Selection of Suitable Cloud Vendors for Health Centre: A Personalized Decision Framework with Fermatean Fuzzy Set, LOPCOW, and CoCoSo

IF 3.3 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Informatica Pub Date : 2023-11-23 DOI:10.15388/23-infor537
Sundararajan Dhruva, Raghunathan Krishankumar, Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, Kattur Soundarapandian Ravichandran, Amir H. Gandomi
{"title":"Selection of Suitable Cloud Vendors for Health Centre: A Personalized Decision Framework with Fermatean Fuzzy Set, LOPCOW, and CoCoSo","authors":"Sundararajan Dhruva, Raghunathan Krishankumar, Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, Kattur Soundarapandian Ravichandran, Amir H. Gandomi","doi":"10.15388/23-infor537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cloud computing has emerged as a transformative technology in the healthcare industry, but selecting the most suitable CV (“cloud vendor”) remains a complex task. This research presents a decision framework for CV selection in the healthcare industry, addressing the challenges of uncertainty, expert hesitation, and conflicting criteria. The proposed framework incorporates FFS (“Fermatean fuzzy set”) to handle uncertainty and data representation effectively. The importance of experts is attained via the variance approach, which considers hesitation and variability. Furthermore, the framework addresses the issue of extreme value hesitancy in criteria through the LOPCOW (“logarithmic percentage change-driven objective weighting”) method, which ensures a balanced and accurate assessment of criterion importance. Personalized grading of CVs is done via the ranking algorithm that considers the formulation of CoCoSo (“combined compromise solution”) with rank fusion, providing a compromise solution that balances conflicting criteria. By integrating these techniques, the proposed framework aims to enhance the rationale and reduce human intervention in CV selection for the healthcare industry. Also, valuable insights are gained from the framework for making informed decisions when selecting CVs for efficient data management and process implementation. A case example from Tamil Nadu is presented to testify to the applicability, while sensitivity and comparison analyses reveal the pros and cons of the framework.\nPDF  XML","PeriodicalId":56292,"journal":{"name":"Informatica","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatica","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/23-infor537","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cloud computing has emerged as a transformative technology in the healthcare industry, but selecting the most suitable CV (“cloud vendor”) remains a complex task. This research presents a decision framework for CV selection in the healthcare industry, addressing the challenges of uncertainty, expert hesitation, and conflicting criteria. The proposed framework incorporates FFS (“Fermatean fuzzy set”) to handle uncertainty and data representation effectively. The importance of experts is attained via the variance approach, which considers hesitation and variability. Furthermore, the framework addresses the issue of extreme value hesitancy in criteria through the LOPCOW (“logarithmic percentage change-driven objective weighting”) method, which ensures a balanced and accurate assessment of criterion importance. Personalized grading of CVs is done via the ranking algorithm that considers the formulation of CoCoSo (“combined compromise solution”) with rank fusion, providing a compromise solution that balances conflicting criteria. By integrating these techniques, the proposed framework aims to enhance the rationale and reduce human intervention in CV selection for the healthcare industry. Also, valuable insights are gained from the framework for making informed decisions when selecting CVs for efficient data management and process implementation. A case example from Tamil Nadu is presented to testify to the applicability, while sensitivity and comparison analyses reveal the pros and cons of the framework. PDF  XML
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康中心合适云供应商的选择:一个具有Fermatean模糊集、LOPCOW和CoCoSo的个性化决策框架
云计算已经成为医疗保健行业的一项变革性技术,但选择最合适的CV(“云供应商”)仍然是一项复杂的任务。本研究提出了医疗保健行业CV选择的决策框架,解决了不确定性、专家犹豫和冲突标准的挑战。该框架结合了FFS (Fermatean fuzzy set)来有效地处理不确定性和数据表示。专家的重要性是通过考虑犹豫和可变性的方差方法获得的。此外,该框架通过LOPCOW(“对数百分比变化驱动的客观加权”)方法解决了标准中极端值犹豫的问题,该方法确保了对标准重要性的平衡和准确评估。cv的个性化评分是通过排名算法完成的,该算法考虑了CoCoSo(“组合折衷方案”)与排名融合的公式,提供了平衡冲突标准的折衷方案。通过整合这些技术,提出的框架旨在增强基本原理,并减少人为干预的CV选择的医疗保健行业。此外,在选择简历进行有效的数据管理和流程实现时,还可以从框架中获得有价值的见解,从而做出明智的决策。以泰米尔纳德邦的一个案例为例,证明了该框架的适用性,而敏感性分析和对比分析则揭示了该框架的优缺点
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Informatica
Informatica 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
19
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The quarterly journal Informatica provides an international forum for high-quality original research and publishes papers on mathematical simulation and optimization, recognition and control, programming theory and systems, automation systems and elements. Informatica provides a multidisciplinary forum for scientists and engineers involved in research and design including experts who implement and manage information systems applications.
期刊最新文献
Beyond Quasi-Adjoint Graphs: On Polynomial-Time Solvable Cases of the Hamiltonian Cycle and Path Problems Confidential Transaction Balance Verification by the Net Using Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Proofs An Improved Algorithm for Extracting Frequent Gradual Patterns Offloaded Data Processing Energy Efficiency Evaluation Demystifying the Stability and the Performance Aspects of CoCoSo Ranking Method under Uncertain Preferences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1