Thaíse Virgínia Freire Ramos Peixoto, Alexandre Carneiro Leão de Mello, Mércia Virginia Ferreira dos Santos, Márcio Vieira da Cunha, Rejane Magalhães de Mendonça Pimentel, Luiz Henrique Gonçalves da Silva, Djalma Euzébio Simões Filho, Janerson José Coelho
{"title":"Histological arrangements of plant tissue of different elephant grasses as influenced by their genotypes","authors":"Thaíse Virgínia Freire Ramos Peixoto, Alexandre Carneiro Leão de Mello, Mércia Virginia Ferreira dos Santos, Márcio Vieira da Cunha, Rejane Magalhães de Mendonça Pimentel, Luiz Henrique Gonçalves da Silva, Djalma Euzébio Simões Filho, Janerson José Coelho","doi":"10.2989/10220119.2022.2135592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Elephant grass genotypes display a variety of morphological differences, influencing the nutritive value of the forage. This study evaluated the histological arrangements of the leaves and stems of different elephant-grass genotypes, two tall-sized (Elephant B and IRI-381) and two dwarfs (Mott and Taiwan A-146 2.37), during a two-year trial. The grasses were harvested at 60-day intervals for two years. Biometric analyses of the stems and leaves were performed based on histological measurements. An <i>in vitro</i> dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) assay of the forage was performed. Among the elephant grass genotypes, the lignified cells and vascular bundles of the stems had higher variation than the leaves. Tall-sized genotypes displayed more lignified tissues in stems than the dwarfs. The transversal area occupied by vascular bundles and lignified cells were higher in Elephant B (44 911 μm<sup>2</sup> and 35 895 μm<sup>2</sup>) (<i>p</i> < 0.05), compared to the dwarfs. Forage IVDMD was higher in leaves (699 g kg<sup>−1</sup> of dry matter [DM]) than in the stems (678 g kg<sup>−1</sup> of DM), considering all genotypes (<i>p</i> < 0.05). We did not observe any direct influence of genotype on forage digestibility, despite some differences in the histological arrangements.</p>","PeriodicalId":50841,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Range & Forage Science","volume":"30 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Range & Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2989/10220119.2022.2135592","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Elephant grass genotypes display a variety of morphological differences, influencing the nutritive value of the forage. This study evaluated the histological arrangements of the leaves and stems of different elephant-grass genotypes, two tall-sized (Elephant B and IRI-381) and two dwarfs (Mott and Taiwan A-146 2.37), during a two-year trial. The grasses were harvested at 60-day intervals for two years. Biometric analyses of the stems and leaves were performed based on histological measurements. An in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) assay of the forage was performed. Among the elephant grass genotypes, the lignified cells and vascular bundles of the stems had higher variation than the leaves. Tall-sized genotypes displayed more lignified tissues in stems than the dwarfs. The transversal area occupied by vascular bundles and lignified cells were higher in Elephant B (44 911 μm2 and 35 895 μm2) (p < 0.05), compared to the dwarfs. Forage IVDMD was higher in leaves (699 g kg−1 of dry matter [DM]) than in the stems (678 g kg−1 of DM), considering all genotypes (p < 0.05). We did not observe any direct influence of genotype on forage digestibility, despite some differences in the histological arrangements.
期刊介绍:
The African Journal of Range & Forage Science is the leading rangeland and pastoral journal in Africa. The Journal is dedicated to publishing quality original material that advances rangeland ecology and pasture management. The journal aims to publish research of international importance from any region, but as an African journal, we are particularly interested in research from Africa and relevant to the continent. The Journal promotes both science and its application and authors are encouraged to explicitly identify the practical implications of their work. Peer-reviewed research papers and research notes deal primarily with all aspects of rangeland and pasture ecology and management, including the ecophysiology and biogeochemistry of rangelands and pastures, terrestrial plant–herbivore interactions (both domestic and wild), rangeland assessment and monitoring, effects of climate change on rangelands, rangeland and pasture management, rangeland rehabilitation, ecosystem services in support of production, conservation and biodiversity goals, and the identification and development of intensive and semi-intensive pasture and forage resources to meet livestock production needs. Articles highlighting transdisciplinary linkages among biophysical and social sciences that support management, policy and societal values are particularly encouraged. The Journal includes relevant book reviews and invited perspectives that contribute to the development of range and forage science. Letters to the editor that debate issues raised in the Journal are acceptable. The African Journal of Range & Forage Science is the official journal of the Grassland Society of Southern Africa.