Achieving the maximum size for exchange problems with dichotomous preferences

IF 1.2 3区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Economic Theory Pub Date : 2023-11-17 DOI:10.1007/s00199-023-01536-7
Yan Long
{"title":"Achieving the maximum size for exchange problems with dichotomous preferences","authors":"Yan Long","doi":"10.1007/s00199-023-01536-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We consider an exchange problem with dichotomous preferences, and agents endowed with acceptable (unacceptable) objects can exchange their endowments with other acceptable (unacceptable) objects in order to achieve the “maximum size” of the problem, that is, the maximum number of agents who obtain acceptable objects. We observe that the priority mechanisms appeared in the literature before are not fully incentive-compatible—agents may pretend that their endowments are acceptable to themselves to get better results. We construct a new class of mechanisms called “endowment-respecting priority mechanisms” to solve this problem. Our mechanisms are dominant strategy incentive-compatible, individually rational, and always achieve the maximum size.</p>","PeriodicalId":47982,"journal":{"name":"Economic Theory","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Theory","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-023-01536-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We consider an exchange problem with dichotomous preferences, and agents endowed with acceptable (unacceptable) objects can exchange their endowments with other acceptable (unacceptable) objects in order to achieve the “maximum size” of the problem, that is, the maximum number of agents who obtain acceptable objects. We observe that the priority mechanisms appeared in the literature before are not fully incentive-compatible—agents may pretend that their endowments are acceptable to themselves to get better results. We construct a new class of mechanisms called “endowment-respecting priority mechanisms” to solve this problem. Our mechanisms are dominant strategy incentive-compatible, individually rational, and always achieve the maximum size.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实现具有二分类偏好的交换问题的最大规模
我们考虑一个具有二分类偏好的交换问题,具有可接受(不可接受)对象的智能体可以与其他可接受(不可接受)对象交换其禀赋,以实现问题的“最大规模”,即获得可接受对象的智能体的最大数量。我们观察到,之前文献中出现的优先机制并不是完全激励兼容的——代理人可能会假装他们的禀赋是自己可以接受的,以获得更好的结果。为了解决这一问题,我们构建了一类新的机制,称为“尊重禀赋的优先机制”。我们的机制具有优势策略、激励相容、个体理性、总能达到最大规模的特点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Theory
Economic Theory ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
23.10%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The purpose of Economic Theory is to provide an outlet for research - in all areas of economics based on rigorous theoretical reasoning, and - on specific topics in mathematics which is motivated by the analysis of economic problems. Economic Theory''s scope encompasses - but is not limited to - the following fields. - classical and modern equilibrium theory - cooperative and non-cooperative game theory - macroeconomics - social choice and welfare - uncertainty and information, intertemporal economics (including dynamical systems) - public economics - international and developmental economics - financial economics, money and banking - industrial organization Economic Theory also publishes surveys if they clearly picture the basic ideas at work in some areas, the essential technical apparatus which is used and the central questions which remain open. The development of a productive dialectic between stylized facts and abstract formulations requires that economic relevance be at the forefront. Thus, correct, and innovative, mathematical analysis is not enough; it must be motivated by - and contribute to - the understanding of substantive economic problems. Officially cited as: Econ Theory
期刊最新文献
Information design for weighted voting Beyond Hawks and Doves: Can inequality ease coordination? Everybody’s talkin’ at me: levels of majority language acquisition by minority language speakers Central bank communication and stabilization policies under firms’ motivated beliefs Transfers in climate action teams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1