Litigation and Selection with Correlated Two-Sided Incomplete Information

IF 1 3区 社会学 Q3 ECONOMICS American Law and Economics Review Pub Date : 2018-10-01 DOI:10.1093/aler/ahy005
Daniel Klerman, Yoon-Ho Alex Lee, Lawrence Liu
{"title":"Litigation and Selection with Correlated Two-Sided Incomplete Information","authors":"Daniel Klerman, Yoon-Ho Alex Lee, Lawrence Liu","doi":"10.1093/aler/ahy005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the selection of disputes for litigation in a setting with two-sided incomplete information and correlated signals. The models analyzed here suggest that Priest and Klein’s conclusion that close cases are more likely to go to trial than extreme cases remains largely valid when their model is interpreted as involving correlated, two-sided incomplete information and is updated (i) to incorporate take-it-or-leave-it offers or the Chatterjee–Samuelson mechanism, (ii) to take into account the credibility of the plaintiff’s threat to go to trial, and (iii) to allow parties to make sophisticated, Bayesian inferences based on knowledge of the distribution of disputes. On the other hand, Priest and Klein’s prediction that the plaintiff will win 50% of litigated cases is sensitive to bargaining and parameter assumptions.","PeriodicalId":46133,"journal":{"name":"American Law and Economics Review","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Law and Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahy005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores the selection of disputes for litigation in a setting with two-sided incomplete information and correlated signals. The models analyzed here suggest that Priest and Klein’s conclusion that close cases are more likely to go to trial than extreme cases remains largely valid when their model is interpreted as involving correlated, two-sided incomplete information and is updated (i) to incorporate take-it-or-leave-it offers or the Chatterjee–Samuelson mechanism, (ii) to take into account the credibility of the plaintiff’s threat to go to trial, and (iii) to allow parties to make sophisticated, Bayesian inferences based on knowledge of the distribution of disputes. On the other hand, Priest and Klein’s prediction that the plaintiff will win 50% of litigated cases is sensitive to bargaining and parameter assumptions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于相关双边不完全信息的诉讼与选择
本文探讨了在双边信息不完全和相关信号条件下诉讼纠纷的选择问题。本文分析的模型表明,普雷斯特和克莱因的结论,即接近的案件比极端的案件更有可能进行审判,当他们的模型被解释为涉及相关的双边不完整信息,并进行更新(i)纳入接受或放弃的提议或查特吉-萨缪尔森机制,(ii)考虑到原告进行审判的威胁的可信度,以及(iii)允许当事人做出复杂的,基于争议分布知识的贝叶斯推理。另一方面,普里斯特和克莱因预测原告将赢得50%的诉讼案件,这一预测对讨价还价和参数假设很敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The rise of the field of law and economics has been extremely rapid over the last 25 years. Among important developments of the 1990s has been the founding of the American Law and Economics Association. The creation and rapid expansion of the ALEA and the creation of parallel associations in Europe, Latin America, and Canada attest to the growing acceptance of the economic perspective on law by judges, practitioners, and policy-makers.
期刊最新文献
Biased Mediators in Conflict Resolution Present Bias and Debt-Financed Durable Goods Continuances and Uncertainty in the Course of Adjudication More Talk, Less Conflict: Evidence from Requiring Informal Discovery Conferences Does the Fundamental Transformation Deter Trade? An Experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1