Contrasting Norway spruce disturbance dynamics in managed forests and strict forest reserves in Slovakia

IF 3 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY Forestry Pub Date : 2022-11-09 DOI:10.1093/forestry/cpac045
Mária Potterf, Marek Svitok, Pavel Mezei, Benjamín Jarčuška, Rastislav Jakuš, Miroslav Blaženec, Tomáš Hlásny
{"title":"Contrasting Norway spruce disturbance dynamics in managed forests and strict forest reserves in Slovakia","authors":"Mária Potterf, Marek Svitok, Pavel Mezei, Benjamín Jarčuška, Rastislav Jakuš, Miroslav Blaženec, Tomáš Hlásny","doi":"10.1093/forestry/cpac045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forest disturbances are intensifying globally, yet regional drivers of these dynamics remain poorly understood. We investigated recent disturbance intensities in Norway spruce (Picea abies L.) forests in Slovakia (Central Europe) with different management objectives in 2000–2017 based on Landsat imagery. We focused on 122 strict reserves without any management, their actively managed surroundings (500 m and 2000 m buffers), and managed production forests beyond the buffer areas. We used generalized additive mixed models to test for differences in temporal trends of disturbance intensity among these management categories. We found that disturbance intensity was increasing in all management categories during the studied period. The increase was more pronounced in the managed forests (compound annual disturbance rate 1.76% year−1) and the 2000 m buffer (2.21% year−1) than in the strict reserves (0.58% year−1). The predicted cumulative disturbance during the 18-year period was 9.9% in the reserves and 30.5% in the 2000 m buffer. We found that forests in nature reserves can be more resistant to disturbances than forests managed for timber production, despite management efforts to control disturbances in managed forests. Our findings can help reconcile the different perceptions of natural disturbances and their management in Central Europe and support climate-adapted management strategies that consider natural disturbances as an indispensable component of ecosystem dynamics.","PeriodicalId":12342,"journal":{"name":"Forestry","volume":"323 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpac045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forest disturbances are intensifying globally, yet regional drivers of these dynamics remain poorly understood. We investigated recent disturbance intensities in Norway spruce (Picea abies L.) forests in Slovakia (Central Europe) with different management objectives in 2000–2017 based on Landsat imagery. We focused on 122 strict reserves without any management, their actively managed surroundings (500 m and 2000 m buffers), and managed production forests beyond the buffer areas. We used generalized additive mixed models to test for differences in temporal trends of disturbance intensity among these management categories. We found that disturbance intensity was increasing in all management categories during the studied period. The increase was more pronounced in the managed forests (compound annual disturbance rate 1.76% year−1) and the 2000 m buffer (2.21% year−1) than in the strict reserves (0.58% year−1). The predicted cumulative disturbance during the 18-year period was 9.9% in the reserves and 30.5% in the 2000 m buffer. We found that forests in nature reserves can be more resistant to disturbances than forests managed for timber production, despite management efforts to control disturbances in managed forests. Our findings can help reconcile the different perceptions of natural disturbances and their management in Central Europe and support climate-adapted management strategies that consider natural disturbances as an indispensable component of ecosystem dynamics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对比管理森林中的挪威云杉扰动动态和斯洛伐克严格的森林保护区
全球森林扰动正在加剧,但对这些动态的区域驱动因素仍知之甚少。基于Landsat图像,研究了2000-2017年中欧斯洛伐克不同管理目标的挪威云杉(Picea abies L.)森林近期的干扰强度。我们重点关注了122个没有任何管理的严格保护区,积极管理其周围环境(500米和2000米缓冲带),并管理缓冲区以外的生产林。我们使用广义加性混合模型来检验这些管理类别中干扰强度的时间趋势差异。我们发现,在研究期间,所有管理类别的干扰强度都在增加。人工林(年复合干扰率为1.76%)和2000 m缓冲带(年复合干扰率为2.21%)比严格保护林(年复合干扰率为0.58%)的增加更为明显。18年累积扰动预测值在保护区为9.9%,在2000 m缓冲带为30.5%。我们发现,尽管管理人员努力控制管理森林中的干扰,但自然保护区的森林比木材生产管理的森林更能抵御干扰。我们的研究结果有助于调和中欧对自然干扰及其管理的不同看法,并支持将自然干扰视为生态系统动力学不可或缺的组成部分的气候适应管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forestry
Forestry 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
47
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal is inclusive of all subjects, geographical zones and study locations, including trees in urban environments, plantations and natural forests. We welcome papers that consider economic, environmental and social factors and, in particular, studies that take an integrated approach to sustainable management. In considering suitability for publication, attention is given to the originality of contributions and their likely impact on policy and practice, as well as their contribution to the development of knowledge. Special Issues - each year one edition of Forestry will be a Special Issue and will focus on one subject in detail; this will usually be by publication of the proceedings of an international meeting.
期刊最新文献
Testing treecbh in Central European forests: an R package for crown base height detection using high-resolution aerial laser-scanned data Impact of coarse woody debris on habitat use of two sympatric rodent species in the temperate Białowieża Forest Current understanding and future prospects for ash dieback disease with a focus on Britain Comparison of population genetic structure of Pinus mugo Turra forest stands in the Giant Mountains by analysis of nSSR molecular marker data Managing harvesting residues: a systematic review of management treatments around the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1