An Update of Tarski: Two Usages of the Word “True”

IF 0.7 3区 数学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Journal of Logic Language and Information Pub Date : 2022-04-06 DOI:10.1007/s10849-022-09360-3
Zhen Zhao
{"title":"An Update of Tarski: Two Usages of the Word “True”","authors":"Zhen Zhao","doi":"10.1007/s10849-022-09360-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper is based on Tarski’s theory of truth. The purpose of this paper is to solve the liar paradox (and its cousins) and keep both of the deductive power of classical logic and the expressive power of the word “true” in natural language. The key of this paper lies in the distinction between the predicate usage and the operator usage of the word “true”. The truth operator is primarily used for characterizing the semantics of the language. Then, we do not need the hierarchy of languages. The truth predicate is mainly used for grammatical function. Tarski’s schema of the truth predicate is not necessary in this proposal. The schema of the word \"true\" is the schema of the truth operator. The liar paradox (and its cousins) can be solved in this way. In the appendix, I show a consistent model for both of the truth predicate and the truth operator.\n</p>","PeriodicalId":48732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Logic Language and Information","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Logic Language and Information","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-022-09360-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is based on Tarski’s theory of truth. The purpose of this paper is to solve the liar paradox (and its cousins) and keep both of the deductive power of classical logic and the expressive power of the word “true” in natural language. The key of this paper lies in the distinction between the predicate usage and the operator usage of the word “true”. The truth operator is primarily used for characterizing the semantics of the language. Then, we do not need the hierarchy of languages. The truth predicate is mainly used for grammatical function. Tarski’s schema of the truth predicate is not necessary in this proposal. The schema of the word "true" is the schema of the truth operator. The liar paradox (and its cousins) can be solved in this way. In the appendix, I show a consistent model for both of the truth predicate and the truth operator.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
塔斯基的更新:“真”字的两种用法
本文以塔斯基的真理理论为基础。本文的目的是解决说谎者悖论(及其同类悖论),同时保留经典逻辑的演绎能力和自然语言中“真”一词的表达能力。本文的重点在于“真”一词的谓词用法和操作符用法的区别。真值运算符主要用于描述语言的语义。那么,我们就不需要语言的层次结构了。真值谓词主要用于语法功能。塔斯基的真谓词图式在这个命题中是不必要的。单词“true”的模式是真值运算符的模式。说谎者悖论(及其同类悖论)可以用这种方式解决。在附录中,我展示了真值谓词和真值运算符的一致模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Logic Language and Information
Journal of Logic Language and Information COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCEL-LOGIC
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The scope of the journal is the logical and computational foundations of natural, formal, and programming languages, as well as the different forms of human and mechanized inference. It covers the logical, linguistic, and information-theoretic parts of the cognitive sciences. Examples of main subareas are Intentional Logics including Dynamic Logic; Nonmonotonic Logic and Belief Revision; Constructive Logics; Complexity Issues in Logic and Linguistics; Theoretical Problems of Logic Programming and Resolution; Categorial Grammar and Type Theory; Generalized Quantification; Information-Oriented Theories of Semantic Structure like Situation Semantics, Discourse Representation Theory, and Dynamic Semantics; Connectionist Models of Logical and Linguistic Structures. The emphasis is on the theoretical aspects of these areas.
期刊最新文献
Why Sometimes the King of France is Not Bald: Presupposition Denial Without Ambiguity Logical Models of Mathematical Texts: The Case of Conventions for Division by Zero Propositional Logic for Infinitive Sentences Syllogistic Relevance and Term Logic Algebraic Completeness of Connexive and Bi-Intuitionistic Multilattice Logics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1