Debts

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW Pub Date : 2023-11-29 DOI:10.1353/abr.2023.a913416
Dan-el Padilla Peralta
{"title":"Debts","authors":"Dan-el Padilla Peralta","doi":"10.1353/abr.2023.a913416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Debts <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Dan-el Padilla Peralta (bio) </li> </ul> <blockquote> <p>Only way he comin' back is through his unborns</p> —Lil Wayne, \"Uproar\" (2018) </blockquote> <p>Recently I've been spending some time in the intellectual company of longtermists, not because I find their arguments persuasive but because they seem to have stumbled upon an effective rhetorical strategy. As I understand it, their move is to direct attention away from the muddy moral universe of the present to that final frontier of the far-off future, so invitingly fraught in the glistening promise of its unknowability. And there's no denying the strategy's success: books here, media coverage there, stacks of funding everywhere. Yet the more I read the longtermists, the more they seem like twenty-first-century versions of Augustine of Hippo, their heavenly city populated by blissed-out distant generations. But I'm convinced, too, that, much like Augustine's, their fixation on the future contains an important message about the valuation of the past. It's a message about valuation and struggle.</p> <p>I use the word <em>valuation</em> carefully. I want to think about value. The longtermists would have us assign the greatest value to the lives of future generations, indeed of future selves: vast, in fact potentially unknowably vast, in their quantity, and therefore exerting obligations on us by the sheer force of their number. But I submit that the greatest obligations we have are not to selves in the future whom (with the exception of our children, grandchildren, and, if we're lucky, great-grandchildren) we won't ever know, but to the selves of the past whom we can, at least in principle, come to know. Not in the fullness of their personal interiority, of course; even the recently dead are shadowy, and those dead for many years or decades or centuries or millennia much more so. But because they existed, we can come to know them, and cultivate relationships with them, in ways precluded by the still-not-existence of the unborn. And the mere <em>prospect</em> of those relationships creates ethical demands. The realization of those demands comes down, ultimately, to the business of value, and to the necessity of struggle. <strong>[End Page 64]</strong></p> <p>The field that has come to be known as Classics is all about value. That much is apparent from its very name. If we are not to disavow that name (and I think there are good reasons for doing just that), then we need to think harder about the demands and merits of struggling for value in a way that simultaneously honors our obligation to this confounded and confounding world, and to the pasts—and past people—who brought this world into being. My belief is that this struggle must be <em>reparative</em>: not only must it directly confront the ill-gotten gains of racial capitalism, it must actively seek to reverse and redistribute them. This struggle is unavoidably political in nature; nothing is gained by pretending that it is not.</p> <h2>________</h2> <p>The trailblazer doyenne of Black Studies, Sylvia Wynter, has repeatedly singled out the \"overrepresentation of Man\" as a defining feature of early global modernity. By this she specifically means the elevation of the white European male as paradigm of rationality and subjecthood, as cornerstone of what counts as fully Human. This elevation moves in rhythm with the global transformation that, taking off in the centuries after the first contact of 1492, draws its fuel from settler colonialism and racial capitalism. The overrepresentation of Man is inconceivable without these two processes, which also interact with one of the signature features of the construction of the Human as a category in early modernity: the reanimation of ancient Greece and Rome in connection with Renaissance humanism. I see my work as committed, in the first instance, to confronting the legacies of that overrepresentation, which warps our ability to construct and engage responsibly with the ancient Mediterranean past and with the history of those disciplines that emerge around that past's study. But there is no effective method for ethical recovery and attentiveness to the pluralisms of the past, and to the staggering diversity of that past, that can exist independently of the struggle to redistribute the resources that...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":41337,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/abr.2023.a913416","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Debts
  • Dan-el Padilla Peralta (bio)

Only way he comin' back is through his unborns

—Lil Wayne, "Uproar" (2018)

Recently I've been spending some time in the intellectual company of longtermists, not because I find their arguments persuasive but because they seem to have stumbled upon an effective rhetorical strategy. As I understand it, their move is to direct attention away from the muddy moral universe of the present to that final frontier of the far-off future, so invitingly fraught in the glistening promise of its unknowability. And there's no denying the strategy's success: books here, media coverage there, stacks of funding everywhere. Yet the more I read the longtermists, the more they seem like twenty-first-century versions of Augustine of Hippo, their heavenly city populated by blissed-out distant generations. But I'm convinced, too, that, much like Augustine's, their fixation on the future contains an important message about the valuation of the past. It's a message about valuation and struggle.

I use the word valuation carefully. I want to think about value. The longtermists would have us assign the greatest value to the lives of future generations, indeed of future selves: vast, in fact potentially unknowably vast, in their quantity, and therefore exerting obligations on us by the sheer force of their number. But I submit that the greatest obligations we have are not to selves in the future whom (with the exception of our children, grandchildren, and, if we're lucky, great-grandchildren) we won't ever know, but to the selves of the past whom we can, at least in principle, come to know. Not in the fullness of their personal interiority, of course; even the recently dead are shadowy, and those dead for many years or decades or centuries or millennia much more so. But because they existed, we can come to know them, and cultivate relationships with them, in ways precluded by the still-not-existence of the unborn. And the mere prospect of those relationships creates ethical demands. The realization of those demands comes down, ultimately, to the business of value, and to the necessity of struggle. [End Page 64]

The field that has come to be known as Classics is all about value. That much is apparent from its very name. If we are not to disavow that name (and I think there are good reasons for doing just that), then we need to think harder about the demands and merits of struggling for value in a way that simultaneously honors our obligation to this confounded and confounding world, and to the pasts—and past people—who brought this world into being. My belief is that this struggle must be reparative: not only must it directly confront the ill-gotten gains of racial capitalism, it must actively seek to reverse and redistribute them. This struggle is unavoidably political in nature; nothing is gained by pretending that it is not.

________

The trailblazer doyenne of Black Studies, Sylvia Wynter, has repeatedly singled out the "overrepresentation of Man" as a defining feature of early global modernity. By this she specifically means the elevation of the white European male as paradigm of rationality and subjecthood, as cornerstone of what counts as fully Human. This elevation moves in rhythm with the global transformation that, taking off in the centuries after the first contact of 1492, draws its fuel from settler colonialism and racial capitalism. The overrepresentation of Man is inconceivable without these two processes, which also interact with one of the signature features of the construction of the Human as a category in early modernity: the reanimation of ancient Greece and Rome in connection with Renaissance humanism. I see my work as committed, in the first instance, to confronting the legacies of that overrepresentation, which warps our ability to construct and engage responsibly with the ancient Mediterranean past and with the history of those disciplines that emerge around that past's study. But there is no effective method for ethical recovery and attentiveness to the pluralisms of the past, and to the staggering diversity of that past, that can exist independently of the struggle to redistribute the resources that...

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
债务
为了代替摘要,这里有一个简短的内容摘录:债务丹-埃尔·帕迪拉·佩拉尔塔(传记)他回来的唯一途径是通过他的未出生者——lil Wayne,《骚动》(2018)最近,我花了一些时间和长期主义者的知识分子在一起,不是因为我发现他们的论点有说服力,而是因为他们似乎偶然发现了一种有效的修辞策略。据我所知,他们的目的是将人们的注意力从当前混乱的道德世界转移到遥远未来的最后疆域,那里充满了不可知的光明前景,非常诱人。不可否认,这一策略取得了成功:这里有书,那里有媒体报道,到处都是成堆的资金。然而,我越是读长期主义者的书,就越觉得他们更像是21世纪版的奥古斯丁的河马,他们的天堂之城居住着幸福的远祖。但我也确信,就像奥古斯丁的观点一样,他们对未来的执着包含着对过去估值的重要信息。这是一个关于估值和挣扎的信息。我谨慎地使用“估值”这个词。我想考虑价值。长期主义者会让我们把最大的价值赋予子孙后代的生命,实际上是未来的自己:他们的数量巨大,实际上可能是不为人知的巨大,因此,他们的数量之多对我们施加了义务。但我认为,我们最大的义务不是对未来的自己(除了我们的子女、孙辈,如果幸运的话,还有曾孙),我们永远不知道未来的自己,而是对过去的自己,至少在原则上,我们可以了解过去的自己。当然,不是在他们个人内在的丰满中;即使是刚死不久的人也会有阴影,而那些死去多年、几十年、几百年或上千年的人更是如此。但因为他们的存在,我们可以了解他们,并培养与他们的关系,以未出生的人仍然不存在的方式。仅仅是这些关系的前景就会产生道德要求。这些要求的实现归根到底归结为价值的问题,归结为斗争的必要性。这个被称为“经典”的领域都是关于价值的。从它的名字就可以看出这一点。如果我们不否认这个名字(我认为有很好的理由这样做),那么我们需要更加努力地思考为价值而奋斗的要求和优点,同时尊重我们对这个混乱和混乱的世界的义务,以及对创造这个世界的过去和过去的人的义务。我的信念是,这场斗争必须是补偿性的:它不仅必须直接面对种族资本主义的不义之财,而且必须积极寻求扭转和重新分配它们。这种斗争在本质上不可避免地是政治性的;假装没有得到任何东西。________黑人研究的先驱者,西尔维娅·温特(Sylvia Wynter)一再指出,“人类的过度代表”是早期全球现代性的一个决定性特征。通过这一点,她特别指的是欧洲白人男性作为理性和主体性典范的提升,作为什么是完全人类的基石。在1492年第一次接触后的几个世纪里,全球转型开始起飞,这种提升与全球转型的节奏同步,从定居者殖民主义和种族资本主义中汲取动力。没有这两个过程,人的过度再现是不可想象的,这两个过程也与早期现代性中人类作为一个类别的建构的标志性特征之一相互作用:古希腊和罗马与文艺复兴人文主义的复兴。首先,我认为我的工作是致力于面对这种过度代表性的遗留问题,它扭曲了我们以负责任的方式构建和参与古代地中海过去以及围绕过去研究而出现的那些学科的历史的能力。但是,没有一种有效的方法可以使我们在道德上恢复,并关注过去的多元主义,以及过去的惊人多样性,而这种多样性可以独立于重新分配资源的斗争而存在……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW
AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW LITERATURE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
It's the Algorithm, Stupid! Conspiracy Theories in the Time of Covid-19 by Clare Birchall and Peter Knight (review) A Lot of People Are Saying: The New Conspiracism and the Assault on Democracy by Russell Muirhead and Nancy L. Rosenblum (review) Conspiracy Theories and Latin American History: Lurking in the Shadows by Luis Roniger and Leonardo Senkman (review) Perennial Conspiracy Theory: Reflections on the History of "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" by Michael Hagemeister (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1