Multiple attribute decision-making method based on projection model for dual hesitant fuzzy set

IF 4.8 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making Pub Date : 2021-07-16 DOI:10.1007/s10700-021-09366-9
Yan Ni, Hua Zhao, Zeshui Xu, Zeyan Wang
{"title":"Multiple attribute decision-making method based on projection model for dual hesitant fuzzy set","authors":"Yan Ni, Hua Zhao, Zeshui Xu, Zeyan Wang","doi":"10.1007/s10700-021-09366-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the decision-making process, retaining the original data information has become a most crucial step. Dual hesitant fuzzy sets (DHFS), which can reflect the original membership degree and non-membership degree information given by the DMs, is a kind of new tool for the DMs to provide the original information as much as possible. In this paper, we focus on the decision- making problem by a projection model (Algorithm I) whose attribute values are given in the forms of dual hesitant fuzzy elements (DHFEs). In order to reflect the information of the data more accurately, we first divide the dual hesitant fuzzy decision matrix into membership degree matrix and non-membership degree matrix. Then we gain the virtual positive ideal solution from the membership degree matrix and the negative positive ideal solution from the non-membership degree matrix. And then the projection values from every solution to the virtual positive ideal solution and the negative positive ideal solution are calculated. In combination with the two projection values, the relative consistent degree is further calculated to rank all the alternatives. At the same time, in order to guarantee the rationality of the decision-making result, a variation coefficient method is developed to determine the weights of the attributes under dual hesitant fuzzy environment objectively. Finally, the existing algorithms (Algorithm II and Algorithm III, Algorithm IV, Algorithm V) are compared with our algorithm (Algorithm I). The comparison result shows that Algorithm I is a valuable tool for decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":55131,"journal":{"name":"Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making","volume":"21 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-021-09366-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

In the decision-making process, retaining the original data information has become a most crucial step. Dual hesitant fuzzy sets (DHFS), which can reflect the original membership degree and non-membership degree information given by the DMs, is a kind of new tool for the DMs to provide the original information as much as possible. In this paper, we focus on the decision- making problem by a projection model (Algorithm I) whose attribute values are given in the forms of dual hesitant fuzzy elements (DHFEs). In order to reflect the information of the data more accurately, we first divide the dual hesitant fuzzy decision matrix into membership degree matrix and non-membership degree matrix. Then we gain the virtual positive ideal solution from the membership degree matrix and the negative positive ideal solution from the non-membership degree matrix. And then the projection values from every solution to the virtual positive ideal solution and the negative positive ideal solution are calculated. In combination with the two projection values, the relative consistent degree is further calculated to rank all the alternatives. At the same time, in order to guarantee the rationality of the decision-making result, a variation coefficient method is developed to determine the weights of the attributes under dual hesitant fuzzy environment objectively. Finally, the existing algorithms (Algorithm II and Algorithm III, Algorithm IV, Algorithm V) are compared with our algorithm (Algorithm I). The comparison result shows that Algorithm I is a valuable tool for decision making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于投影模型的双犹豫模糊集多属性决策方法
在决策过程中,保留原始数据信息已成为最关键的一步。对偶犹豫模糊集(Dual犹豫fuzzy sets, DHFS)能够反映决策模型给出的原始隶属度和非隶属度信息,是决策模型尽可能多地提供原始信息的一种新工具。本文主要研究一种投影模型(算法1)的决策问题,该模型的属性值以双犹豫模糊元(DHFEs)形式给出。为了更准确地反映数据信息,我们首先将二元犹豫模糊决策矩阵分为隶属度矩阵和非隶属度矩阵。然后由隶属度矩阵得到虚正理想解,由非隶属度矩阵得到负正理想解。然后计算每个解到虚正理想解和负正理想解的投影值。结合两个投影值,进一步计算相对一致度,对所有备选方案进行排序。同时,为了保证决策结果的合理性,提出了一种变差系数法来客观确定双犹豫模糊环境下各属性的权重。最后,将现有算法(算法II、算法III、算法IV、算法V)与我们的算法(算法I)进行比较,结果表明算法I是一种有价值的决策工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making
Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
10.60%
发文量
27
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The key objective of Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making is to promote research and the development of fuzzy technology and soft-computing methodologies to enhance our ability to address complicated optimization and decision making problems involving non-probabilitic uncertainty. The journal will cover all aspects of employing fuzzy technologies to see optimal solutions and assist in making the best possible decisions. It will provide a global forum for advancing the state-of-the-art theory and practice of fuzzy optimization and decision making in the presence of uncertainty. Any theoretical, empirical, and experimental work related to fuzzy modeling and associated mathematics, solution methods, and systems is welcome. The goal is to help foster the understanding, development, and practice of fuzzy technologies for solving economic, engineering, management, and societal problems. The journal will provide a forum for authors and readers in the fields of business, economics, engineering, mathematics, management science, operations research, and systems.
期刊最新文献
Portfolio selection with second order uncertain dominance constraint Valuation of convertible bond based on uncertain fractional differential equation China’s carbon emission allowance prices forecasting and option designing in uncertain environment Are the queueing systems in practice random or uncertain? Evidence from online car-hailing data in Beijing Modeling of linear uncertain portfolio selection with uncertain constraint and risk index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1