{"title":"How do ASA Ethical Guidelines Support U.S. Guidelines for Official Statistics?","authors":"Jennifer Park, Rochelle E. Tractenberg","doi":"arxiv-2309.07180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2022, the American Statistical Association revised its Ethical Guidelines\nfor Statistical Practice. Originally issued in 1982, these Guidelines describe\nresponsibilities of the 'ethical statistical practitioner' to their profession,\nto their research subjects, as well as to their community of practice. These\nguidelines are intended as a framework to assist decision-making by\nstatisticians working across academic, research, and government environments.\nFor the first time, the 2022 Guidelines describe the ethical obligations of\norganizations and institutions that use statistical practice. This paper\nexamines alignment between the ASA Ethical Guidelines and other\nlong-established normative guidelines for US official statistics: the OMB\nStatistical Policy Directives 1, 2, and 2a NASEM Principles and Practices, and\nthe OMB Data Ethics Tenets. Our analyses ask how the recently updated ASA\nEthical Guidelines can support these guidelines for federal statistics and data\nscience. The analysis uses a form of qualitative content analysis, the\nalignment model, to identify patterns of alignment, and potential for tensions,\nwithin and across guidelines. The paper concludes with recommendations to\npolicy makers when using ethical guidance to establish parameters for policy\nchange and the administrative and technical controls that necessarily follow.","PeriodicalId":501323,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics","volume":"27 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2309.07180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In 2022, the American Statistical Association revised its Ethical Guidelines
for Statistical Practice. Originally issued in 1982, these Guidelines describe
responsibilities of the 'ethical statistical practitioner' to their profession,
to their research subjects, as well as to their community of practice. These
guidelines are intended as a framework to assist decision-making by
statisticians working across academic, research, and government environments.
For the first time, the 2022 Guidelines describe the ethical obligations of
organizations and institutions that use statistical practice. This paper
examines alignment between the ASA Ethical Guidelines and other
long-established normative guidelines for US official statistics: the OMB
Statistical Policy Directives 1, 2, and 2a NASEM Principles and Practices, and
the OMB Data Ethics Tenets. Our analyses ask how the recently updated ASA
Ethical Guidelines can support these guidelines for federal statistics and data
science. The analysis uses a form of qualitative content analysis, the
alignment model, to identify patterns of alignment, and potential for tensions,
within and across guidelines. The paper concludes with recommendations to
policy makers when using ethical guidance to establish parameters for policy
change and the administrative and technical controls that necessarily follow.