Preverbal clitic clusters in the Tanzanian Rift Valley revisited

IF 0.4 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Journal of African Languages and Linguistics Pub Date : 2023-11-29 DOI:10.1515/jall-2023-2010
Andrew Harvey, Hannah Gibson, Richard Griscom
{"title":"Preverbal clitic clusters in the Tanzanian Rift Valley revisited","authors":"Andrew Harvey, Hannah Gibson, Richard Griscom","doi":"10.1515/jall-2023-2010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines preverbal clitic clusters in the Tanzanian Rift Valley, an area of high linguistic diversity with representatives of the Bantu, Cushitic, and Nilotic families, as well as Sandawe (possibly a distant member of the Khoi-Kwadi family), and the language isolate Hadza. An earlier work (Kießling, Roland, Maarten Mous &amp; Derek Nurse. 2008. The Tanzanian Rift Valley area. In Bernd Heine &amp; Derek Nurse (eds.), <jats:italic>A linguistic geography of Africa</jats:italic>, 186–227. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) identified preverbal clitic clusters as a widespread feature across many languages of the Rift Valley, and posited the preverbal clitic cluster as a feature characteristic of a ‘Tanzanian Rift Valley Area’. The current paper provides further detail on preverbal clitic clusters across the languages of the region and examines possible routes of development for these structures. From this analysis, the picture that emerges is complex: contact scenarios cannot be restricted to ones in which West Rift Cushitic or its predecessor languages are the only models for the development of a preverbal clitic cluster and, in the case of Sandawe (and perhaps the Datooga varieties), it appears as if the development of a preverbal clitic cluster cannot be linked to contact at all. In terms of what this means for the ‘areality’ of the Tanzanian Rift Valley, this paper forgoes discussions about geographical delineation or arguments for or against a ‘Tanzanian Rift Valley Area’ in favour of highlighting the individual historical events (c.f. Campbell, Lyle. 2017. Why is it so hard to define a linguistic area? In Raymond Hickey (ed.), <jats:italic>The Cambridge handbook of areal linguistics</jats:italic>, 19–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) that may have given rise to preverbal clitic clusters in the languages of our sample, as well as encouraging continued investigation into the nature of these histories, both from a linguistic and interdisciplinary perspective.","PeriodicalId":43215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of African Languages and Linguistics","volume":"96 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of African Languages and Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jall-2023-2010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines preverbal clitic clusters in the Tanzanian Rift Valley, an area of high linguistic diversity with representatives of the Bantu, Cushitic, and Nilotic families, as well as Sandawe (possibly a distant member of the Khoi-Kwadi family), and the language isolate Hadza. An earlier work (Kießling, Roland, Maarten Mous & Derek Nurse. 2008. The Tanzanian Rift Valley area. In Bernd Heine & Derek Nurse (eds.), A linguistic geography of Africa, 186–227. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) identified preverbal clitic clusters as a widespread feature across many languages of the Rift Valley, and posited the preverbal clitic cluster as a feature characteristic of a ‘Tanzanian Rift Valley Area’. The current paper provides further detail on preverbal clitic clusters across the languages of the region and examines possible routes of development for these structures. From this analysis, the picture that emerges is complex: contact scenarios cannot be restricted to ones in which West Rift Cushitic or its predecessor languages are the only models for the development of a preverbal clitic cluster and, in the case of Sandawe (and perhaps the Datooga varieties), it appears as if the development of a preverbal clitic cluster cannot be linked to contact at all. In terms of what this means for the ‘areality’ of the Tanzanian Rift Valley, this paper forgoes discussions about geographical delineation or arguments for or against a ‘Tanzanian Rift Valley Area’ in favour of highlighting the individual historical events (c.f. Campbell, Lyle. 2017. Why is it so hard to define a linguistic area? In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of areal linguistics, 19–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) that may have given rise to preverbal clitic clusters in the languages of our sample, as well as encouraging continued investigation into the nature of these histories, both from a linguistic and interdisciplinary perspective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
坦桑尼亚大裂谷的口前气候集群再次出现
本文研究了坦桑尼亚大裂谷的前语言clitic集群,这是一个高度语言多样性的地区,有班图人、库希特人和尼罗河人家族的代表,以及桑达维人(可能是科伊-夸迪家族的远亲),以及孤立的哈扎语。早期作品(Kießling, Roland, Maarten Mous &德里克·纳斯,2008。坦桑尼亚大裂谷地区。在Bernd Heine &;戴瑞克·纳斯主编,《非洲语言地理学》,186-227页。剑桥:剑桥大学出版社)将言语前的clitic集群确定为裂谷许多语言的普遍特征,并将言语前的clitic集群定位为“坦桑尼亚裂谷地区”的特征。目前的论文提供了跨区域语言的言语前clitic集群的进一步细节,并研究了这些结构的可能发展路线。从这个分析中,出现的画面是复杂的:接触场景不能局限于西裂谷缓冲语或其前身语言是发展前语言clitic集群的唯一模式,在Sandawe(也许还有Datooga变种)的情况下,似乎前语言clitic集群的发展根本不能与接触联系在一起。就这对坦桑尼亚大裂谷的“现实”意味着什么而言,本文放弃了关于地理划分的讨论或支持或反对“坦桑尼亚大裂谷地区”的论据,转而强调个别历史事件(c.f. Campbell, Lyle. 2017)。为什么定义一个语言区域如此困难?在雷蒙德·希基(编),区域语言学的剑桥手册,19-39。剑桥:剑桥大学出版社),这可能会在我们的样本语言中产生言语前的clitic集群,并鼓励从语言学和跨学科的角度继续研究这些历史的本质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: The Journal of African Languages and Linguistics was founded in 1979 and has established itself as an important refereed forum for publications in African linguistics. The Journal of African Languages and Linguistics welcomes original contributions on all aspects of African language studies, synchronic as well as diachronic, theoretical as well as data-oriented. The journal further contains a list of recently published books on African languages and linguistics, which many libraries find to be of use for the acquisition of books. The Journal of African Languages and Linguistics is a peer-reviewed journal of international scope.
期刊最新文献
On the grammaticalization of ġādi in Moroccan Arabic: new insights A diachronic perspective on ‘prosodies’ in Central Chadic languages (Afroasiatic) Resuming topics and foci: Anyi, Baule and microvariation in Kwa languages Tone and clause structure in Bùlì The Wolof argument-focus constructions as copulaless clefts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1