Ruling by information, governing by records: the spoken and written grammar of power in post-communal Italy (c. 1350–1520)

Isabella Lazzarini
{"title":"Ruling by information, governing by records: the spoken and written grammar of power in post-communal Italy (c. 1350–1520)","authors":"Isabella Lazzarini","doi":"10.1080/13507486.2023.2215806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>ABSTRACT</b></p><p>Recent research has widely emphasized the role of public written records and data-managing strategies in late-medieval governmental growth. The necessity to control information and to assure that a timely stream of news and communications circulated among the various components of a composite domain became central for princes and governments. Such a need was translated into new documentary techniques and archival organization by the endless work of many professionals at various territorial levels. However, the increasing recourse to recorded information was a multifaceted phenomenon. To better understand its complexity, the essay will investigate the intersection of spoken and written strategies of information-gathering and negotiation. Secondly, the paper will also take into account the ambivalent dynamics underlying the recording of the various means required not only to rule a composite territorial domain, but also to control its administrative, judicial and fiscal geography. Whereas the use of written records became the norm for the establishment of a new political order, that practice sometimes, and for different reasons, also contributed to preserving the memory of a different past. In order to adequately capitalize on late-medieval Italy’s complexity, the essay will examine different records and different contexts. The examples will be taken from a set of composite polities in post-communal northern and central Italy (ranging from Milan to Florence or Mantua) which shared some common features, but which were also different in size, strength, ideological models and material constitution. The considered timespan will be a long Quattrocento going from the mid-fourteenth to the early sixteenth century.</p>","PeriodicalId":501352,"journal":{"name":"European Review of History: Revue europ√©enne d'histoire","volume":"67 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of History: Revue europ√©enne d'histoire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13507486.2023.2215806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Recent research has widely emphasized the role of public written records and data-managing strategies in late-medieval governmental growth. The necessity to control information and to assure that a timely stream of news and communications circulated among the various components of a composite domain became central for princes and governments. Such a need was translated into new documentary techniques and archival organization by the endless work of many professionals at various territorial levels. However, the increasing recourse to recorded information was a multifaceted phenomenon. To better understand its complexity, the essay will investigate the intersection of spoken and written strategies of information-gathering and negotiation. Secondly, the paper will also take into account the ambivalent dynamics underlying the recording of the various means required not only to rule a composite territorial domain, but also to control its administrative, judicial and fiscal geography. Whereas the use of written records became the norm for the establishment of a new political order, that practice sometimes, and for different reasons, also contributed to preserving the memory of a different past. In order to adequately capitalize on late-medieval Italy’s complexity, the essay will examine different records and different contexts. The examples will be taken from a set of composite polities in post-communal northern and central Italy (ranging from Milan to Florence or Mantua) which shared some common features, but which were also different in size, strength, ideological models and material constitution. The considered timespan will be a long Quattrocento going from the mid-fourteenth to the early sixteenth century.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信息统治,记录统治:后公共意大利的口头和书面权力语法(约1350-1520)
摘要最近的研究广泛强调了公共书面记录和数据管理策略在中世纪晚期政府发展中的作用。控制信息的必要性,以及确保新闻和通信在一个复合领域的各个组成部分之间及时传播的必要性,成为君主和政府的核心。这种需要通过许多专业人员在各个地区的无休止的工作转化为新的记录技术和档案组织。然而,越来越多地求助于记录资料是一个多方面的现象。为了更好地理解其复杂性,本文将调查信息收集和谈判的口头和书面策略的交集。其次,本文还将考虑到记录各种手段背后的矛盾动态,这些手段不仅需要统治一个复合的领土领域,而且需要控制其行政、司法和财政地理。虽然使用书面记录成为建立新的政治秩序的规范,但这种做法有时也有助于保存对不同过去的记忆,原因不同。为了充分利用中世纪晚期意大利的复杂性,本文将研究不同的记录和不同的背景。这些例子将取自意大利北部和中部(从米兰到佛罗伦萨或曼图亚)的一系列复合政治,它们有一些共同的特征,但在规模、力量、意识形态模式和物质构成方面也有所不同。考虑的时间跨度将是一个漫长的四世纪,从十四世纪中期到十六世纪早期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The re-making of a Europe of differences: mobile lives and the globalization of categories in revolutionary and post-imperial times (c.1770–1970) The rise and fall of the people’s parties: a history of democracy in Western Europe since 1918 ‘For everything, the local priest is a helper in adversity’: Catholic clergy and the new order in post-Habsburg Tyrol Géopolitiques de la culture: L’artiste, le diplomate et l’entrepreneur Former Hungarian civil servants on the territory of Slovakia amid the first years of the Czechoslovak Republic, 1919–24: a case study on the status regulation of teachers and postal employees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1