Qiṣāṣ in the Modern State: Searching for the Victim’s Family in Middle Eastern Criminal Law

IF 0.5 Q3 LAW Arab Law Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-11-21 DOI:10.1163/15730255-bja10127
Brian Wright
{"title":"Qiṣāṣ in the Modern State: Searching for the Victim’s Family in Middle Eastern Criminal Law","authors":"Brian Wright","doi":"10.1163/15730255-bja10127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article traces the development of the role of the victim’s family (<jats:italic>awliyāʾ al-damm</jats:italic>) in Middle Eastern legal systems. In the pre-modern period, most Muslim jurists saw the right of the victim’s family to determine the punishment for homicide as central to retaliation (<jats:italic>qiṣāṣ</jats:italic>) and gave political authorities a limited ability to punish offenders. As the modern state expanded in the nineteenth century, new codes provided room for governments to enact punishment and eventually removed the role of the family altogether, a move challenged by Islamists in the twentieth century. This article argues that although growing state power is an important backdrop against which legal development took place, it must also be recognized that the solutions created did not sideline the <jats:italic>šarīʿa</jats:italic>. Instead, reformers engaged with existing Islamic debates on balancing individual and societal rights to justify change, choosing interpretations that fit into evolving circumstances.","PeriodicalId":43925,"journal":{"name":"Arab Law Quarterly","volume":"202 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab Law Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15730255-bja10127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article traces the development of the role of the victim’s family (awliyāʾ al-damm) in Middle Eastern legal systems. In the pre-modern period, most Muslim jurists saw the right of the victim’s family to determine the punishment for homicide as central to retaliation (qiṣāṣ) and gave political authorities a limited ability to punish offenders. As the modern state expanded in the nineteenth century, new codes provided room for governments to enact punishment and eventually removed the role of the family altogether, a move challenged by Islamists in the twentieth century. This article argues that although growing state power is an important backdrop against which legal development took place, it must also be recognized that the solutions created did not sideline the šarīʿa. Instead, reformers engaged with existing Islamic debates on balancing individual and societal rights to justify change, choosing interpretations that fit into evolving circumstances.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Qiṣāṣ在现代国家:寻找中东刑法中的受害者家庭
本文追溯了受害者家属在中东法律制度中角色的发展。在前现代时期,大多数穆斯林法学家认为受害者家属决定对杀人的惩罚的权利是报复的核心(qiṣāṣ),并赋予政治当局惩罚罪犯的有限能力。随着现代国家在19世纪的扩张,新的法典为政府制定惩罚提供了空间,并最终完全消除了家庭的作用,这一举动在20世纪受到了伊斯兰主义者的挑战。本文认为,尽管不断增长的国家权力是法律发展发生的重要背景,但也必须认识到,所创造的解决方案并没有将šarī al边缘化。取而代之的是,改革者参与了现存的关于平衡个人和社会权利的伊斯兰辩论,以证明变革的合理性,选择了适合不断变化的环境的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The leading English-language legal publication in its field, Arab Law Quarterly covers all aspects of Arab laws, both Shari"a and secular. Now in its third decade, it provides an important forum of authoritative articles on the laws and legal developments throughout the twenty countries of the Arab world, notes on recent legislation and case law, guidelines on future changes, and reviews of the latest literature in the field. Particular subject areas covered are Arab laws in trans-national affairs, commercial law, Islamic law (the Shari´a), and international comparative law.
期刊最新文献
Family Business Challenges and their Regulations under UAE Family Business Law A Second Violation of the Sharia Provision: Egypt’s SCC’s Ruling of 12 May 2013, in the Case No. 37/xxxiii (Annotated and Translated) Islamic Constitutionalism in Pakistan Do Adjectives Matter? Exploring the ‘Islamic’ in Constitutions and Constitutionalism(s) The 2020 Revision of the Algerian Constitution and the Ḥirāk: Returning to Constitutional Order after the Institutional Disorders of 2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1