A Grid-Induced and Physics-Informed Machine Learning CFD Framework for Turbulent Flows

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q3 MECHANICS Flow, Turbulence and Combustion Pub Date : 2023-12-04 DOI:10.1007/s10494-023-00506-2
Chin Yik Lee, Stewart Cant
{"title":"A Grid-Induced and Physics-Informed Machine Learning CFD Framework for Turbulent Flows","authors":"Chin Yik Lee,&nbsp;Stewart Cant","doi":"10.1007/s10494-023-00506-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>High fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is increasingly being used to enable deeper understanding of turbulence or to aid in the design of practical engineering systems. While such CFD approaches can predict complex turbulence phenomena, the computational grid often needs to be sufficiently refined to accurately capture the flow, especially at high Reynolds number. As a result, the computational cost of the CFD can become very high. It therefore becomes impractical to adopt such simulations for parametric investigations. To mitigate this, we propose a framework where coarse grid simulations can be used to predict the fine grid results through machine learning. Coarsening the computational grid increases the grid-induced error and affects the prediction of turbulence. This requires an approach that can generate a data-driven surrogate model capable of predicting the local error distribution and correcting for the turbulence quantities. The proposed framework is tested using a turbulent bluff-body flow in an enclosed duct. We first highlight the flow field differences between the fine grid and coarse grid simulations. We then consider a set of scenarios to investigate the capability of the surrogate model to interpolate and extrapolate outside the training data range. The impact of operating conditions and grid sizes are considered. A Random Forest regression algorithm is used to construct the surrogate model. Two different sets of input features are investigated. The first only takes into account the grid-induced error and local flow properties. The second supplements the first using additional variables that serve to capture and generalise turbulence. The global and localised errors for the predictions are quantified. We show that the second set of input features is better at correcting for the biases due to insufficient resolution and spurious flow behaviour, providing more accurate and consistent predictions. The proposed method has proven to be capable of correcting the coarse-grid results and obtaining reasonable predictions for new, unseen cases. Based on the investigated cases, we found this method maximises the benefit of the available data and shows potential for a good predictive capability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":559,"journal":{"name":"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion","volume":"112 2","pages":"407 - 442"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10494-023-00506-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is increasingly being used to enable deeper understanding of turbulence or to aid in the design of practical engineering systems. While such CFD approaches can predict complex turbulence phenomena, the computational grid often needs to be sufficiently refined to accurately capture the flow, especially at high Reynolds number. As a result, the computational cost of the CFD can become very high. It therefore becomes impractical to adopt such simulations for parametric investigations. To mitigate this, we propose a framework where coarse grid simulations can be used to predict the fine grid results through machine learning. Coarsening the computational grid increases the grid-induced error and affects the prediction of turbulence. This requires an approach that can generate a data-driven surrogate model capable of predicting the local error distribution and correcting for the turbulence quantities. The proposed framework is tested using a turbulent bluff-body flow in an enclosed duct. We first highlight the flow field differences between the fine grid and coarse grid simulations. We then consider a set of scenarios to investigate the capability of the surrogate model to interpolate and extrapolate outside the training data range. The impact of operating conditions and grid sizes are considered. A Random Forest regression algorithm is used to construct the surrogate model. Two different sets of input features are investigated. The first only takes into account the grid-induced error and local flow properties. The second supplements the first using additional variables that serve to capture and generalise turbulence. The global and localised errors for the predictions are quantified. We show that the second set of input features is better at correcting for the biases due to insufficient resolution and spurious flow behaviour, providing more accurate and consistent predictions. The proposed method has proven to be capable of correcting the coarse-grid results and obtaining reasonable predictions for new, unseen cases. Based on the investigated cases, we found this method maximises the benefit of the available data and shows potential for a good predictive capability.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
紊流的网格诱导和物理信息机器学习CFD框架
高保真计算流体动力学(CFD)越来越多地被用于更深入地理解湍流或辅助实际工程系统的设计。虽然这种CFD方法可以预测复杂的湍流现象,但计算网格通常需要足够精细才能准确捕获流动,特别是在高雷诺数时。因此,CFD的计算成本会变得非常高。因此,采用这种模拟进行参数化研究是不切实际的。为了缓解这种情况,我们提出了一个框架,其中粗网格模拟可用于通过机器学习预测细网格结果。计算网格的粗化增加了网格引起的误差,影响了湍流的预测。这需要一种能够生成数据驱动的代理模型的方法,该模型能够预测局部误差分布并校正湍流量。采用封闭管道中的紊流崖体流对所提出的框架进行了测试。我们首先强调细网格和粗网格模拟的流场差异。然后,我们考虑一组场景来研究代理模型在训练数据范围之外进行内插和外推的能力。考虑了运行条件和网格大小的影响。采用随机森林回归算法构建代理模型。研究了两组不同的输入特征。第一种方法只考虑网格引起的误差和局部流动特性。第二种方法是对第一种方法的补充,使用额外的变量来捕捉和概括湍流。对预测的全局和局部误差进行了量化。我们表明,第二组输入特征可以更好地纠正由于分辨率不足和虚假流动行为造成的偏差,从而提供更准确和一致的预测。该方法已被证明能够修正粗网格结果,并对新的未知情况获得合理的预测。根据调查的案例,我们发现该方法可以最大限度地利用现有数据,并显示出良好的预测能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Flow, Turbulence and Combustion provides a global forum for the publication of original and innovative research results that contribute to the solution of fundamental and applied problems encountered in single-phase, multi-phase and reacting flows, in both idealized and real systems. The scope of coverage encompasses topics in fluid dynamics, scalar transport, multi-physics interactions and flow control. From time to time the journal publishes Special or Theme Issues featuring invited articles. Contributions may report research that falls within the broad spectrum of analytical, computational and experimental methods. This includes research conducted in academia, industry and a variety of environmental and geophysical sectors. Turbulence, transition and associated phenomena are expected to play a significant role in the majority of studies reported, although non-turbulent flows, typical of those in micro-devices, would be regarded as falling within the scope covered. The emphasis is on originality, timeliness, quality and thematic fit, as exemplified by the title of the journal and the qualifications described above. Relevance to real-world problems and industrial applications are regarded as strengths.
期刊最新文献
Numerical Simulation of Hydrodynamic Noises during Bubble Rising Process High Speed Particle Image Velocimetry in a Large Engine Prechamber The Aerodynamic Breakup and Interactions of Evaporating Water Droplets with a Propagating Shock Wave Passive Control of Shock-Wave/Turbulent Boundary-Layer Interaction Using Spanwise Heterogeneous Roughness Installation Effects on Jet Aeroacoustics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1