Equivalent analytical models for assessment of landfill composite liners

IF 2.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Geosynthetics International Pub Date : 2023-11-21 DOI:10.1680/jgein.23.00117
H. Xie, W. Xu, L. Wang, H. Yan, J. Wu
{"title":"Equivalent analytical models for assessment of landfill composite liners","authors":"H. Xie, W. Xu, L. Wang, H. Yan, J. Wu","doi":"10.1680/jgein.23.00117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to efficiently estimate the properties of landfill composite liners, equivalent analytical models based on time moment are proposed. The service performance of geomembrane layer (GMBL)/geosynthetic clay layer (GCL)/attenuation layer (AL) and GMBL/compacted clay layer (CCL)/AL are equivalent analyzed. The equivalent analysis and quantitative correlation of contaminants at the bottom of GMBL/GCL/AL and GMBL/CCL/AL are considered according to relative concentration (<i>C<sub>N</sub></i>), instantaneous flux (<i>J<sub>I</sub></i>) and accumulative flux (<i>J<sub>A</sub></i>). We showed that <i>C<sub>N</sub></i> is the most conservative equivalent index. The thickness equivalent relation of AL for different composite liners is consequently obtained using the pure diffusion equivalent model and the advection-diffusion equivalent model, respectively. It is found that the pure diffusion thickness equivalent relationship was a simplified linear correlation and time independent. The quadratic polynomial equivalent equations of AL thickness for different service time are obtained by group method of data handling approach (GMDH). The results show that GCL composite liner has better environmental protection performance than CCL composite liner. When the thickness of GMBL/CCL/AL composite liner is fixed, the corresponding equivalent thickness of AL in GMBL/GCL/AL composite liner decreased with the rise of leachate head and wrinkle length for the same value of <i>C<sub>N</sub></i>.","PeriodicalId":12616,"journal":{"name":"Geosynthetics International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geosynthetics International","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.23.00117","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to efficiently estimate the properties of landfill composite liners, equivalent analytical models based on time moment are proposed. The service performance of geomembrane layer (GMBL)/geosynthetic clay layer (GCL)/attenuation layer (AL) and GMBL/compacted clay layer (CCL)/AL are equivalent analyzed. The equivalent analysis and quantitative correlation of contaminants at the bottom of GMBL/GCL/AL and GMBL/CCL/AL are considered according to relative concentration (CN), instantaneous flux (JI) and accumulative flux (JA). We showed that CN is the most conservative equivalent index. The thickness equivalent relation of AL for different composite liners is consequently obtained using the pure diffusion equivalent model and the advection-diffusion equivalent model, respectively. It is found that the pure diffusion thickness equivalent relationship was a simplified linear correlation and time independent. The quadratic polynomial equivalent equations of AL thickness for different service time are obtained by group method of data handling approach (GMDH). The results show that GCL composite liner has better environmental protection performance than CCL composite liner. When the thickness of GMBL/CCL/AL composite liner is fixed, the corresponding equivalent thickness of AL in GMBL/GCL/AL composite liner decreased with the rise of leachate head and wrinkle length for the same value of CN.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
垃圾填埋场复合衬垫的等效分析模型
为了有效地估计垃圾填埋场复合衬垫的性能,提出了基于时间矩的等效分析模型。对土工膜层(GMBL)/土工合成粘土层(GCL)/衰减层(AL)和GMBL/密实粘土层(CCL)/AL的使用性能进行等效分析。根据相对浓度(CN)、瞬时通量(JI)和累积通量(JA)考虑GMBL/GCL/AL和GMBL/CCL/AL底部污染物的等效分析和定量关联。我们证明了CN是最保守的等效指数。利用纯扩散等效模型和平流-扩散等效模型,分别得到了不同复合衬垫AL的厚度等效关系。发现纯扩散厚度等效关系是一种简化的线性相关关系,与时间无关。采用分组数据处理方法(GMDH),得到了不同服役时间下铝壁厚度的二次多项式等效方程。结果表明,GCL复合衬垫比CCL复合衬垫具有更好的环保性能。当GMBL/CCL/AL复合衬里厚度一定时,在CN值相同的情况下,GMBL/GCL/AL复合衬里对应的AL等效厚度随着渗滤液水头和皱折长度的增大而减小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geosynthetics International
Geosynthetics International ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: An online only, rapid publication journal, Geosynthetics International – an official journal of the International Geosynthetics Society (IGS) – publishes the best information on current geosynthetics technology in research, design innovation, new materials and construction practice. Topics covered The whole of geosynthetic materials (including natural fibre products) such as research, behaviour, performance analysis, testing, design, construction methods, case histories and field experience. Geosynthetics International is received by all members of the IGS as part of their membership, and is published in e-only format six times a year.
期刊最新文献
Geosynthetic MSE walls research and practice: past, present, and future (2023 IGS Bathurst Lecture) Investigation of the mechanical response of recovered geogrids under repeated loading Factors affecting the tensile strength of bituminous geomembrane seams Centrifuge modeling of levees with geocomposite chimney drain subjected to flooding Selection of long-term shear strength parameters for strain softening geosynthetic interfaces (2023 IGS Rowe Lecture)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1