The Elasticity and Capaciousness of Classics

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW Pub Date : 2023-11-29 DOI:10.1353/abr.2023.a913409
Barbara K. Gold
{"title":"The Elasticity and Capaciousness of Classics","authors":"Barbara K. Gold","doi":"10.1353/abr.2023.a913409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> The Elasticity and Capaciousness of Classics <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Barbara K. Gold (bio) </li> </ul> <p>Perhaps the most amazing thing about Classics/Classical Studies/Greek and Roman Studies (whatever we want to call it—the jury is still out) is its elasticity; its ability—indeed its urgency—to reach out temporally, spatially, materially, semantically, theoretically; its inability to be confined to one theory, one subdiscipline, one approach; and its desire to constantly evolve and to become something else. Classicists in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries would barely recognize what Classics has become, and I suspect that the same will be true of classicists after us in the twenty-fourth and twenty-fifth centuries.</p> <p>Every one of us has our own version of what Classics is, or ought to be. But as confirmed as we might be in our beliefs, those versions change along with our embeddedness in the culture. Classics used to mean philology and the study of Latin and Greek. It was heavily based in textual work, and any analysis of those texts was historical or philological. The American Philological Association was the major North American Classics organization for many years until it changed its name in 2014 to the Society for Classical Studies, a nod to the effort to broaden the scope and appeal of Classical Studies.</p> <p>I am going to engage in a brief autobiography here to show how much Classics has changed for me at least since I started studying it back in the 1960s and 1970s. I read my way through all the major (and some minor) Greek and Roman authors with little sense of asking any of the questions I would start with today (or of being allowed to ask such questions. One friend told me that when she tried to bring up a possible reference to rape in Greek tragedy, she was shut down). I realized after graduate school that I had taken courses in Greek tragedy without anyone highlighting the role of women. How is that possible? I read Roman satire without really thinking much about sexuality in satire. I read the elegists without thinking about the role of desire and the erotic in Propertius and Ovid. I did not read any literature from late antiquity, medieval times, or Christianity. While I got what was, I suppose, a good education in the basics, I realized later that what interests me <strong>[End Page 33]</strong> most now about these authors, texts, and cultural moments was almost entirely left out of my early connection with the classical world.</p> <p>Things began to change in the 1970s (at least for me), largely because of the founding of the Women's Classical Caucus in 1972 (fifty years ago) and the increased presence of bright, powerful women who paved the way for the exciting feminist scholarship that began to see the light. Journals like <em>Helios</em> and <em>Arethusa</em> were publishing nontraditional articles that tended toward the feminist and theoretical; now <em>Eugesta</em> is doing much of that work internationally. And in 1992 the triennial Feminism and Classics conferences began (the eighth was held in 2022). My research went from books and articles on patronage (sociohistorical but not feminist or theoretical) to publications on feminist theory, women as patrons, books and articles on female figures and writers, sex and gender, and most recently work on transgender saints and enslaved martyrs in medieval and Byzantine times.</p> <p>This is just one person's evolution. But to see how much Classics has really changed and how expansive its canopy has become, one need only look at the emails that arrive every day with notices of conferences, talks, and volumes with and for people all over the world (COVID-19 and the advent of Zooming has had a lot to do with the inclusion of so many different people able to be present at these events). Here is a snapshot in the winter of 2022 of what Classics has become, is now, and could be. A leading university has advertised its PhD program to potential applicants. Their offerings and specialties include (in addition to languages, literature, culture, history, art, and archaeology) the ancient scientific imagination, neo-Latin and reception studies, queer theory and the history of sexuality, race and racialization in...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":41337,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/abr.2023.a913409","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • The Elasticity and Capaciousness of Classics
  • Barbara K. Gold (bio)

Perhaps the most amazing thing about Classics/Classical Studies/Greek and Roman Studies (whatever we want to call it—the jury is still out) is its elasticity; its ability—indeed its urgency—to reach out temporally, spatially, materially, semantically, theoretically; its inability to be confined to one theory, one subdiscipline, one approach; and its desire to constantly evolve and to become something else. Classicists in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries would barely recognize what Classics has become, and I suspect that the same will be true of classicists after us in the twenty-fourth and twenty-fifth centuries.

Every one of us has our own version of what Classics is, or ought to be. But as confirmed as we might be in our beliefs, those versions change along with our embeddedness in the culture. Classics used to mean philology and the study of Latin and Greek. It was heavily based in textual work, and any analysis of those texts was historical or philological. The American Philological Association was the major North American Classics organization for many years until it changed its name in 2014 to the Society for Classical Studies, a nod to the effort to broaden the scope and appeal of Classical Studies.

I am going to engage in a brief autobiography here to show how much Classics has changed for me at least since I started studying it back in the 1960s and 1970s. I read my way through all the major (and some minor) Greek and Roman authors with little sense of asking any of the questions I would start with today (or of being allowed to ask such questions. One friend told me that when she tried to bring up a possible reference to rape in Greek tragedy, she was shut down). I realized after graduate school that I had taken courses in Greek tragedy without anyone highlighting the role of women. How is that possible? I read Roman satire without really thinking much about sexuality in satire. I read the elegists without thinking about the role of desire and the erotic in Propertius and Ovid. I did not read any literature from late antiquity, medieval times, or Christianity. While I got what was, I suppose, a good education in the basics, I realized later that what interests me [End Page 33] most now about these authors, texts, and cultural moments was almost entirely left out of my early connection with the classical world.

Things began to change in the 1970s (at least for me), largely because of the founding of the Women's Classical Caucus in 1972 (fifty years ago) and the increased presence of bright, powerful women who paved the way for the exciting feminist scholarship that began to see the light. Journals like Helios and Arethusa were publishing nontraditional articles that tended toward the feminist and theoretical; now Eugesta is doing much of that work internationally. And in 1992 the triennial Feminism and Classics conferences began (the eighth was held in 2022). My research went from books and articles on patronage (sociohistorical but not feminist or theoretical) to publications on feminist theory, women as patrons, books and articles on female figures and writers, sex and gender, and most recently work on transgender saints and enslaved martyrs in medieval and Byzantine times.

This is just one person's evolution. But to see how much Classics has really changed and how expansive its canopy has become, one need only look at the emails that arrive every day with notices of conferences, talks, and volumes with and for people all over the world (COVID-19 and the advent of Zooming has had a lot to do with the inclusion of so many different people able to be present at these events). Here is a snapshot in the winter of 2022 of what Classics has become, is now, and could be. A leading university has advertised its PhD program to potential applicants. Their offerings and specialties include (in addition to languages, literature, culture, history, art, and archaeology) the ancient scientific imagination, neo-Latin and reception studies, queer theory and the history of sexuality, race and racialization in...

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经典的弹性与容忍度
代替摘要,这里有一个简短的内容摘录:经典的弹性和容量芭芭拉K.戈尔德(传记)也许关于古典/古典研究/希腊和罗马研究(无论我们想叫它什么——陪审团还没有出来)最令人惊奇的事情是它的弹性;它在时间、空间、物质、语义和理论方面的能力——实际上是它的紧迫性;它不能局限于一种理论、一门分支学科、一种方法;它渴望不断进化,变成另一种东西。18世纪和19世纪的古典主义者几乎认不出古典文学已经变成了什么,我猜想,在我们之后的24世纪和25世纪,古典主义者也会是这样。我们每个人都有自己的版本的经典是什么,或者应该是什么。但是,就像我们对自己的信仰深信不疑一样,这些观点也会随着我们在文化中的嵌入程度而改变。古典文学过去指的是文献学和对拉丁语和希腊语的研究。它在很大程度上基于文本工作,对这些文本的任何分析都是历史的或语言学的。美国文献学协会(American Philological Association)多年来一直是北美主要的古典学组织,直到2014年更名为古典学学会(Society for Classical Studies),这是对拓宽古典学范围和吸引力的努力的认可。我要在这里写一篇简短的自传,来展示至少从我上世纪六七十年代开始学习古典文学以来,它对我的影响有多大。我通读了所有主要的(和一些次要的)希腊和罗马作家的作品,却没有意识到我今天一开始要问的任何问题(或者被允许问这样的问题)。一位朋友告诉我,当她试图提到希腊悲剧中可能出现的强奸时,她被拒绝了。研究生毕业后,我意识到我上过希腊悲剧的课程,但没有人强调女性的角色。这怎么可能呢?我读罗马讽刺作品时,并没有认真思考讽刺作品中的性。我读挽歌时没有考虑到普罗提乌斯和奥维德的欲望和情色的作用。我没有读过任何古代晚期、中世纪或基督教的文学作品。虽然我认为我得到了良好的基础教育,但后来我意识到,现在我对这些作者、文本和文化时刻最感兴趣的东西,几乎完全被我早期与古典世界的联系所忽略了。20世纪70年代,情况开始发生变化(至少对我来说是这样),主要是因为1972年(50年前)女性经典党团会议(Women’s Classical Caucus)的成立,以及越来越多聪明、有权势的女性的出现,为令人兴奋的女权主义学术研究铺平了道路。《Helios》和《Arethusa》等期刊发表了一些非传统的文章,倾向于女权主义和理论;现在Eugesta在国际上做了很多这样的工作。1992年,三年一次的女权主义和经典会议开始了(第八届于2022年举行)。我的研究从关于赞助的书籍和文章(社会历史的,但不是女权主义或理论的)到女权主义理论、女性作为赞助人、关于女性人物和作家、性和性别的书籍和文章的出版物,以及最近关于中世纪和拜占庭时期变性圣徒和被奴役的烈士的工作。这只是一个人的进化。但是,要了解Classics真正发生了多大的变化,以及它的树冠已经变得多么广阔,人们只需要看看每天收到的电子邮件,里面有世界各地的人参加的会议、会谈和书籍的通知(COVID-19和zoom的出现与许多不同的人能够参加这些活动有很大关系)。这是2022年冬天的一张快照,展示了经典音乐已经变成了什么,现在是什么,以及可能会变成什么。一所著名大学向潜在申请者做了博士课程的广告。他们的课程和专长包括(除了语言、文学、文化、历史、艺术和考古)古代科学想象、新拉丁语和接受研究、酷儿理论和性的历史、种族和种族化……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW
AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW LITERATURE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
It's the Algorithm, Stupid! Conspiracy Theories in the Time of Covid-19 by Clare Birchall and Peter Knight (review) A Lot of People Are Saying: The New Conspiracism and the Assault on Democracy by Russell Muirhead and Nancy L. Rosenblum (review) Conspiracy Theories and Latin American History: Lurking in the Shadows by Luis Roniger and Leonardo Senkman (review) Perennial Conspiracy Theory: Reflections on the History of "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" by Michael Hagemeister (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1