Numerical and experimental evaluation of the hydrodynamics in a tubular swirling flow reactor and its comparison with the mixing regime of a stirred dark fermenter†

IF 3.4 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Reaction Chemistry & Engineering Pub Date : 2023-11-24 DOI:10.1039/D3RE00441D
H. O. Mendez-Acosta, J. T. López-Maldonado, A. D. Villalobos-Lara, A. Flores-Rangel and F. F. Rivera
{"title":"Numerical and experimental evaluation of the hydrodynamics in a tubular swirling flow reactor and its comparison with the mixing regime of a stirred dark fermenter†","authors":"H. O. Mendez-Acosta, J. T. López-Maldonado, A. D. Villalobos-Lara, A. Flores-Rangel and F. F. Rivera","doi":"10.1039/D3RE00441D","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >This work aims to the computational fluid dynamics study and experimental evaluation of hydrodynamics and back-mixing of a homemade tubular swirling flow reactor intended to be used as an anaerobic dark fermenter (where an adequate mixing regime is needed to decrease H<small><sub>2</sub></small> supersaturation in the system to enhance its production) and its comparison with a classical CSTR typically used for such process, considering a single phase. Simulation and experimental results on the CSTR reactor indicate that the mixing pattern relies on the reactor design and stirring conditions. Meanwhile, for the TSFR reactor, hydrodynamic conditions and inlet design are critical for the formation of swirl flow patterns and consequently for the improvement of mixing grade. Simulation studies show that the tangential inlet system proposed as a key design parameter provokes a distribution of velocity magnitude that favors the formation of vortexes inside of volume in both reactors. This study shows that the methodology carried out to compare the mixing performance of both reactors evidenced that the use of TSFR as a fermenter could represent a technological advantage since flow tubular reactors generally require a simpler design, cheap maintenance, and low energy requirements than the CSTR reactors.</p>","PeriodicalId":101,"journal":{"name":"Reaction Chemistry & Engineering","volume":" 3","pages":" 594-603"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reaction Chemistry & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/re/d3re00441d","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work aims to the computational fluid dynamics study and experimental evaluation of hydrodynamics and back-mixing of a homemade tubular swirling flow reactor intended to be used as an anaerobic dark fermenter (where an adequate mixing regime is needed to decrease H2 supersaturation in the system to enhance its production) and its comparison with a classical CSTR typically used for such process, considering a single phase. Simulation and experimental results on the CSTR reactor indicate that the mixing pattern relies on the reactor design and stirring conditions. Meanwhile, for the TSFR reactor, hydrodynamic conditions and inlet design are critical for the formation of swirl flow patterns and consequently for the improvement of mixing grade. Simulation studies show that the tangential inlet system proposed as a key design parameter provokes a distribution of velocity magnitude that favors the formation of vortexes inside of volume in both reactors. This study shows that the methodology carried out to compare the mixing performance of both reactors evidenced that the use of TSFR as a fermenter could represent a technological advantage since flow tubular reactors generally require a simpler design, cheap maintenance, and low energy requirements than the CSTR reactors.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
管状旋流反应器流体力学的数值与实验评价及其与搅拌暗发酵罐混合状态的比较
本研究旨在对自制管状旋流反应器进行计算流体动力学研究,并对其流体动力学和反混合进行实验评估,该反应器将用作厌氧暗发酵(需要适当的混合制度来减少系统中的H2过饱和以提高其产量),并将其与用于该过程的典型CSTR进行比较,考虑单相。CSTR反应器的模拟和实验结果表明,混合模式取决于反应器设计和搅拌条件。同时,对于TSFR反应器而言,流体动力条件和入口设计对漩涡流型的形成和混合等级的提高至关重要。仿真研究表明,作为关键设计参数的切向进气道系统在两个反应器中产生了有利于体积内涡形成的速度量级分布。本研究表明,比较两种反应器混合性能的方法证明,使用TSFR作为发酵罐可能具有技术优势,因为流式管式反应器通常比CSTR反应器需要更简单的设计、更便宜的维护和更低的能源需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reaction Chemistry & Engineering
Reaction Chemistry & Engineering Chemistry-Chemistry (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
227
期刊介绍: Reaction Chemistry & Engineering is a new journal reporting cutting edge research into all aspects of making molecules for the benefit of fundamental research, applied processes and wider society. From fundamental, molecular-level chemistry to large scale chemical production, Reaction Chemistry & Engineering brings together communities of chemists and chemical engineers working to ensure the crucial role of reaction chemistry in today’s world.
期刊最新文献
Back cover Back cover Linear scaling relationships in homogeneous photoredox catalysis† Immobilization of cationic dye on photoluminescent hydroxyapatite particles through a citric acid bonding layer† ChemPren: a new and economical technology for conversion of waste plastics to light olefins
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1