A Study and Analysis of Disease Identification using Genomic Sequence Processing Models: An Empirical Review

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2023-11-29 DOI:10.2174/0113892029269523231101051455
Sony K. Ahuja, Deepti D. Shrimankar, Aditi R. Durge
{"title":"A Study and Analysis of Disease Identification using Genomic Sequence Processing Models: An Empirical Review","authors":"Sony K. Ahuja, Deepti D. Shrimankar, Aditi R. Durge","doi":"10.2174/0113892029269523231101051455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Human gene sequences are considered a primary source of comprehensive information about different body conditions. A wide variety of diseases including cancer, heart issues, brain issues, genetic issues, etc. can be pre-empted via efficient analysis of genomic sequences. Researchers have proposed different configurations of machine learning models for processing genomic sequences, and each of these models varies in terms of their performance & applicability characteristics. Models that use bioinspired optimizations are generally slower, but have superior incrementalperformance, while models that use one-shot learning achieve higher instantaneous accuracy but cannot be scaled for larger disease-sets. Due to such variations, it is difficult for genomic system designers to identify optimum models for their application-specific & performance-specific use cases. To overcome this issue, a detailed survey of different genomic processing models in terms of their functional nuances, application-specific advantages, deployment-specific limitations, and contextual future scopes is discussed in this text. Based on this discussion, researchers will be able to identify optimal models for their functional use cases. This text also compares the reviewed models in terms of their quantitative parameter sets, which include, the accuracy of classification, delay needed to classify large-length sequences, precision levels, scalability levels, and deployment cost, which will assist readers in selecting deployment-specific models for their contextual clinical scenarios. This text also evaluates a novel Genome Processing Efficiency Rank (GPER) for each of these models, which will allow readers to identify models with higher performance and low overheads under real-time scenarios.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0113892029269523231101051455","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Human gene sequences are considered a primary source of comprehensive information about different body conditions. A wide variety of diseases including cancer, heart issues, brain issues, genetic issues, etc. can be pre-empted via efficient analysis of genomic sequences. Researchers have proposed different configurations of machine learning models for processing genomic sequences, and each of these models varies in terms of their performance & applicability characteristics. Models that use bioinspired optimizations are generally slower, but have superior incrementalperformance, while models that use one-shot learning achieve higher instantaneous accuracy but cannot be scaled for larger disease-sets. Due to such variations, it is difficult for genomic system designers to identify optimum models for their application-specific & performance-specific use cases. To overcome this issue, a detailed survey of different genomic processing models in terms of their functional nuances, application-specific advantages, deployment-specific limitations, and contextual future scopes is discussed in this text. Based on this discussion, researchers will be able to identify optimal models for their functional use cases. This text also compares the reviewed models in terms of their quantitative parameter sets, which include, the accuracy of classification, delay needed to classify large-length sequences, precision levels, scalability levels, and deployment cost, which will assist readers in selecting deployment-specific models for their contextual clinical scenarios. This text also evaluates a novel Genome Processing Efficiency Rank (GPER) for each of these models, which will allow readers to identify models with higher performance and low overheads under real-time scenarios.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于基因组序列处理模型的疾病识别研究与分析
人类基因序列被认为是不同身体状况综合信息的主要来源。各种各样的疾病,包括癌症、心脏问题、大脑问题、遗传问题等,可以通过有效的基因组序列分析来预防。研究人员提出了不同配置的机器学习模型来处理基因组序列,每种模型的性能各不相同。适用性的特点。使用生物启发优化的模型通常较慢,但具有优越的增量性能,而使用一次性学习的模型可以实现更高的瞬时精度,但无法扩展到更大的疾病集。由于这些变化,基因组系统设计者很难确定适合其特定应用的最佳模型。特定于性能的用例。为了克服这个问题,本文讨论了不同基因组处理模型在功能上的细微差别、特定于应用的优势、特定于部署的限制和上下文未来范围等方面的详细调查。基于此讨论,研究人员将能够为他们的功能用例确定最佳模型。本文还比较了在其定量参数集方面审查的模型,其中包括,分类的准确性,分类大长度序列所需的延迟,精度水平,可扩展性水平和部署成本,这将有助于读者选择部署特定的模型为他们的上下文临床场景。本文还评估了一个新的基因组处理效率等级(GPER)为每个这些模型,这将使读者能够识别模型具有更高的性能和低开销下的实时场景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1