Histological arrangements of plant tissue of different elephant grasses as influenced by their genotypes

IF 1.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY African Journal of Range & Forage Science Pub Date : 2022-11-11 DOI:10.2989/10220119.2022.2135592
Thaíse Virgínia Freire Ramos Peixoto, Alexandre Carneiro Leão de Mello, Mércia Virginia Ferreira dos Santos, Márcio Vieira da Cunha, Rejane Magalhães de Mendonça Pimentel, Luiz Henrique Gonçalves da Silva, Djalma Euzébio Simões Filho, Janerson José Coelho
{"title":"Histological arrangements of plant tissue of different elephant grasses as influenced by their genotypes","authors":"Thaíse Virgínia Freire Ramos Peixoto, Alexandre Carneiro Leão de Mello, Mércia Virginia Ferreira dos Santos, Márcio Vieira da Cunha, Rejane Magalhães de Mendonça Pimentel, Luiz Henrique Gonçalves da Silva, Djalma Euzébio Simões Filho, Janerson José Coelho","doi":"10.2989/10220119.2022.2135592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Elephant grass genotypes display a variety of morphological differences, influencing the nutritive value of the forage. This study evaluated the histological arrangements of the leaves and stems of different elephant-grass genotypes, two tall-sized (Elephant B and IRI-381) and two dwarfs (Mott and Taiwan A-146 2.37), during a two-year trial. The grasses were harvested at 60-day intervals for two years. Biometric analyses of the stems and leaves were performed based on histological measurements. An <i>in vitro</i> dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) assay of the forage was performed. Among the elephant grass genotypes, the lignified cells and vascular bundles of the stems had higher variation than the leaves. Tall-sized genotypes displayed more lignified tissues in stems than the dwarfs. The transversal area occupied by vascular bundles and lignified cells were higher in Elephant B (44 911 μm<sup>2</sup> and 35 895 μm<sup>2</sup>) (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), compared to the dwarfs. Forage IVDMD was higher in leaves (699 g kg<sup>−1</sup> of dry matter [DM]) than in the stems (678 g kg<sup>−1</sup> of DM), considering all genotypes (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). We did not observe any direct influence of genotype on forage digestibility, despite some differences in the histological arrangements.</p>","PeriodicalId":50841,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Range & Forage Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Range & Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2989/10220119.2022.2135592","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Elephant grass genotypes display a variety of morphological differences, influencing the nutritive value of the forage. This study evaluated the histological arrangements of the leaves and stems of different elephant-grass genotypes, two tall-sized (Elephant B and IRI-381) and two dwarfs (Mott and Taiwan A-146 2.37), during a two-year trial. The grasses were harvested at 60-day intervals for two years. Biometric analyses of the stems and leaves were performed based on histological measurements. An in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) assay of the forage was performed. Among the elephant grass genotypes, the lignified cells and vascular bundles of the stems had higher variation than the leaves. Tall-sized genotypes displayed more lignified tissues in stems than the dwarfs. The transversal area occupied by vascular bundles and lignified cells were higher in Elephant B (44 911 μm2 and 35 895 μm2) (p < 0.05), compared to the dwarfs. Forage IVDMD was higher in leaves (699 g kg−1 of dry matter [DM]) than in the stems (678 g kg−1 of DM), considering all genotypes (p < 0.05). We did not observe any direct influence of genotype on forage digestibility, despite some differences in the histological arrangements.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同象草基因型对植物组织组织结构的影响
象草基因型表现出多种形态差异,影响了象草的营养价值。本研究在为期两年的试验中,评估了不同基因型象草的叶和茎的组织结构,包括两个高体型(Elephant B和IRI-381)和两个矮体型(Mott和Taiwan a -146 2.37)。这些草每隔60天收割一次,持续两年。茎和叶的生物特征分析是基于组织学测量进行的。采用体外干物质消化率(IVDMD)测定。在象草基因型中,茎部木质素化细胞和维管束的变异程度高于叶片。高基因型在茎中比矮基因型表现出更多的木质化组织。象B的维管束和木质化细胞所占的横向面积较大,分别为44 911 μm2和35 895 μm2 (p <0.05),与侏儒相比。考虑所有基因型,叶片(干物质[DM] 699 g kg−1)的饲料IVDMD高于茎(干物质[DM] 678 g kg−1)(p <0.05)。我们没有观察到基因型对饲料消化率的直接影响,尽管在组织学安排上存在一些差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
African Journal of Range & Forage Science
African Journal of Range & Forage Science ECOLOGY-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The African Journal of Range & Forage Science is the leading rangeland and pastoral journal in Africa. The Journal is dedicated to publishing quality original material that advances rangeland ecology and pasture management. The journal aims to publish research of international importance from any region, but as an African journal, we are particularly interested in research from Africa and relevant to the continent. The Journal promotes both science and its application and authors are encouraged to explicitly identify the practical implications of their work. Peer-reviewed research papers and research notes deal primarily with all aspects of rangeland and pasture ecology and management, including the ecophysiology and biogeochemistry of rangelands and pastures, terrestrial plant–herbivore interactions (both domestic and wild), rangeland assessment and monitoring, effects of climate change on rangelands, rangeland and pasture management, rangeland rehabilitation, ecosystem services in support of production, conservation and biodiversity goals, and the identification and development of intensive and semi-intensive pasture and forage resources to meet livestock production needs. Articles highlighting transdisciplinary linkages among biophysical and social sciences that support management, policy and societal values are particularly encouraged. The Journal includes relevant book reviews and invited perspectives that contribute to the development of range and forage science. Letters to the editor that debate issues raised in the Journal are acceptable. The African Journal of Range & Forage Science is the official journal of the Grassland Society of Southern Africa.
期刊最新文献
Estimation of standing crop biomass in rangelands of the Middle Atlas mountains using remote sensing data Assessment of the impact of woody species encroachment on plant species diversity and the livelihood of pastoralists in southeastern Ethiopia Book Review. Contested Karoo: Interdisciplinary perspectives on change and continuity in South Africa’s drylands From forage to multifunctionality: shifting perceptions of rangeland ecosystem services in the journals of the Grassland Society of Southern Africa The impact of sheep grazing on shrub communities at the Afrikaner and Hereford grazing trials at Grootfontein in the Eastern Upper Karoo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1