Relationships between design problem agglomerations and concerns having types and domains of software as transverse dimensions

Luis Paulo da S. Carvalho, Renato L. Novais, Manoel Mendonça
{"title":"Relationships between design problem agglomerations and concerns having types and domains of software as transverse dimensions","authors":"Luis Paulo da S. Carvalho, Renato L. Novais, Manoel Mendonça","doi":"10.1186/s13173-020-00099-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context Design problems have been recognized as one of the main causes behind the loss of software systems’ quality. Agglomerated design problems impact the quality even more. So, organizing and analyzing the relationship between design problems and concerns as agglomerations is a possible way to enhance the identification of defective source code artifacts. Problem As different systems evolve in varied manners, it is important to analyze if the evolution of agglomerated design problems can reveal cases of discrepancies and inconstancies through time. We call these cases non-uniformity of agglomerations, and they can prevent the use of agglomerations in approaches to mitigate design problems (e.g., prediction models). To the best of our knowledge, we consider that this problem has not been investigated yet. Goal This study aims to comprehend the degree to which the non-uniformity of agglomerations is either the most common or the most exceptional situation during the evolution of software projects. We perform this investigation by grouping software projects under two transverse dimensions: types and domains of software. Method To this end, we performed a two-phase investigation: in phase I, we analyzed the historical data obtained from fifteen software projects split as three groups of types of software (distributed, service-oriented, and mobile projects); in phase II, we analyzed the evolution of six projects grouped as two domains of software (graph and timeseries databases). For each phase, we (i) mined instances of a design problem (code complexity) and concerns from the source code of projects, (ii) agglomerated the instances of code complexity around the concerns and analyzed them according to the grouped projects, and (iii) examined the resulting dataset with the help of visualizations and a statistical analysis. Results/Discussion Types of software actually shows a tendency to reveal cases of non-uniformity. On the other hand, domains of software show a partial advantage regarding the production of more uniform agglomerations through evolution.","PeriodicalId":39760,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13173-020-00099-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context Design problems have been recognized as one of the main causes behind the loss of software systems’ quality. Agglomerated design problems impact the quality even more. So, organizing and analyzing the relationship between design problems and concerns as agglomerations is a possible way to enhance the identification of defective source code artifacts. Problem As different systems evolve in varied manners, it is important to analyze if the evolution of agglomerated design problems can reveal cases of discrepancies and inconstancies through time. We call these cases non-uniformity of agglomerations, and they can prevent the use of agglomerations in approaches to mitigate design problems (e.g., prediction models). To the best of our knowledge, we consider that this problem has not been investigated yet. Goal This study aims to comprehend the degree to which the non-uniformity of agglomerations is either the most common or the most exceptional situation during the evolution of software projects. We perform this investigation by grouping software projects under two transverse dimensions: types and domains of software. Method To this end, we performed a two-phase investigation: in phase I, we analyzed the historical data obtained from fifteen software projects split as three groups of types of software (distributed, service-oriented, and mobile projects); in phase II, we analyzed the evolution of six projects grouped as two domains of software (graph and timeseries databases). For each phase, we (i) mined instances of a design problem (code complexity) and concerns from the source code of projects, (ii) agglomerated the instances of code complexity around the concerns and analyzed them according to the grouped projects, and (iii) examined the resulting dataset with the help of visualizations and a statistical analysis. Results/Discussion Types of software actually shows a tendency to reveal cases of non-uniformity. On the other hand, domains of software show a partial advantage regarding the production of more uniform agglomerations through evolution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
设计问题集合体与以软件类型和领域为横向维度的关注点之间的关系
上下文设计问题已被认为是导致软件系统质量下降的主要原因之一。集中的设计问题对质量的影响更大。因此,将设计问题和关注点之间的关系组织和分析为集合是一种可能的方法,可以增强对有缺陷的源代码工件的识别。由于不同的系统以不同的方式进化,分析聚合设计问题的进化是否可以揭示随时间变化的差异和不一致的情况非常重要。我们称这些情况为聚集的非均匀性,它们可以阻止在减轻设计问题(例如,预测模型)的方法中使用聚集。据我们所知,我们认为这个问题还没有得到调查。本研究旨在理解在软件项目的发展过程中,集群的非一致性是最常见的还是最例外的情况。我们通过将软件项目分组到两个横向维度:软件的类型和领域来进行这项调查。为此,我们进行了两个阶段的调查:在第一阶段,我们分析了从15个软件项目中获得的历史数据,这些项目分为三组软件类型(分布式、面向服务和移动项目);在第二阶段,我们分析了分为两个软件领域(图数据库和时间序列数据库)的六个项目的演变。对于每个阶段,我们(i)从项目的源代码中挖掘设计问题(代码复杂性)和关注点的实例,(ii)围绕关注点聚集代码复杂性实例并根据分组项目对其进行分析,以及(iii)在可视化和统计分析的帮助下检查结果数据集。结果/讨论软件类型实际上显示出一种揭示不均匀性的趋势。另一方面,软件领域在通过进化产生更统一的聚集方面显示出部分优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society
Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society Computer Science-Computer Science (all)
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: JBCS is a formal quarterly publication of the Brazilian Computer Society. It is a peer-reviewed international journal which aims to serve as a forum to disseminate innovative research in all fields of computer science and related subjects. Theoretical, practical and experimental papers reporting original research contributions are welcome, as well as high quality survey papers. The journal is open to contributions in all computer science topics, computer systems development or in formal and theoretical aspects of computing, as the list of topics below is not exhaustive. Contributions will be considered for publication in JBCS if they have not been published previously and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
An optimization-based framework for personal scheduling during pandemic events Multiobjective message scheduling for Hybrid Synchronization in Distributed Simulations Promoting Children's Participation in a Participatory Design Process in a Rural School: A new role needed? A Deep Learning Model for the Assessment of the Visual Aesthetics of Mobile User Interfaces Adopting Human-data Interaction Guidelines and Participatory Practices for Supporting Inexperienced Designers in Information Visualization Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1