Phrasing the Yugoslav Crisis: Jovan Mirić and the Constitutional Debates of the 1980s

IF 0.2 Q2 HISTORY East Central Europe Pub Date : 2021-11-26 DOI:10.30965/18763308-48020006
Agustin Cosovschi
{"title":"Phrasing the Yugoslav Crisis: Jovan Mirić and the Constitutional Debates of the 1980s","authors":"Agustin Cosovschi","doi":"10.30965/18763308-48020006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this article, I analyze the debate triggered in Yugoslavia in 1984 by Jovan Mirić’s book <em>The System and the Crisis</em>. Drawing from a wide corpus of sources, mainly from the Yugoslav press and the intellectual production of the time, I argue that the episode sheds light on many aspects of the Yugoslav crisis. First, it shows the ultimate incapacity of certain actors of the Yugoslav political and intellectual elite to accept a compromise with those who pushed for reform. Second, the episode attests to the changes introduced by the crisis on the Yugoslav political and intellectual landscape, which allowed for an intellectual with no political prominence to attain unexpected influence over party politics overnight. Finally, I also argue that the Mirić affair shows that many in the Yugoslav political and intellectual world who could not be identified as nationalists were nevertheless anxious about the way in which authorities were dealing with the Serbian question, which invites us to leave aside black-and-white notions when considering the power of Serbian nationalism and its rise during the 1980s.</p>","PeriodicalId":40651,"journal":{"name":"East Central Europe","volume":"24 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East Central Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30965/18763308-48020006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, I analyze the debate triggered in Yugoslavia in 1984 by Jovan Mirić’s book The System and the Crisis. Drawing from a wide corpus of sources, mainly from the Yugoslav press and the intellectual production of the time, I argue that the episode sheds light on many aspects of the Yugoslav crisis. First, it shows the ultimate incapacity of certain actors of the Yugoslav political and intellectual elite to accept a compromise with those who pushed for reform. Second, the episode attests to the changes introduced by the crisis on the Yugoslav political and intellectual landscape, which allowed for an intellectual with no political prominence to attain unexpected influence over party politics overnight. Finally, I also argue that the Mirić affair shows that many in the Yugoslav political and intellectual world who could not be identified as nationalists were nevertheless anxious about the way in which authorities were dealing with the Serbian question, which invites us to leave aside black-and-white notions when considering the power of Serbian nationalism and its rise during the 1980s.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南斯拉夫危机的措辞:约万·米里奇和1980年代的宪法辩论
在本文中,我分析了1984年约万·米里奇的著作《制度与危机》在南斯拉夫引发的争论。从广泛的资料来源,主要来自南斯拉夫的新闻界和当时的知识生产,我认为这一事件揭示了南斯拉夫危机的许多方面。首先,它表明南斯拉夫政治和知识精英中的某些角色最终没有能力接受与那些推动改革的人妥协。第二,这一事件证明了危机给南斯拉夫的政治和知识领域带来的变化,这使得一个没有政治声望的知识分子一夜之间对政党政治产生了意想不到的影响。最后,我还认为,米里奇事件表明,在南斯拉夫的政治和知识界,许多不能被认定为民族主义者的人,仍然对当局处理塞尔维亚问题的方式感到焦虑,这让我们在考虑塞尔维亚民族主义的力量及其在20世纪80年代的崛起时,把黑白分明的观念放在一边。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Liberation, Resettlement, and Looting in Postwar Memoirs from Poland Unmaking Détente: Yugoslavia, the United States, and the Global Cold War, 1968–1980, written by Lazic, Milorad The Postsocialist Contemporary: The Institutionalization of Artistic Practice in Eastern Europe after 1989, written by Octavian, Esanu Empty Signs, Historical Imaginaries: The Entangled Nationalization of Names and Naming in a Late Habsburg Borderland, written by Ágoston, Berecz List of Peer-Reviewers of Volume 47 (2020)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1