What’s really in a deal? Evidence from textual analysis of M&A conference calls

IF 1.2 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Review of Financial Economics Pub Date : 2021-01-25 DOI:10.1002/rfe.1126
Wenyao Hu, Thomas Shohfi, Runzu Wang
{"title":"What’s really in a deal? Evidence from textual analysis of M&A conference calls","authors":"Wenyao Hu, Thomas Shohfi, Runzu Wang","doi":"10.1002/rfe.1126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using a sample of 814 transcripts from 2011 to 2018, we examine information within merger and acquisition conference calls. Textual analysis reveals significant differences between the content of M&A call transcripts and both contemporaneous corporate press releases and prior earnings conference calls. We find participation of target executive types in M&A calls occurs more frequently in diversifying acquisitions and is related to payment choice consistent with promoting managerial sector-specific skills and incentive alignment, respectively. Retention of participating target executives is associated with a negative market reaction. We also identify a negative relation between textual sentiment and market reaction consistent with a response to higher levels of information asymmetry. Greater quantitative information, however, is positively related to the market reaction of M&A calls. We develop targeted M&A motive dictionaries to identify financial and strategic content within call transcripts. Consistent with prior literature on merger motivation, deals with more finance (strategy)-oriented words have a higher (lower) market reaction. Overall, our results show that deal-related textual analysis explains a highly significant and economically important component of gains/losses to acquirers.","PeriodicalId":51691,"journal":{"name":"Review of Financial Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Financial Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rfe.1126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using a sample of 814 transcripts from 2011 to 2018, we examine information within merger and acquisition conference calls. Textual analysis reveals significant differences between the content of M&A call transcripts and both contemporaneous corporate press releases and prior earnings conference calls. We find participation of target executive types in M&A calls occurs more frequently in diversifying acquisitions and is related to payment choice consistent with promoting managerial sector-specific skills and incentive alignment, respectively. Retention of participating target executives is associated with a negative market reaction. We also identify a negative relation between textual sentiment and market reaction consistent with a response to higher levels of information asymmetry. Greater quantitative information, however, is positively related to the market reaction of M&A calls. We develop targeted M&A motive dictionaries to identify financial and strategic content within call transcripts. Consistent with prior literature on merger motivation, deals with more finance (strategy)-oriented words have a higher (lower) market reaction. Overall, our results show that deal-related textual analysis explains a highly significant and economically important component of gains/losses to acquirers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一笔交易的真正含义是什么?来自并购电话会议文本分析的证据
我们以2011年至2018年的814份电话会议记录为样本,研究了并购电话会议中的信息。文本分析显示,M&A电话会议记录的内容与同期公司新闻稿和先前的收益电话会议之间存在显著差异。我们发现,目标高管类型在并购多元化过程中的参与更为频繁,并且分别与促进管理部门特定技能和激励一致性的支付选择有关。保留参与的目标高管与负面的市场反应有关。我们还确定了文本情绪和市场反应之间的负相关关系,这与对更高水平信息不对称的反应一致。然而,更多的定量信息与M&A要求的市场反应呈正相关。我们开发有针对性的M&A动机词典,以识别电话记录中的财务和战略内容。与先前关于并购动机的文献一致,涉及更多财务(战略)导向词汇的交易具有更高(更低)的市场反应。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,与交易相关的文本分析解释了收购方收益/损失的一个非常重要和经济上重要的组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Financial Economics
Review of Financial Economics BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The scope of the Review of Financial Economics (RFE) is broad. The RFE publishes original research in finance (e.g. corporate finance, investments, financial institutions and international finance) and economics (e.g. monetary theory, fiscal policy, and international economics). It specifically encourages submissions that apply economic principles to financial decision making. For example, while RFE will publish papers which study the behavior of security prices and those which provide analyses of monetary and fiscal policies, it will offer a special forum for articles which examine the impact of macroeconomic factors on the behavior of security prices.
期刊最新文献
Creating value through ESG: Assessing, measuring, and managing risks and opportunities Analyzing the energy markets and financial markets linkage: A bibliometric analysis and future research agenda Stock return predictability and Taylor rules Tobin's Q and shareholder value: Does “shareholder return” impede investment? A rational finance explanation of the stock predictability puzzle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1