Forecasting the carsharing service demand using uni and multivariable models

IF 2.4 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Journal of Internet Services and Applications Pub Date : 2021-08-04 DOI:10.1186/s13174-021-00137-8
Alencar, Victor Aquiles, Pessamilio, Lucas Ribeiro, Rooke, Felipe, Bernardino, Heder Soares, Borges Vieira, Alex
{"title":"Forecasting the carsharing service demand using uni and multivariable models","authors":"Alencar, Victor Aquiles, Pessamilio, Lucas Ribeiro, Rooke, Felipe, Bernardino, Heder Soares, Borges Vieira, Alex","doi":"10.1186/s13174-021-00137-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Carsharing is ana lternative to urban mobility that has been widely adopted recently. This service presents three main business models: two of these models base their services on stations while the remainder, the free-floating service, is free of fixed stations. Despite the notable advantages of carsharing, this service is prone to several problems, such as fleet imbalance due to the variance of the daily demand in large urban centers. Forecasting the demand for the service is a key task to deal with this issue. In this sense, in this work, we analyze the use of well-known techniques to forecast a carsharing service demand. More in deep, we evaluate the use of the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Prophet techniques to predict the demand of three real carsharing services. Moreover, we also evaluate seven state-of-the-art forecasting models on a given free-floating carsharing service, highlighting the potentials of each technique. In addition to historical carsharing service data, we have also used climatic series to enhance the forecasting. Indeed, the results of our analysis have shown that the addition of meteorological data improved the models’ performance. In this case, the mean absolute error of LSTM may fall by half, when using the climate data. When considering the free-floating carsharing service, and prediction for the short-term (i.e., 12 hours), the boosting algorithms (e.g. XGBoost, Catboost, and LightGBM) present superior performance, with less than 20% of mean absolute error when compared to the next best-ranked model (Prophet). On the other hand, Prophet performed better for predictions conducted on long-term periods.","PeriodicalId":46467,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Internet Services and Applications","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Internet Services and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13174-021-00137-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Carsharing is ana lternative to urban mobility that has been widely adopted recently. This service presents three main business models: two of these models base their services on stations while the remainder, the free-floating service, is free of fixed stations. Despite the notable advantages of carsharing, this service is prone to several problems, such as fleet imbalance due to the variance of the daily demand in large urban centers. Forecasting the demand for the service is a key task to deal with this issue. In this sense, in this work, we analyze the use of well-known techniques to forecast a carsharing service demand. More in deep, we evaluate the use of the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Prophet techniques to predict the demand of three real carsharing services. Moreover, we also evaluate seven state-of-the-art forecasting models on a given free-floating carsharing service, highlighting the potentials of each technique. In addition to historical carsharing service data, we have also used climatic series to enhance the forecasting. Indeed, the results of our analysis have shown that the addition of meteorological data improved the models’ performance. In this case, the mean absolute error of LSTM may fall by half, when using the climate data. When considering the free-floating carsharing service, and prediction for the short-term (i.e., 12 hours), the boosting algorithms (e.g. XGBoost, Catboost, and LightGBM) present superior performance, with less than 20% of mean absolute error when compared to the next best-ranked model (Prophet). On the other hand, Prophet performed better for predictions conducted on long-term periods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于单变量和多变量模型的汽车共享服务需求预测
汽车共享是最近被广泛采用的城市交通的另一种选择。这项服务提供了三种主要的商业模式:其中两种模式的服务基于电台,而其余的自由浮动服务则没有固定电台。尽管拼车有明显的优势,但这种服务也容易出现一些问题,比如由于大城市中心的日常需求差异而导致车队不平衡。预测服务需求是解决这一问题的关键。从这个意义上说,在这项工作中,我们分析了使用众所周知的技术来预测汽车共享服务的需求。更深入地,我们评估了使用长短期记忆(LSTM)和先知技术来预测三种真实的汽车共享服务的需求。此外,我们还在给定的自由浮动汽车共享服务上评估了七个最先进的预测模型,突出了每种技术的潜力。除了历史共享汽车服务数据外,我们还使用气候序列来增强预测。事实上,我们的分析结果表明,气象数据的加入提高了模型的性能。在这种情况下,当使用气候数据时,LSTM的平均绝对误差可能会下降一半。当考虑到自由浮动的汽车共享服务,以及短期(即12小时)的预测时,增强算法(例如XGBoost, Catboost和LightGBM)表现出卓越的性能,与排名第二的模型(Prophet)相比,平均绝对误差小于20%。另一方面,先知在长期预测方面表现更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Internet Services and Applications
Journal of Internet Services and Applications COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Load Balancing between Paths using Software Defined Networks Predictive Fraud Detection: An Intelligent Method for Internet of Smart Grid Things Systems An Approach to Remote Update Embedded Systems in the Internet of Things NetOr: A Microservice Oriented Inter-Domain Vertical Service Orchestrator for 5G Networks Data Compression in LoRa Networks: A Compromise between Performance and Energy Consumption
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1