The relationship between self-talk and affective processes in sports: a scoping review

IF 6.4 2区 心理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology Pub Date : 2022-01-18 DOI:10.1080/1750984x.2021.2021543
Julian Fritsch, Katharina Feil, Darko Jekauc, Alexander T. Latinjak, Antonis Hatzigeorgiadis
{"title":"The relationship between self-talk and affective processes in sports: a scoping review","authors":"Julian Fritsch, Katharina Feil, Darko Jekauc, Alexander T. Latinjak, Antonis Hatzigeorgiadis","doi":"10.1080/1750984x.2021.2021543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>ABSTRACT</b></p><p>A perspective on self-talk introduced in the literature distinguishes between organic self-talk and strategic self-talk. Based on this perspective, the purpose of the present scoping review was to (a) give a comprehensive overview of studies investigating the relationship between organic self-talk and affective processes and (b) review the effectiveness of strategic self-talk to regulate affective processes. A systematic search was conducted with the databases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and SPORTDiscus. As a result, 44 articles with 46 relevant studies were included for an in-depth analysis. Thirty studies focused on organic self-talk and 15 on strategic self-talk, while one study focused on both. With regard to organic self-talk, the results indicate a relatively consistent concurrence of the valence of self-talk and affective processes. In addition, various functions of self-talk relate to emotion regulation. For strategic self-talk, intervention studies, which were limited to the regulation of anxiety, revealed mixed effects. Based on the results, we discuss how the integration of various established theories in sport psychology in the new self-talk perspective might facilitate a more systematic approach when studying the relationship between self-talk and affective processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47658,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology","volume":"122 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984x.2021.2021543","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT

A perspective on self-talk introduced in the literature distinguishes between organic self-talk and strategic self-talk. Based on this perspective, the purpose of the present scoping review was to (a) give a comprehensive overview of studies investigating the relationship between organic self-talk and affective processes and (b) review the effectiveness of strategic self-talk to regulate affective processes. A systematic search was conducted with the databases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and SPORTDiscus. As a result, 44 articles with 46 relevant studies were included for an in-depth analysis. Thirty studies focused on organic self-talk and 15 on strategic self-talk, while one study focused on both. With regard to organic self-talk, the results indicate a relatively consistent concurrence of the valence of self-talk and affective processes. In addition, various functions of self-talk relate to emotion regulation. For strategic self-talk, intervention studies, which were limited to the regulation of anxiety, revealed mixed effects. Based on the results, we discuss how the integration of various established theories in sport psychology in the new self-talk perspective might facilitate a more systematic approach when studying the relationship between self-talk and affective processes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体育运动中自我对话与情感过程的关系:一个范围综述
文献中引入的自我对话视角将自我对话分为有机自我对话和策略自我对话。基于这一观点,本研究的目的是(a)对有机自我对话与情感过程之间关系的研究进行全面概述,(b)回顾战略性自我对话调节情感过程的有效性。系统检索PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、PsycINFO和SPORTDiscus数据库。因此,纳入44篇文章和46项相关研究进行深入分析。30项研究关注有机自我对话,15项研究关注战略自我对话,还有一项研究关注两者。在有机自言自语方面,结果表明自言自语的效价与情感过程具有相对一致的一致性。此外,自言自语的各种功能都与情绪调节有关。对于策略性自我对话,干预研究(仅限于对焦虑的调节)显示出混合效果。在此基础上,我们讨论了在新的自我对话视角下,如何整合运动心理学中各种已建立的理论,从而在研究自我对话与情感过程之间的关系时提供更系统的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology is the first scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that publishes critical reviews of research literature in sport and exercise psychology. Typically, these reviews evaluate relevant conceptual and methodological issues in the field and provide a critique of the strengths and weaknesses of empirical studies that address common themes or hypotheses. The reviews present summaries of, and conclusions about, the current state of knowledge concerning topics of interest, as well as assessments of relevant unresolved issues and future trends. Reviews of research literature on theories, topics and issues that are at the interface with mainstream psychology are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
The role of deliberation in intuitive decision-making in sports The coach-athlete relationship within a cross-boundary team of experts: a conceptual analysis Scoping review of literature and systematic search of web-based resources: parasport classification instructions, experiences, and outcomes Performance support team effectiveness in elite sport: a narrative review Application of Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) in assessing the relationship between affect and movement behaviors among people with mood disorders: a scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1