young men to the same extent as young women. We conducted a qualitative study to explore healthcare providers’ (HCPs) perspectives on the barriers to young men’s access to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services and how youth clinics can better accommodate the needs of young men. We used thematic analysis to analyze eight interviews with nine HCPs (three men and six women).

Results

We developed three themes: 1) It’s about the youth clinics and those working in them—the clinics suffered from low organizational support, which affected their ability to accommodate young men’s needs and were perceived as “girls’ clinics”. Midwifery, which is the main profession of HCPs working with SRH in the clinics, was perceived as a women’s profession for women’s SRH; 2) It’s not all about the youth clinics—young men were perceived as lacking essential knowledge about SRH and gender norms were preventing young men from visiting youth clinics; 3) Organizational strategies for improving access—the participants discussed strategies to attract young men, including separate reception for young men, hiring more male staff, having higher age limits for young men, and digital solutions to address privacy concerns.

Conclusion

There is a need for societal efforts to increase young men’s knowledge about SRH and improve their access to SRH services. Several strategies can be adapted by youth clinics to attract more young men but there is need for further research to design and evaluate such interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索改善瑞典青年男子获得性健康和生殖健康的障碍和战略:来自青年诊所保健提供者的见解
方法瑞典的青年诊所对年轻男性的覆盖程度不如对年轻女性。我们进行了一项定性研究,探讨医疗保健提供者(HCPs)对年轻男性获得性健康和生殖健康(SRH)服务的障碍的看法,以及青年诊所如何更好地满足年轻男性的需求。我们使用专题分析来分析对9名HCPs(3名男性和6名女性)的8次访谈。结果我们发展了三个主题:1)关于青年诊所及其工作人员——诊所受到低组织支持的影响,影响了他们满足年轻男性需求的能力,被认为是“女孩诊所”。助产是在诊所与性健康和生殖健康合作的医务人员的主要职业,被认为是女性性健康和生殖健康的女性职业;(2)并非所有问题都与青年诊所有关——年轻男性被认为缺乏性健康与生殖健康的基本知识,性别规范阻碍了年轻男性前往青年诊所;3)改善访问的组织策略——与会者讨论了吸引年轻男性的策略,包括单独接待年轻男性、雇佣更多男性员工、提高年轻男性的年龄限制,以及解决隐私问题的数字解决方案。结论社会需要努力提高年轻男性对性生殖健康的认识,改善他们获得性生殖健康服务的机会。青年诊所可以采用一些策略来吸引更多的年轻男性,但是需要进一步研究来设计和评估这些干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
73
审稿时长
45 days
期刊最新文献
Investigating the associations between early labour onset symptoms and self-diagnosed labour onset in a cohort study of primiparas Overuse of intrapartum CTG monitoring in low-risk women in Norway Editorial Board The conclusion of CTG overuse is not justified Hysterectomy and medical financial hardship among U.S. women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1