What Do Major Stakeholders Really Think? Business English Students’ Perceptions About Problem-Based Learning

Andreea Rosca
{"title":"What Do Major Stakeholders Really Think? Business English Students’ Perceptions About Problem-Based Learning","authors":"Andreea Rosca","doi":"10.18485/esptoday.2019.7.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study emerged from the need to give more visibility to business disciplines in connection with problem-based learning (PBL) and to give voice to students, who may be regarded as the major stakeholders in a PBL project. This article examines students’ perceptions and attitudes towards the implementation of a PBL project in the subject of Business English. We analyze the results obtained from a student questionnaire that was administered at the end of a 9-week experiment. Overall, feedback was positive as most students rated this methodology as good or very good and envisaged the possibility of applying it to theoretical subjects of their own degree. Some of the frustrations expressed by students were uncooperative team members, the lack of direction associated with insecurity about the performance of activities, boredom caused by the lack of variety in writings, and the difficulty to find the right solutions. We believe that future PBL programs should take into account students’ criticism and suggestions for improvement. Therefore, teachers should consider allotting sufficient time for the performance of activities, including a larger pool of writing activities, more personalized feedback on students’ writings and using a more appealing wording","PeriodicalId":501121,"journal":{"name":"ESP Today","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESP Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2019.7.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The present study emerged from the need to give more visibility to business disciplines in connection with problem-based learning (PBL) and to give voice to students, who may be regarded as the major stakeholders in a PBL project. This article examines students’ perceptions and attitudes towards the implementation of a PBL project in the subject of Business English. We analyze the results obtained from a student questionnaire that was administered at the end of a 9-week experiment. Overall, feedback was positive as most students rated this methodology as good or very good and envisaged the possibility of applying it to theoretical subjects of their own degree. Some of the frustrations expressed by students were uncooperative team members, the lack of direction associated with insecurity about the performance of activities, boredom caused by the lack of variety in writings, and the difficulty to find the right solutions. We believe that future PBL programs should take into account students’ criticism and suggestions for improvement. Therefore, teachers should consider allotting sufficient time for the performance of activities, including a larger pool of writing activities, more personalized feedback on students’ writings and using a more appealing wording
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主要利益相关者到底是怎么想的?商务英语学生对基于问题的学习的认知
本研究源于对与基于问题的学习(PBL)相关的商业学科给予更多可见性的需要,并给予学生发言权,他们可能被视为PBL项目的主要利益相关者。这篇文章考察了学生对在商务英语科目中实施PBL项目的看法和态度。我们分析从学生问卷中获得的结果,该问卷是在为期9周的实验结束时进行的。总的来说,反馈是积极的,因为大多数学生认为这种方法很好或非常好,并设想将其应用于自己学位的理论科目的可能性。学生们表达的一些挫折感是团队成员不合作,对活动表现缺乏安全感而缺乏方向,由于写作缺乏多样性而产生的无聊,以及难以找到正确的解决方案。我们认为未来的PBL项目应该考虑到学生的批评和改进建议。因此,教师应该考虑为活动的表现分配足够的时间,包括更大的写作活动池,对学生的写作进行更个性化的反馈,使用更吸引人的措辞
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Project-Based Translation of Wikipedia Articles in a Tertiary ESP Context: Planning, Execution and Lessons Learnt Constructing an Argument in Academic Writing Across Disciplines Investigating Student Motivation in the Use of Corpus Concordancing in ESP Learning at University Level Improving Oral Production Skills in the Business English Class Through Creative Dubbing Self-Denigration in Doctoral Defense Sessions: Scale Development and Validation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1