Julian Fritsch, Katharina Feil, Darko Jekauc, Alexander T. Latinjak, Antonis Hatzigeorgiadis
{"title":"The relationship between self-talk and affective processes in sports: a scoping review","authors":"Julian Fritsch, Katharina Feil, Darko Jekauc, Alexander T. Latinjak, Antonis Hatzigeorgiadis","doi":"10.1080/1750984x.2021.2021543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>ABSTRACT</b></p><p>A perspective on self-talk introduced in the literature distinguishes between organic self-talk and strategic self-talk. Based on this perspective, the purpose of the present scoping review was to (a) give a comprehensive overview of studies investigating the relationship between organic self-talk and affective processes and (b) review the effectiveness of strategic self-talk to regulate affective processes. A systematic search was conducted with the databases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and SPORTDiscus. As a result, 44 articles with 46 relevant studies were included for an in-depth analysis. Thirty studies focused on organic self-talk and 15 on strategic self-talk, while one study focused on both. With regard to organic self-talk, the results indicate a relatively consistent concurrence of the valence of self-talk and affective processes. In addition, various functions of self-talk relate to emotion regulation. For strategic self-talk, intervention studies, which were limited to the regulation of anxiety, revealed mixed effects. Based on the results, we discuss how the integration of various established theories in sport psychology in the new self-talk perspective might facilitate a more systematic approach when studying the relationship between self-talk and affective processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47658,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology","volume":"122 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984x.2021.2021543","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT
A perspective on self-talk introduced in the literature distinguishes between organic self-talk and strategic self-talk. Based on this perspective, the purpose of the present scoping review was to (a) give a comprehensive overview of studies investigating the relationship between organic self-talk and affective processes and (b) review the effectiveness of strategic self-talk to regulate affective processes. A systematic search was conducted with the databases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and SPORTDiscus. As a result, 44 articles with 46 relevant studies were included for an in-depth analysis. Thirty studies focused on organic self-talk and 15 on strategic self-talk, while one study focused on both. With regard to organic self-talk, the results indicate a relatively consistent concurrence of the valence of self-talk and affective processes. In addition, various functions of self-talk relate to emotion regulation. For strategic self-talk, intervention studies, which were limited to the regulation of anxiety, revealed mixed effects. Based on the results, we discuss how the integration of various established theories in sport psychology in the new self-talk perspective might facilitate a more systematic approach when studying the relationship between self-talk and affective processes.
文献中引入的自我对话视角将自我对话分为有机自我对话和策略自我对话。基于这一观点,本研究的目的是(a)对有机自我对话与情感过程之间关系的研究进行全面概述,(b)回顾战略性自我对话调节情感过程的有效性。系统检索PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、PsycINFO和SPORTDiscus数据库。因此,纳入44篇文章和46项相关研究进行深入分析。30项研究关注有机自我对话,15项研究关注战略自我对话,还有一项研究关注两者。在有机自言自语方面,结果表明自言自语的效价与情感过程具有相对一致的一致性。此外,自言自语的各种功能都与情绪调节有关。对于策略性自我对话,干预研究(仅限于对焦虑的调节)显示出混合效果。在此基础上,我们讨论了在新的自我对话视角下,如何整合运动心理学中各种已建立的理论,从而在研究自我对话与情感过程之间的关系时提供更系统的方法。
期刊介绍:
International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology is the first scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that publishes critical reviews of research literature in sport and exercise psychology. Typically, these reviews evaluate relevant conceptual and methodological issues in the field and provide a critique of the strengths and weaknesses of empirical studies that address common themes or hypotheses. The reviews present summaries of, and conclusions about, the current state of knowledge concerning topics of interest, as well as assessments of relevant unresolved issues and future trends. Reviews of research literature on theories, topics and issues that are at the interface with mainstream psychology are especially welcome.