Comparative analysis of behavioural repertoires for Mahogany glider and Brushtail possum using accelerometer loggers and machine learning algorithms

IF 1.9 3区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY Journal of Zoology Pub Date : 2023-11-28 DOI:10.1111/jzo.13125
J. R. Annett, J. L. Gaschk, C. J. Clemente
{"title":"Comparative analysis of behavioural repertoires for Mahogany glider and Brushtail possum using accelerometer loggers and machine learning algorithms","authors":"J. R. Annett,&nbsp;J. L. Gaschk,&nbsp;C. J. Clemente","doi":"10.1111/jzo.13125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Gliding has evolved independently as an isolated adaptive event within many vertebrate taxa. Yet, the underlying selection forces that led to these innovative adaptations remain ambiguous, especially in species that preclude direct observation. Our study utilized accelerometry and machine learning algorithms to compare the behavioural repertoires of two sympatric species, the Mahogany glider (<i>Petaurus gracilis</i>) and brushtail possum (<i>Trichosaurus vulpecula</i>), as to explore previously proposed selection pressures such as energy expenditure (VeBA), canopy use and ground avoidance measured by activity budgets. We found that mahogany gliders on average expend more activity-related energy than brushtail possums but at different stages throughout the day. Canopy use was observed to be greater amongst mahogany gliders than brushtail possums, and we observed frequent ground use in brushtail possums yet none in mahogany gliders. The study found strong evidence to support ground avoidance as a potential driver for gliding evolution. The implications of these findings are important when considering the lack of knowledge surrounding evolved gliding behaviours in marsupials. Furthermore, the use of accelerometers and machine learning algorithms in behavioural studies has proven to be a robust and informative method and should be incorporated into future studies to understand the evolution of gliding behaviour.</p>","PeriodicalId":17600,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zoology","volume":"322 1","pages":"24-34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jzo.13125","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jzo.13125","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gliding has evolved independently as an isolated adaptive event within many vertebrate taxa. Yet, the underlying selection forces that led to these innovative adaptations remain ambiguous, especially in species that preclude direct observation. Our study utilized accelerometry and machine learning algorithms to compare the behavioural repertoires of two sympatric species, the Mahogany glider (Petaurus gracilis) and brushtail possum (Trichosaurus vulpecula), as to explore previously proposed selection pressures such as energy expenditure (VeBA), canopy use and ground avoidance measured by activity budgets. We found that mahogany gliders on average expend more activity-related energy than brushtail possums but at different stages throughout the day. Canopy use was observed to be greater amongst mahogany gliders than brushtail possums, and we observed frequent ground use in brushtail possums yet none in mahogany gliders. The study found strong evidence to support ground avoidance as a potential driver for gliding evolution. The implications of these findings are important when considering the lack of knowledge surrounding evolved gliding behaviours in marsupials. Furthermore, the use of accelerometers and machine learning algorithms in behavioural studies has proven to be a robust and informative method and should be incorporated into future studies to understand the evolution of gliding behaviour.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用加速度计记录仪和机器学习算法对红木滑翔机和帚尾负鼠的行为谱进行比较分析
滑翔作为一种孤立的适应事件在许多脊椎动物分类群中独立进化。然而,导致这些创新适应的潜在选择力量仍然不明确,特别是在无法直接观察的物种中。我们的研究利用加速度计和机器学习算法来比较两种同域物种——红木滑伞(Petaurus gracilis)和刷尾负鼠(Trichosaurus vulpecula)的行为特征,以探索之前提出的选择压力,如能量消耗(VeBA)、树冠使用和地面回避(通过活动预算测量)。我们发现,红木滑翔机平均比帚尾负鼠消耗更多的活动相关能量,但在一天中的不同阶段。在红木滑翔机中,冠层的使用被观察到比刷尾负鼠更大,我们观察到刷尾负鼠频繁使用地面,而红木滑翔机则没有。这项研究发现了强有力的证据,证明躲避地面是滑翔进化的潜在驱动力。考虑到对有袋动物进化的滑翔行为缺乏了解,这些发现的意义是重要的。此外,在行为研究中使用加速度计和机器学习算法已被证明是一种强大且信息丰富的方法,应该纳入未来的研究中,以了解滑翔行为的演变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Zoology
Journal of Zoology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Zoology publishes high-quality research papers that are original and are of broad interest. The Editors seek studies that are hypothesis-driven and interdisciplinary in nature. Papers on animal behaviour, ecology, physiology, anatomy, developmental biology, evolution, systematics, genetics and genomics will be considered; research that explores the interface between these disciplines is strongly encouraged. Studies dealing with geographically and/or taxonomically restricted topics should test general hypotheses, describe novel findings or have broad implications. The Journal of Zoology aims to maintain an effective but fair peer-review process that recognises research quality as a combination of the relevance, approach and execution of a research study.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Mammal coloration as a social signal—the debate is still open: a comment on Howell and Caro (2024) Further thoughts on comparative analyses of coloration Night life: Positional behaviors and activity patterns of the Neotropical kinkajou, Potos flavus (Carnivora, Procyonidae)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1