Was Judah he-Ḥasid the “Author” of Sefer Ḥasidim ?

IF 0.2 2区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY Jewish History Pub Date : 2021-04-09 DOI:10.1007/s10835-021-09374-7
David I. Shyovitz
{"title":"Was Judah he-Ḥasid the “Author” of Sefer Ḥasidim ?","authors":"David I. Shyovitz","doi":"10.1007/s10835-021-09374-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Sefer</i> <i>Ḥasidim</i> (The Book of the Pious) has long served as a crucial source for medieval Jewish historiography. Yet the dual question of who composed the anonymous text and how its varying recensions came into existence has been a contentious one among scholars of medieval Ashkenaz. In particular, opinions have been split on the issue of the book’s authorship. Ever since the 1538 publication of the <i>editio princeps</i>, Judah he-Ḥasid (“the Pious,” d. 1217) has been credited as the work’s singular “author,” but in the intervening years numerous theories of composite authorship have been proposed as well. The present article reassesses notions of “authorship” in medieval Ashkenaz and does so in dialogue with Ivan Marcus’s recent <i>Sefer Ḥasidim and the Ashkenazic Book in Medieval Europe</i> (2018), a work that seeks to deconstruct the reductive category of unitary “books” in medieval Ashkenaz, but which simultaneously reifies Judah’s self-conscious “authorial identity.” In contrast, I argue on methodological and conceptual grounds that “authorship” is a problematic category in medieval Ashkenazic culture and suggest that in the case of <i>Sefer Ḥasidim</i> there are textual reasons to doubt that a single individual (Judah he-Ḥasid or anyone else) was solely responsible for “authoring” the text in its entirety.</p>","PeriodicalId":44151,"journal":{"name":"Jewish History","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jewish History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10835-021-09374-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sefer Ḥasidim (The Book of the Pious) has long served as a crucial source for medieval Jewish historiography. Yet the dual question of who composed the anonymous text and how its varying recensions came into existence has been a contentious one among scholars of medieval Ashkenaz. In particular, opinions have been split on the issue of the book’s authorship. Ever since the 1538 publication of the editio princeps, Judah he-Ḥasid (“the Pious,” d. 1217) has been credited as the work’s singular “author,” but in the intervening years numerous theories of composite authorship have been proposed as well. The present article reassesses notions of “authorship” in medieval Ashkenaz and does so in dialogue with Ivan Marcus’s recent Sefer Ḥasidim and the Ashkenazic Book in Medieval Europe (2018), a work that seeks to deconstruct the reductive category of unitary “books” in medieval Ashkenaz, but which simultaneously reifies Judah’s self-conscious “authorial identity.” In contrast, I argue on methodological and conceptual grounds that “authorship” is a problematic category in medieval Ashkenazic culture and suggest that in the case of Sefer Ḥasidim there are textual reasons to doubt that a single individual (Judah he-Ḥasid or anyone else) was solely responsible for “authoring” the text in its entirety.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
犹大是-Ḥasid西弗的“作者”Ḥasidim吗?
Sefer Ḥasidim (The Book of The Pious)长期以来一直是中世纪犹太史学的重要来源。然而,谁撰写了这份匿名文本,以及它的不同版本是如何形成的这两个问题,一直是中世纪德系犹太人学者之间争论不休的问题。特别是在该书作者的问题上,意见出现了分歧。自从1538年《圣经》出版以来,犹大-Ḥasid(“虔诚者”,1217年)一直被认为是这部作品的唯一“作者”,但在这期间,也有人提出了许多复合作者的理论。本文重新评估了中世纪阿什肯纳兹“作者”的概念,并与伊万·马库斯最近的《塞弗Ḥasidim》和《中世纪欧洲的阿什肯纳兹书》(2018)进行了对话,这部作品试图解构中世纪阿什肯纳兹单一“书”的简化类别,但同时也具体化了犹大的自我意识“作者身份”。相反,我从方法论和概念上认为,在中世纪的德系犹太人文化中,“作者身份”是一个有问题的类别,并建议在Sefer Ḥasidim的情况下,有文本上的理由怀疑单个个体(Judah he-Ḥasid或其他任何人)是否完全负责“创作”整个文本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jewish History
Jewish History HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: The purpose of Jewish History, the sole English-language publication devoted exclusively to history and the Jews, is to broaden the limits of historical writing on the Jews. Jewish History publishes contributions in the field of history, but also in the ancillary fields of art, literature, sociology, and anthropology, where these fields and history proper cross paths. The diverse personal and professional backgrounds of Jewish History''s contributors, a truly international meeting of minds, have enriched the journal and offered readers innovative essays as well as special issues on topics proposed by guest editors: women and Jewish inheritance, the Jews of Latin America, and Jewish self-imaging, to name but a few in a long list.
期刊最新文献
Reconsidering Early Modern Jewry: Reflections on the Methodology of Legal History Rav Hai Gaon’s Jurisprudential Monograph Kitāb Adab al-Qaḍā: A Reconstructed Text from the Cairo Genizah Where to Turn? How One Italian Rabbi Understood Ashkenaz, ca. 1600 A Hebrew Fragment in the Municipal Archive in Münster as a Witness to a Little-Known Ritual Practice A Jew in the Roman Bathhouse: Cultural Interaction in the Ancient Mediterranean. By Yaron Z. Eliav.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1