Comparative Analysis of Resolution of Nonparametric BDS Criterion and Maximum Likelihood Criterion for Estimation of Delay and Doppler Frequency Shift of Pulse Signal

Pavlo Yu. Kostenko, Valeriy V. Slobodyanuk, H. Yu. Dukin
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Resolution of Nonparametric BDS Criterion and Maximum Likelihood Criterion for Estimation of Delay and Doppler Frequency Shift of Pulse Signal","authors":"Pavlo Yu. Kostenko, Valeriy V. Slobodyanuk, H. Yu. Dukin","doi":"10.3103/s0735272722120081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>The paper considers a potential resolution of BDS criterion that is used as a goal function in solving the problem of Doppler frequency estimation and the delay of a wideband phase-shift keying pulse signal. For the purpose of investigating the BDS criterion characteristics, BDS-criterion is compared with the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion. A comparative analysis is conducted using the sensitivity function (SF) of BDS criterion and the wideband ambiguity function (WAF) of BPSK signals that make it possible to determine the potential resolution of the methods under consideration. The results of numerical simulation of SF characteristics for BPSK signal were conducted for the cases of presence and absence of noise in observation. The resolution of above criteria was analyzed both with due regard for the signal carrier frequency and in terms of its complex envelope. It was shown that in solving the problem of Doppler frequency estimation and the delay of BPSK signal, the resolution of BDS criterion can be enhanced by taking into account the carrier frequency. The comparative analysis of the resolution of selected criteria depending on the level of additive Gaussian noise in observation was also conducted. It was shown that at low noise levels the potential resolution of BDS criterion is higher than that of ML criterion.</p>","PeriodicalId":52470,"journal":{"name":"Radioelectronics and Communications Systems","volume":"23 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radioelectronics and Communications Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3103/s0735272722120081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper considers a potential resolution of BDS criterion that is used as a goal function in solving the problem of Doppler frequency estimation and the delay of a wideband phase-shift keying pulse signal. For the purpose of investigating the BDS criterion characteristics, BDS-criterion is compared with the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion. A comparative analysis is conducted using the sensitivity function (SF) of BDS criterion and the wideband ambiguity function (WAF) of BPSK signals that make it possible to determine the potential resolution of the methods under consideration. The results of numerical simulation of SF characteristics for BPSK signal were conducted for the cases of presence and absence of noise in observation. The resolution of above criteria was analyzed both with due regard for the signal carrier frequency and in terms of its complex envelope. It was shown that in solving the problem of Doppler frequency estimation and the delay of BPSK signal, the resolution of BDS criterion can be enhanced by taking into account the carrier frequency. The comparative analysis of the resolution of selected criteria depending on the level of additive Gaussian noise in observation was also conducted. It was shown that at low noise levels the potential resolution of BDS criterion is higher than that of ML criterion.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脉冲信号时延和多普勒频移估计的非参数BDS准则和最大似然准则的分辨率比较分析
摘要本文考虑了一种潜在分辨率的北斗准则,并将其作为目标函数用于解决宽带相移键控脉冲信号的多普勒频率估计和时延问题。为了研究北斗准则的特征,将北斗准则与最大似然准则进行了比较。利用BDS准则的灵敏度函数(SF)和BPSK信号的宽带模糊函数(WAF)进行了比较分析,从而可以确定所考虑的方法的潜在分辨率。对观测中有无噪声情况下BPSK信号的顺波特性进行了数值模拟。对上述标准的分辨率进行了分析,同时考虑了信号的载波频率和其复杂包络。研究表明,在解决多普勒频率估计和BPSK信号延迟问题时,考虑载波频率可以提高北斗准则的分辨率。根据观测中加性高斯噪声的大小,对所选判据的分辨率进行了比较分析。结果表明,在低噪声水平下,BDS判据的潜在分辨率高于ML判据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radioelectronics and Communications Systems
Radioelectronics and Communications Systems Engineering-Electrical and Electronic Engineering
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: Radioelectronics and Communications Systems  covers urgent theoretical problems of radio-engineering; results of research efforts, leading experience, which determines directions and development of scientific research in radio engineering and radio electronics; publishes materials of scientific conferences and meetings; information on scientific work in higher educational institutions; newsreel and bibliographic materials. Journal publishes articles in the following sections:Antenna-feeding and microwave devices;Vacuum and gas-discharge devices;Solid-state electronics and integral circuit engineering;Optical radar, communication and information processing systems;Use of computers for research and design of radio-electronic devices and systems;Quantum electronic devices;Design of radio-electronic devices;Radar and radio navigation;Radio engineering devices and systems;Radio engineering theory;Medical radioelectronics.
期刊最新文献
Investigation of Problems of Electromagnetic Wave Scattering by Conductive Strip Gratings Using Integral Equation Method Optimization of Radiation Characteristics of Linear Focusing Array Consisting of Semitransparent Mirrors Scattering and Absorption of Electromagnetic Radiation with Cylindrical Objects Forced Lateral Vibrations of Magnetically Soft Microribbon: Construction of Partial Solutions NMR-Spin-Echo Study of Pinning of Domain Walls in Cobalt Micropowders, Nanopowders and Nanowires
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1