How Do Regulatory Focus and the Big Five Relate to Work-domain Risk-taking? Evidence from Resting-state fMRI

IF 3.7 2区 心理学 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Business and Psychology Pub Date : 2023-12-02 DOI:10.1007/s10869-023-09925-4
Zhengqiang Zhong, Han Ren, Song Wang
{"title":"How Do Regulatory Focus and the Big Five Relate to Work-domain Risk-taking? Evidence from Resting-state fMRI","authors":"Zhengqiang Zhong, Han Ren, Song Wang","doi":"10.1007/s10869-023-09925-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Risk-taking in the ‘work’ domain constitutes a fundamental building block for a wide range of important decisions (e.g., investment) and behaviors (e.g., creativity) of individuals, groups, and organizations. Yet, what remains unknown is the neurofunctional basis of work-domain risk-taking (WRT) and how these brain substrates act as mediators in relating individual personality traits such as regulatory focus and the Big Five to WRT. This study, with a sample of 201 healthy full-time employees, investigated the above questions using resting-state fMRI. The results indicated that individuals who engage more in WRT showed increased brain activity (indicated by fALFF) in the right medial frontal gyrus (MFG) and right insula brain areas involved in goal-directed and self-regulated functions, therefore providing unique neuroimaging evidence for the notion that risk-taking is highly domain specific. More importantly, we found that fALFF in the right MFG and right insula areas has a significant mediating role in relating promotion focus and neuroticism to WRT, respectively, suggesting that these traits might have more important roles in associating with WRT, and the brain activity of the two regions (i.e., right MFG and right insula) may act as the underlying mediating mechanisms. Managerial implications are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business and Psychology","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business and Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-023-09925-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Risk-taking in the ‘work’ domain constitutes a fundamental building block for a wide range of important decisions (e.g., investment) and behaviors (e.g., creativity) of individuals, groups, and organizations. Yet, what remains unknown is the neurofunctional basis of work-domain risk-taking (WRT) and how these brain substrates act as mediators in relating individual personality traits such as regulatory focus and the Big Five to WRT. This study, with a sample of 201 healthy full-time employees, investigated the above questions using resting-state fMRI. The results indicated that individuals who engage more in WRT showed increased brain activity (indicated by fALFF) in the right medial frontal gyrus (MFG) and right insula brain areas involved in goal-directed and self-regulated functions, therefore providing unique neuroimaging evidence for the notion that risk-taking is highly domain specific. More importantly, we found that fALFF in the right MFG and right insula areas has a significant mediating role in relating promotion focus and neuroticism to WRT, respectively, suggesting that these traits might have more important roles in associating with WRT, and the brain activity of the two regions (i.e., right MFG and right insula) may act as the underlying mediating mechanisms. Managerial implications are discussed.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
监管重点和五大银行如何与工作领域的风险承担相关?静息状态fMRI证据
“工作”领域的冒险构成了个人、团体和组织的一系列重要决策(例如,投资)和行为(例如,创造力)的基本构建块。然而,工作领域冒险行为(WRT)的神经功能基础,以及这些脑底物如何作为调节焦点和大五人格特征与WRT之间关系的中介,仍然是未知的。本研究以201名健康的全职员工为样本,使用静息状态功能磁共振成像(fMRI)对上述问题进行了调查。结果表明,参与更多WRT的个体在参与目标导向和自我调节功能的右内侧额回(MFG)和右岛脑区域显示出更高的大脑活动(由fALFF指示),因此为冒险行为具有高度领域特异性的概念提供了独特的神经影像学证据。更重要的是,我们发现右侧脑皮层皮层区和右脑岛区的fALFF分别在促进焦点和神经质与WRT的关联中具有显著的中介作用,这表明这些特征可能在WRT的关联中具有更重要的作用,右侧脑皮层区和右脑岛区的脑活动可能是潜在的中介机制。讨论了管理意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business and Psychology (JBP) is an international outlet publishing high quality research designed to advance organizational science and practice. Since its inception in 1986, the journal has published impactful scholarship in Industrial/Organizational Psychology, Organizational Behavior, Human Resources Management, Work Psychology, Occupational Psychology, and Vocational Psychology. Typical subject matters include Team processes and effectiveness Customer service and satisfaction Employee recruitment, selection, and promotion Employee engagement and withdrawal Organizational culture and climate Training, development and coaching Mentoring and socialization Performance management, appraisal and feedback Workplace diversity Leadership Workplace health, stress, and safety Employee attitudes and satisfaction Careers and retirement Organizational communication Technology and work Employee motivation and job design Organizational change and development Employee citizenship and deviance Organizational effectiveness Work-nonwork/work-family Rigorous quantitative, qualitative, field-based, and lab-based empirical studies are welcome. Interdisciplinary scholarship is valued and encouraged. Submitted manuscripts should be well-grounded conceptually and make meaningful contributions to scientific understandingsand/or the advancement of science-based practice. The Journal of Business and Psychology is - A high quality/impactful outlet for organizational science research - A journal dedicated to bridging the science/practice divide - A journal striving to create interdisciplinary connections For details on submitting manuscripts, please read the author guidelines found in the far right menu.
期刊最新文献
Servant Leadership and Cooperation: The Moderating Role of Leader Group Prototypicality Here’s Looking at You: Does Eye Contact in Video Interviews Affect How Applicants are Perceived and Evaluated? Parent–Adolescent Transmission of Emotional Exhaustion: Testing a Social-Cognitive Spillover and Crossover Model The More Contextualized, the More Valid: Effects of Contextualization Strategies on Forced-choice Measurement The Relationship Between Team Diversity and Team Performance: Reconciling Promise and Reality Through a Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Registered Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1