The transition to new ozone absorption cross-sections for Dobson and Brewer total ozone measurements

IF 3.2 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Pub Date : 2023-11-24 DOI:10.5194/amt-2023-220
Karl Voglmeier, Voltaire Velazco, Luca Egli, Julian Gröbner, Alberto Redondas, Wolfgang Steinbrecht
{"title":"The transition to new ozone absorption cross-sections for Dobson and Brewer total ozone measurements","authors":"Karl Voglmeier, Voltaire Velazco, Luca Egli, Julian Gröbner, Alberto Redondas, Wolfgang Steinbrecht","doi":"10.5194/amt-2023-220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Abstract.</strong> Comparison of total ozone column (TOC) measurements from ground-based Dobson and Brewer spectrophotometers and from various satellite instruments generally reveals seasonally varying differences of a few percent. A large part of these differences has been attributed to the operationally used Bass &amp; Paur ozone cross-sections and the lack of accounting for varying stratospheric temperatures in the standard total ozone retrieval for Dobson. This paper demonstrates how the use of new ozone absorption cross sections from the University of Bremen (Weber et al., 2016), as recommended by the committee on Absorption Cross-Sections of Ozone, the application of appropriate slit functions, especially for the Dobson instrument (Bernhard et al. 2005), and the use of climatological values for the effective ozone layer temperature (T<sub>eff</sub>), e.g. from TEMIS, essentially eliminate these seasonally varying differences between Dobson and Brewer total ozone data. Applying this approach to the existing global network of Dobson spectrometers will reduce the uncertainty of their total ozone data, from previously 3 to 4 % to better than 2.0 % at most locations.","PeriodicalId":8619,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Measurement Techniques","volume":"176 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Measurement Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-220","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Comparison of total ozone column (TOC) measurements from ground-based Dobson and Brewer spectrophotometers and from various satellite instruments generally reveals seasonally varying differences of a few percent. A large part of these differences has been attributed to the operationally used Bass & Paur ozone cross-sections and the lack of accounting for varying stratospheric temperatures in the standard total ozone retrieval for Dobson. This paper demonstrates how the use of new ozone absorption cross sections from the University of Bremen (Weber et al., 2016), as recommended by the committee on Absorption Cross-Sections of Ozone, the application of appropriate slit functions, especially for the Dobson instrument (Bernhard et al. 2005), and the use of climatological values for the effective ozone layer temperature (Teff), e.g. from TEMIS, essentially eliminate these seasonally varying differences between Dobson and Brewer total ozone data. Applying this approach to the existing global network of Dobson spectrometers will reduce the uncertainty of their total ozone data, from previously 3 to 4 % to better than 2.0 % at most locations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
过渡到新的臭氧吸收截面的Dobson和Brewer总臭氧测量
摘要。将地面多布森和布鲁尔分光光度计和各种卫星仪器测量的总臭氧柱(TOC)进行比较,通常会显示出几个百分点的季节性差异。这些差异的很大一部分归因于操作上使用的Bass &在Dobson的标准总臭氧检索中,臭氧横截面和缺乏对平流层温度变化的考虑。本文演示了如何根据臭氧吸收截面委员会的建议,使用不来梅大学的新臭氧吸收截面(Weber et al., 2016),适当的狭缝函数的应用,特别是对于Dobson仪器(Bernhard et al. 2005),以及使用有效臭氧层温度(Teff)的气候学值,例如来自TEMIS,基本上消除了多布森和布鲁尔臭氧总量数据之间的季节性差异。将这种方法应用到现有的全球多布森光谱仪网络中,将减少它们的总臭氧数据的不确定性,从以前的3%到4%降低到大多数地点的2.0%以上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
18.40%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT) is an international scientific journal dedicated to the publication and discussion of advances in remote sensing, in-situ and laboratory measurement techniques for the constituents and properties of the Earth’s atmosphere. The main subject areas comprise the development, intercomparison and validation of measurement instruments and techniques of data processing and information retrieval for gases, aerosols, and clouds. The manuscript types considered for peer-reviewed publication are research articles, review articles, and commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Analyzing the chemical composition, morphology and size of ice-nucleating particles by coupling a scanning electron microscope to an offline diffusion chamber Wet-Radome Attenuation in ARM Cloud Radars and Its Utilization in Radar Calibration Using Disdrometer Measurements Chilean Observation Network De MeteOr Radars (CONDOR): Multi-Static System Configuration & Wind Comparison with Co-located Lidar Benchmarking KDP in Rainfall: A Quantitative Assessment of Estimation Algorithms Using C-Band Weather Radar Observations Advances in OH reactivity instruments for airborne field measurements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1