Do Celebrity Endorsements Matter? a Twitter Experiment Promoting Vaccination in Indonesia

Vivi Alatas, Arun G Chandrasekhar, Markus Mobius, Benjamin A Olken, Cindy Paladines
{"title":"Do Celebrity Endorsements Matter? a Twitter Experiment Promoting Vaccination in Indonesia","authors":"Vivi Alatas, Arun G Chandrasekhar, Markus Mobius, Benjamin A Olken, Cindy Paladines","doi":"10.1093/ej/uead102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Do celebrity endorsements matter? And if so, how can celebrities communicate effectively? We conduct a nationwide Twitter experiment in Indonesia promoting vaccination. Celebrity messages are 72 percent more likely to be passed on or liked than similar messages without a celebrity’s imprimatur. In total, 66 percent of the celebrity effect comes from authorship, compared to passing on messages. Citing external medical sources decreases retweets by 27 percent. Phone surveys show that those randomly exposed to messaging have fewer incorrect beliefs and report more vaccination among friends and neighbours. The results can inform public health campaigns and celebrity public service more generally.","PeriodicalId":501319,"journal":{"name":"The Economic Journal","volume":"36 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Economic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/uead102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Do celebrity endorsements matter? And if so, how can celebrities communicate effectively? We conduct a nationwide Twitter experiment in Indonesia promoting vaccination. Celebrity messages are 72 percent more likely to be passed on or liked than similar messages without a celebrity’s imprimatur. In total, 66 percent of the celebrity effect comes from authorship, compared to passing on messages. Citing external medical sources decreases retweets by 27 percent. Phone surveys show that those randomly exposed to messaging have fewer incorrect beliefs and report more vaccination among friends and neighbours. The results can inform public health campaigns and celebrity public service more generally.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
名人代言重要吗?在印度尼西亚推广疫苗接种的推特实验
名人代言重要吗?如果是这样,名人如何有效地沟通?我们在印度尼西亚进行了一项全国性的推特实验,以促进疫苗接种。与没有名人签名的类似信息相比,名人信息被转发或点赞的可能性要高72%。总的来说,66%的名人效应来自原创,而不是传递信息。引用外部医疗来源会减少27%的转发量。电话调查显示,那些随机接触短信的人有更少的错误信念,并报告朋友和邻居接种了更多疫苗。研究结果可以更广泛地为公共卫生运动和名人公共服务提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimal Taxation of Capital Income with Heterogeneous Rates of Return Lobbying for Globalisation Healthcare Appointments as Commitment Devices House prices and misallocation: the impact of the collateral channel on productivity Trading stocks builds financial confidence and compresses the gender gap
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1