Bowley Insurance with Expected Utility Maximization of the Policyholders

IF 1.4 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE North American Actuarial Journal Pub Date : 2023-07-19 DOI:10.1080/10920277.2023.2213295
Tim J. Boonen, Wenjun Jiang
{"title":"Bowley Insurance with Expected Utility Maximization of the Policyholders","authors":"Tim J. Boonen, Wenjun Jiang","doi":"10.1080/10920277.2023.2213295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article studies the Bowley solution for a sequential game within the expected utility framework. We assume that the policyholders are expected utility maximizers and there exists a representative policyholder who faces a fixed loss with given probability and no loss otherwise. This policyholder selects the optimal indemnity function in response to the pricing kernel set by the insurer. Knowing the policyholder’s choice of indemnity function, the insurer adjusts the pricing kernel to maximize its expected net profit. This pricing kernel is of our central interest in this article, and in our setting the pricing kernel can be evaluated via the safety loading factor in an expected value premium principle. For a wide class of utility functions, we show that the optimal safety loading factor increases with respect to both the policyholder’s risk aversion level and the probability of zero loss. We also show that the insurance contract corresponding to the Bowley solution is Pareto dominated in the sense that both parties’ interests can be further improved, which shows the inefficiency of the Bowley solution. Some numerical examples are presented to illustrate the main results, and it is shown that both the policyholder and insurer can strictly benefit from the Bowley solution.</p>","PeriodicalId":46812,"journal":{"name":"North American Actuarial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Actuarial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10920277.2023.2213295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article studies the Bowley solution for a sequential game within the expected utility framework. We assume that the policyholders are expected utility maximizers and there exists a representative policyholder who faces a fixed loss with given probability and no loss otherwise. This policyholder selects the optimal indemnity function in response to the pricing kernel set by the insurer. Knowing the policyholder’s choice of indemnity function, the insurer adjusts the pricing kernel to maximize its expected net profit. This pricing kernel is of our central interest in this article, and in our setting the pricing kernel can be evaluated via the safety loading factor in an expected value premium principle. For a wide class of utility functions, we show that the optimal safety loading factor increases with respect to both the policyholder’s risk aversion level and the probability of zero loss. We also show that the insurance contract corresponding to the Bowley solution is Pareto dominated in the sense that both parties’ interests can be further improved, which shows the inefficiency of the Bowley solution. Some numerical examples are presented to illustrate the main results, and it is shown that both the policyholder and insurer can strictly benefit from the Bowley solution.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
投保人期望效用最大化的鲍利保险
本文研究了预期效用框架下序列博弈的Bowley解。我们假设投保人是期望效用最大化者,并且存在一个具有代表性的投保人,他以给定的概率面临固定损失,而在其他情况下没有损失。投保人根据保险人设定的定价核选择最优赔偿函数。保险人在了解投保人对赔偿函数的选择后,调整定价核,使其期望净利润最大化。这个定价内核是我们在本文中最感兴趣的,在我们的设置中,定价内核可以通过期望值溢价原则中的安全加载系数来评估。对于一类广泛的效用函数,我们证明了最优安全负荷系数随投保人的风险厌恶水平和零损失概率的增加而增加。我们还证明了鲍利解对应的保险契约是帕累托支配的,这意味着双方的利益都可以进一步提高,这表明了鲍利解的无效率性。通过数值算例说明了本文的主要结论,结果表明投保人和保险人都能从Bowley解中严格获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
A Proposed Condition-Based Risk Adjustment System for the Colombian Health Insurance Program Reducing Medical Costs of Health Insurance: The COVID-19 Stress Testing and Portfolio Effects Credibility Theory for Variance Premium Principle Discussion on “Sample Size Determination for Credibility Estimation,” by Liang Hong, Volume 26(4) Author’s Reply to Discussion on “Sample Size Determination for Credibility Estimation”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1