Seeds for New Beginnings? Ecological Uncertainty, Blurry Ideology, and Speculative Design at the Universitas Symposium, 1972

IF 0.3 4区 艺术学 0 ART Journal of Design History Pub Date : 2023-11-25 DOI:10.1093/jdh/epad040
Ingrid Halland
{"title":"Seeds for New Beginnings? Ecological Uncertainty, Blurry Ideology, and Speculative Design at the Universitas Symposium, 1972","authors":"Ingrid Halland","doi":"10.1093/jdh/epad040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1972, designer Emilio Ambasz (b. 1943) organized the symposium “The Universitas Project” at MoMA in New York City. The issue at stake was how the field of design should tackle the possibly irresolvable societal, political, and ecological problems of post-industrial society. Ambasz proposed a new design approach, which he named design as a mode of thought, with the aim of building a new research-education institution for design that could tackle the wicked problems ahead. In order to articulate his proposal, Ambasz turned to the speculative realm: discursive design critique, metaphysical cybernetics, design fiction, and storytelling. By critically engaging with some of the participants’ conference presentations, the article first discusses how the concept of the environment was reconfigured by the emerging ecological catastrophe. Then the article discusses ideological responses to the Universitas Project to show how the seemingly different ideological positions between French so-called “radical left” and American “right-wing technocrats” were grounded in the same; all-encompassing uncertainty and a strive for open-endedness. Finally, the article analyses Ambasz’s design fiction writing and the speculative nature of the Universitas and thereby identifies the Universitas as a rare moment in the history of design in which design stopped engaging in the status quo and turned towards a speculative future for finding seeds for new beginnings. The article re-visits the Universitas in order to support a presentist argument: that speculation, discursive design critique, and storytelling might not be sufficient methods on their own to tackle the forthcoming accelerating wicked uncertainties that lie ahead.","PeriodicalId":45088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Design History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Design History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jdh/epad040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1972, designer Emilio Ambasz (b. 1943) organized the symposium “The Universitas Project” at MoMA in New York City. The issue at stake was how the field of design should tackle the possibly irresolvable societal, political, and ecological problems of post-industrial society. Ambasz proposed a new design approach, which he named design as a mode of thought, with the aim of building a new research-education institution for design that could tackle the wicked problems ahead. In order to articulate his proposal, Ambasz turned to the speculative realm: discursive design critique, metaphysical cybernetics, design fiction, and storytelling. By critically engaging with some of the participants’ conference presentations, the article first discusses how the concept of the environment was reconfigured by the emerging ecological catastrophe. Then the article discusses ideological responses to the Universitas Project to show how the seemingly different ideological positions between French so-called “radical left” and American “right-wing technocrats” were grounded in the same; all-encompassing uncertainty and a strive for open-endedness. Finally, the article analyses Ambasz’s design fiction writing and the speculative nature of the Universitas and thereby identifies the Universitas as a rare moment in the history of design in which design stopped engaging in the status quo and turned towards a speculative future for finding seeds for new beginnings. The article re-visits the Universitas in order to support a presentist argument: that speculation, discursive design critique, and storytelling might not be sufficient methods on their own to tackle the forthcoming accelerating wicked uncertainties that lie ahead.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新开始的种子?生态不确定性,模糊的意识形态,和投机设计在大学研讨会,1972
1972年,设计师Emilio Ambasz(生于1943年)在纽约现代艺术博物馆组织了一个名为“Universitas Project”的研讨会。这个问题的关键在于设计领域应该如何解决后工业社会可能无法解决的社会、政治和生态问题。Ambasz提出了一种新的设计方法,他把设计命名为一种思维模式,目的是建立一个新的设计研究教育机构,以解决未来的棘手问题。为了阐明他的建议,Ambasz转向了思辨领域:话语设计批判、形而上学控制论、设计小说和讲故事。通过批判性地参与一些与会者的会议演讲,文章首先讨论了环境概念是如何被新兴的生态灾难重新配置的。然后,文章讨论了对大学计划的意识形态回应,以表明法国所谓的“激进左翼”和美国“右翼技术官僚”之间看似不同的意识形态立场是如何建立在相同的基础上的;无所不包的不确定性和对开放性的追求。最后,文章分析了Ambasz的设计小说写作和Universitas的思辨性,从而将Universitas确定为设计历史上罕见的时刻,在这个时刻,设计停止了对现状的参与,转向了一个思辨的未来,为新的开始寻找种子。这篇文章重新访问了Universitas,以支持一个现代主义的论点:猜测、话语式设计批评和讲故事可能不足以解决即将到来的加速邪恶的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Journal of Design History is a leading journal in its field. It plays an active role in the development of design history (including the history of the crafts and applied arts), as well as contributing to the broader field of studies of visual and material culture. The journal includes a regular book reviews section and lists books received, and from time to time publishes special issues.
期刊最新文献
Charlotte Benton 1944 – 2024 Listening to things and spaces: Sound archives for design historians The Full-Length Mirror: A Global Visual History Arndís Sigríður Árnadóttir 1940-2023 Julia Keiner’s Universalism and the Question of Israeli style
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1