Visual Appropriation: A Self-reflexive Qualitative Method for Visual Analysis of the International

IF 3.5 2区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS International Political Sociology Pub Date : 2021-12-22 DOI:10.1093/ips/olab029
Frank Möller, Rasmus Bellmer, Rune Saugmann
{"title":"Visual Appropriation: A Self-reflexive Qualitative Method for Visual Analysis of the International","authors":"Frank Möller, Rasmus Bellmer, Rune Saugmann","doi":"10.1093/ips/olab029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article introduces visual appropriation as a method in critical international political thinking and acting, contributing to the evolving repertoire of multiple, pluralist methods for visual analysis of international relations operating in a digital visual environment. We define appropriation as reuse of existing visual material—either in its entirety or in part—without substantially altering the immanent characteristics of the appropriated material. As appropriators, scholars are producers of images who capitalize on and actively participate in digital visuality (seeing–changing–sharing). Appropriators are both image-analysts and image-actors but distinct from both, contributing not only to the visual analysis, but also to the visual construction of international relations. Approaching the international through appropriation grants researchers increased agency and responsibility vis-à-vis existing visual materials “out-there.” Rather than exploring a digital space of visual images produced and appropriated by others, researchers consciously and deliberately partake in the production and dissemination of images. As a result, we highlight how we—as scholars and as citizens—are facing research-ethical problematiques linked to ways of showing and seeing inevitably emanating from appropriation.","PeriodicalId":47361,"journal":{"name":"International Political Sociology","volume":"76 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Political Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olab029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article introduces visual appropriation as a method in critical international political thinking and acting, contributing to the evolving repertoire of multiple, pluralist methods for visual analysis of international relations operating in a digital visual environment. We define appropriation as reuse of existing visual material—either in its entirety or in part—without substantially altering the immanent characteristics of the appropriated material. As appropriators, scholars are producers of images who capitalize on and actively participate in digital visuality (seeing–changing–sharing). Appropriators are both image-analysts and image-actors but distinct from both, contributing not only to the visual analysis, but also to the visual construction of international relations. Approaching the international through appropriation grants researchers increased agency and responsibility vis-à-vis existing visual materials “out-there.” Rather than exploring a digital space of visual images produced and appropriated by others, researchers consciously and deliberately partake in the production and dissemination of images. As a result, we highlight how we—as scholars and as citizens—are facing research-ethical problematiques linked to ways of showing and seeing inevitably emanating from appropriation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视觉挪用:国际视觉分析的自反定性方法
本文介绍了视觉挪用作为批判性国际政治思维和行动的一种方法,有助于在数字视觉环境中对国际关系进行视觉分析的多种多元化方法的不断发展。我们将挪用定义为对现有视觉材料的再利用——无论是整体还是部分——而不实质性地改变被挪用材料的内在特征。作为占有者,学者是利用并积极参与数字视觉(观看-改变-分享)的图像生产者。挪用者既是形象分析者又是形象行动者,但两者又有所区别,他们不仅对国际关系的视觉分析有贡献,而且对国际关系的视觉建构也有贡献。通过拨款接近国际,研究人员增加了对-à-vis现有视觉材料“在那里”的代理和责任。研究人员不是探索一个由他人生产和占有的视觉图像的数字空间,而是有意识地参与图像的生产和传播。因此,我们强调,作为学者和公民,我们是如何面对研究伦理问题的,这些问题与展示和观察的方式有关,不可避免地源于挪用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: International Political Sociology (IPS), responds to the need for more productive collaboration among political sociologists, international relations specialists and sociopolitical theorists. It is especially concerned with challenges arising from contemporary transformations of social, political, and global orders given the statist forms of traditional sociologies and the marginalization of social processes in many approaches to international relations. IPS is committed to theoretical innovation, new modes of empirical research and the geographical and cultural diversification of research beyond the usual circuits of European and North-American scholarship.
期刊最新文献
Secession or Sense of Belonging? Marginalization in the Context of Transnationality Bio/Necropolitical Capture and Evasion on Africa–Europe Migrant Journeys Justice “to Come”? Decolonial Deconstruction, from Postmodern Policymaking to the Black Horizon “I Flip, Therefore I Am”: Smartphone Detoxing as a Practice of Sovereignty Nomads’ Land: Exploring the Social and Political Life of the Nomad Category
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1