Association Between Beta Blocker and Clinical Outcome in Adult Patients with Sepsis or Septic Shock: Protocol of a Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Sulagna Bhattacharjee, Emmanuel Easterson Ernest, Souvik Maitra
{"title":"Association Between Beta Blocker and Clinical Outcome in Adult Patients with Sepsis or Septic Shock: Protocol of a Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials","authors":"Sulagna Bhattacharjee, Emmanuel Easterson Ernest, Souvik Maitra","doi":"10.1101/2023.11.14.23298548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Use of beta-blockers as a part of heart rate control strategy is sepsis and septic shock patients is of great debate. Despite of early encouraging results, no large trial was performed and several subsequent small studies reported conflicting results. This meta-analysis and systematic review will be conducted and published as per PRISMA guidelines. In this review, randomized controlled trials comparing short-acting beta-blockers with standard of care in adult patients with sepsis and septic shock will be included. Primary outcome will be 28- day mortality and secondary outcomes will be duration of intensive care unit stay, duration of hospital stay, ICU mortality, hospital mortality and reported adverse events. A random effect model will be used for all analysis.","PeriodicalId":501249,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine","volume":"60 29","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.14.23298548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Use of beta-blockers as a part of heart rate control strategy is sepsis and septic shock patients is of great debate. Despite of early encouraging results, no large trial was performed and several subsequent small studies reported conflicting results. This meta-analysis and systematic review will be conducted and published as per PRISMA guidelines. In this review, randomized controlled trials comparing short-acting beta-blockers with standard of care in adult patients with sepsis and septic shock will be included. Primary outcome will be 28- day mortality and secondary outcomes will be duration of intensive care unit stay, duration of hospital stay, ICU mortality, hospital mortality and reported adverse events. A random effect model will be used for all analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人脓毒症或感染性休克患者-受体阻滞剂与临床结局的关系:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
使用受体阻滞剂作为心率控制策略的一部分是脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者是很大的争论。尽管早期的结果令人鼓舞,但没有进行大型试验,随后的几项小型研究报告了相互矛盾的结果。本荟萃分析和系统评价将按照PRISMA指南进行并发表。在本综述中,将纳入比较短效β受体阻滞剂与标准治疗成人脓毒症和感染性休克的随机对照试验。主要结局是28天死亡率,次要结局是重症监护病房住院时间、住院时间、ICU死亡率、住院死亡率和报告的不良事件。所有分析将采用随机效应模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Postoperative 20% Albumin and Cardiac Surgery Associated Kidney Injury, Statistical Analysis Plan and Updated Protocol Exploring the impact of a context-adapted decision aid and online training about shared decision making about goals of care with elderly patients in the intensive care unit: a mixed-methods study Pulmonary inflammation in severe pneumonia is characterised by compartmentalised and mechanistically distinct sub-phenotypes Perioperative albumin versus other fluids to prevent cardiac surgery associated kidney injury: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials The impact of burn trauma on glycocalyx derangement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1